Re: [c-nsp] ASR9006/9010 Multihop BFD

2016-12-30 Thread Curtis Piehler
I will have to check but I found something interesting. This was not line card specific like I thought it originally was. I found when a BFD MH session is in a vrf and the next hop is a Recursive lookup in the CEF table (ie: mpls transport) the MH session is stuck in initializing. When the

Re: [c-nsp] PE "Sprawl" - P/Core Router suggestions.

2016-12-30 Thread Phil Bedard
It’s all VoQ based so it’s similar to other VoQ-based hardware, so there is no such thing as an “egress” drop. There is an ingress traffic manager stage early in the pipeline that does most of the work. On the fabric based systems there is a request/grant paradigm for fabric access. At an

Re: [c-nsp] PE "Sprawl" - P/Core Router suggestions.

2016-12-30 Thread adamv0025
> Phil Bedard > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 7:30 PM > > Afaik, all the Cisco Jericho/Qumram based cards/fixed boxes use the 16MB > on-chip and 4GB of external DRAM. The 4GB is broken up into 1000 byte > chunks from what I remember. > Hmm 1000 byte chunks? That's not very efficient is it.

Re: [c-nsp] PE "Sprawl" - P/Core Router suggestions.

2016-12-30 Thread Tim Durack
I have an NCS-5501 in the lab (SE unit, non-SE not available for demo.) Working OSPF, MPLS, MP-BGP, L3VPN etc. No production experience yet. I am looking at the NCS-5501 for a high performance dense 10G P/PE (no CE involved.) Looking at NCS-5502 for dense 100G P. I think the NCS-5500 platform is

[c-nsp] GetVPN Pros and Cons from Operational perspective

2016-12-30 Thread Zahid Khan
Hi Folks, Happy New Year ! Have fun. One of my customer is demanding for GetVPN. Have never delivered this product before. It would be great if you guys can share your experience on GetVPN from the operational perspective. Will be very helpful for me to decide whether provide the same or not.