Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences?

I did some test on NCS platform last year with spirent. What I remember NCS acted very strangely after I inject more than 10 k routes. It will be good to check the route limit of this platform. On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:27 AM, James Jun wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:09:56PM -0600, Aaron w

[c-nsp] MPLS service provider monitoring tools

Hello everyone, I am looking for some recommendations about network monitoring tools (open source or commercial). This is a MPLS Network with around 300 clients. L3vpn and L2vpn running. There are some central vpn services as well. There are no te tunnels. Device list are ASR 9k (9004) ASR 100X

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF LSA Type 3 / 5 question ...

It does make sense ... unfortunately the ABR is running IOS-XR and I have been unable to find a way to filter outbound LSAs (unless you want to filter everything.) On 2/2/17 8:45 PM, Fabio Mendes wrote: If the ABR outer is receiving the /24 from a downstream router on a different area and th

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF LSA Type 3 / 5 question ...

If the ABR outer is receiving the /24 from a downstream router on a different area and that ABR is also generating a /8 IA to the backbone, you can just filter out the /24 to other areas via a distribute list. That way you still have the more specific /24 on the ABR but the other routers on area

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF LSA Type 3 / 5 question ...

Fabio, Thank you for the response! Yes -- that's exactly what I'm trying to do. However, the problem is this: If I use the "summary-address" command, it not only masks it on the rest of the backbone, it masks it on the ABR too. Consequently I have to add a static route to the downstream rout

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF LSA Type 3 / 5 question ...

An even simpler way to do it is to suppress the announcement of the /24 to area 0 and leave only the IA. The 10.100 network is already behind the 10.0.0.0/8 summary and it's reachable through the same ABR generating that IA summary. On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Fabio Mendes wrote: > the f

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF LSA Type 3 / 5 question ...

the full command to summarize external LSA is summary-address, it wasn't very clear on my last email On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Fabio Mendes wrote: > If I understood correctly you are generating an IA LSA via the area range > command on the ABR and are also receiving a E1/2 LSA for a /24 th

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF LSA Type 3 / 5 question ...

If I understood correctly you are generating an IA LSA via the area range command on the ABR and are also receiving a E1/2 LSA for a /24 that is part of the IA range and want to mask it behind that same IA LSA. One simple way to do it is use the summary command under the ospf process, announcing a

[c-nsp] OSPF LSA Type 3 / 5 question ...

Hello everyone, Wondering if anyone has an idea on how to resolve a summarization conundrum I'm having. Imagine an ABR bordering areas 0 and 1 which is summarizing 10.0.0.0/8 to the backbone. Downstream is a router running OSPF with the ABR. On that router is a static route to yet another

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences?

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:09:56PM -0600, Aaron wrote: > I too am looking at the NCS55xx as a potential P-only fast label swapping > core box. ... Is segment routing/spring something you/we should be > concerned with ? > > -Aaron > We are looking at Segment Routing today in the lab, and are qui

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences?

Hello Aaron. Yea only IGP and LDP for labelswitching. We are thinking about testing out segment routing to be able to ditch LDP and be able to do TE without going RSVP-TE path. However, we have some legacy equipment the needs to be replaced first so we aren't in a hurry. //gustav -Urspru

Re: [c-nsp] Understanding A9K Power Status

XR 4.1.2 incase it helps... RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k#admin show environment power-supply Thu Feb 2 16:30:13.194 CST R/S/I Modules CapacityStatus (W) 0/PM0/* hostPM 2100Ok 0/PM1/* hostPM 2100Ok 0/PM2/*

Re: [c-nsp] Understanding A9K Power Status

Hi Jason I have some old outputs from a ASR9010 box that is running code 4.2.3 , it might help: RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:UM_HQ1_P_01#admin show install active summary Mon Apr 18 20:10:32.696 AST Default Profile: SDRs: Owner Active Packages: disk0:asr9k-p-4.2.3.CSCud37351-1.0.0 disk0:asr9k

Re: [c-nsp] Dual Cisco 7609-S for sale

Ok, sorry, I guess I'll delete the draft email for the tricycle I was trying to get rid of. LOL Again, sorry -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tom Hill Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 4:13 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences?

Gustav, do you just do an igp-core like ospf with ldp for label advertisements ? Also, would you mind sending the output for "show version" and "show inventory" (or xr equivalent , "admin show plat" and "show install committed summary") I might have my cisco account team bring one for lab testing

Re: [c-nsp] Dual Cisco 7609-S for sale

On 02/02/17 21:29, Saku Ytti wrote: > Also c-nsp and j-nsp are not for selling equipment. +1. The last thing anyone wants is for this list to descend some sort of second-hand sales forum. -- Tom ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net htt

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences?

I too am looking at the NCS55xx as a potential P-only fast label swapping core box. ... Is segment routing/spring something you/we should be concerned with ? -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/

Re: [c-nsp] Dual Cisco 7609-S for sale

On 2 February 2017 at 22:49, Aaron wrote: > Contact me off-list for more details if you are serious, at aar...@gvtc.com > Dude, that is sub 500 bucks config, I feel 'if you are serious', you're expecting quite bit more. Also c-nsp and j-nsp are not for selling equipment.

[c-nsp] Dual Cisco 7609-S for sale

I have (2) very loaded 7609-S for sale. They are both identical to each other and have served me and my ISP well working redundantly for years. No longer needed, and need a new home J Let me know if you are interested in purchasing them. In one chassis , I have the following cards. and

Re: [c-nsp] Understanding A9K Power Status

1) I'm not seeing the same issue as you do, sorry. What version of 5.3 are you running, SP and SMUs? (hope you are running 5.3.4) You could use the following commands to see if they give you the same output, but most probably: V1-V3# admin show inventory power-supply V1# run pwrdebug show V2-3#

[c-nsp] Understanding A9K Power Status

Hey there, According to the A9K HW installation guide, for the 9010 chassis, there are two slots for power shelves, and depending on whether it’s a V1 or V2 power shelf, each power shelf can hold up to 3 or 4 power modules, respectively. I have a bunch of these boxes, some running XR5.3, some r

[c-nsp] unaccountable dhcp snooping error message

Hi List, on a 6880x router running 15.2(1)SY3 we have configured ip helper on the user facing vlan interfaces and ip dhcp snooping. There are no direct access ports, only downlinks to access switching. The downlinks are untrusted but have "ip dhcp snooping information option allow-untrusted" co

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences?

Hello. We are using NCS 5001 in this role with great success haven't had any issues with it. They seem to be just working although that's not that surprising given that its not that complex of an environment. We don't do OSPF-TE or RSVP-TE though so on that I cannot comment. //Gustav -O

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 6500/SUP720-3BXL - 7600-SIP-400 => VPDN for ppp connection ?

7201 is a great BRAS. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 11:58 PM Olivier CALVANO wrote: > Hi > > thanks for your answer ;=) > > Ok i stop the idea with C6500/C7600 ... and use 7201. > It's a shame I had a stock of sup720-3BXL which have been replaced by ASR > (for internet transit) and which suddenly no lo