Re: [c-nsp] "snmpEngineTime" seems to wrap with "sysUpTime" in old IOS release

2017-04-06 Thread Martin T
Nathan, yes, "sysUpTime" wraps after 496 days. However, "snmpEngineTime" should not wrap before 68 years(or 135 years according to Cisco documentation). However, my issue is that they both seem to wrap at the same time. Chuck, I think I have this bug: https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quick

Re: [c-nsp] "snmpEngineTime" seems to wrap with "sysUpTime" in old IOS release

2017-04-06 Thread Adam Atkinson
On 06/04/17 17:01, Martin T wrote: Or is it simply a buggy "snmpEngineTime" implementation which wraps with the "sysUpTime" because to be more precise, then according to "sh ver" switch has been up for 6 years, 11 weeks, 2 days and 8 hours which is roughly 196243200 seconds so it could have wrapp

Re: [c-nsp] "snmpEngineTime" seems to wrap with "sysUpTime" in old IOS release

2017-04-06 Thread Chuck Church
I'm not sure if the snmpenginetime wrapping would increment the snmpEngineBoots, but it would make sense that it would. If that is the case, there are definitely bugs from a 8 or so years ago where devices didn't update their snmpEngineBoots counter upon reload. So you'd reboot switch, snmpEngine

Re: [c-nsp] "snmpEngineTime" seems to wrap with "sysUpTime" in old IOS release

2017-04-06 Thread Nathan Lannine
> How to explain this behavior? Is it likely some kind of SNMP agent I may not have this totally right, but I believe sysUpTime is a 32-bit value, which will only go out about 400 and some odd days before it wraps to 0. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-

[c-nsp] "snmpEngineTime" seems to wrap with "sysUpTime" in old IOS release

2017-04-06 Thread Martin T
Hi, if someone is interested in debugging a SNMP agent related issue on more than a decade old switch, then I have a WS-C2924-XL with IOS 12.0(5)WC14 with an uptime of more than 6 years, but with "snmpEngineTime" of 280 days. In fact, both "sysUpTime"(unit is centiseconds) and "snmpEngineTime"(uni

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 9K + source based routing

2017-04-06 Thread Jason Lixfeld
Hi, A cursory look appears to suggest that your configuration is incorrect. The example from the Support Forum link you referenced seems to corroborate that? ipv4 access-list abf-1 10 permit ipv4 any 100.100.100.0/24 nexthop1 VRF RED ipv4 1.1.1.1 nexthop2 VRF BLUE ipv4 2.2.2.2 nexthop3 ipv4

[c-nsp] ASR 9K + source based routing

2017-04-06 Thread Nemeth Laszlo
Hi All, I have a ASR9K1 with IOS XR 4.3.2 . Yes i know it is an old image, but rock stable in our environment. Today a made a source based routing: if the source packet is comming from 1.1.1.0/24 range the nexthop have to be 2.2.2.2 The config is this: RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:asr01#sh run interface