Re: [c-nsp] ospf mtr

Hi Lukasz Am trying to configure OSPF MTR and examine functionality I have used two different images: c7200-adventerprisek9-mz.152-4.S2 and c7200-advipservicesk9-mz.152-4.S7 R1(config)#policy-map type class-routing ipv4 unicast MAP % Can't provision policies of type 2 BR, Mohammad

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-920 - Remote UPGRADE

We've not run into any post-upgrade operational problems so far. The only 'excitement' we've encountered is some automatic FPGA upgrades between some images. No problems with that process to date, but it does cause some nail biting as the router takes 10-15 minutes to complete this process and

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-920 - Remote UPGRADE

I've performed this upgrade remotely without issue. However it was in a lab environment with nothing but LSM traffic on it. Time from reload to CLI via an inband path was about 7min. That said, I've got about 5 in production slated for upgrade so I'm hoping for positive responses to this

[c-nsp] ASR-920 - Remote UPGRADE

If I am upgrading from 3.16s to 3.18SP - is this safe to do remotely? I have MGT patched in, but not console cable. Any war stories would be greatly appreciated. Nick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] netflow restrictions on ASR920

adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: > What is striking though is that we could live without any kind of > telemetry from forwarding ASICs/NPUs up until now. what is striking is that we accepted certain vendors' netflow-good, sflow-bad mantra for so long without considering the consequences of

Re: [c-nsp] Bug with IOS-XR and SPAN ports?

> James Bensley > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 5:01 PM > To: c-nsp > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Bug with IOS-XR and SPAN ports? > > On 22 December 2016 at 13:58, wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > Super late response, festive period an all that :) > > > I was reading the

Re: [c-nsp] netflow restrictions on ASR920

Hi, > James Bensley > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 9:25 AM > > > If anyone can elaborate I’d like to know of if anyone from Cisco wants to > chime in please do. It’s very annoying they aren’t clearer about these things > as anything we want to do we have to lab test it and work it out for