Re: [c-nsp] Setting relay agent IP on 4500

2017-08-04 Thread Phil Mayers
On 03/08/17 21:27, Jason Lixfeld wrote: On Jul 31, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Phil Mayers wrote: I guess you could use a dummy relay that added a fake RFC3527 option but yuck... What do you mean by this, exactly? Relay to a relay? Didn’t think that was possible because a relay only accepts broad

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-04 Thread Phil Mayers
On 03/08/17 22:53, Aaron Gould wrote: I do 1/512 sample rate on my asr9k's and usually multiple numbers gathered in nfsen by 512 to normalize sflow? Or netflow? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/list

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 1k vs 9k as a non-transit BGP router with full tables?

2017-08-04 Thread Mark Tinka
On 3/Aug/17 20:22, Tim Densmore wrote: > Yeah, this is definitely a piece of the puzzle for some of us. So, > discussion about the differences between the various RPs aside, what's > the real world experience with the asr100x and the 9001? It sounds like > BGP convergence is better on the 9001

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 1k vs 9k as a non-transit BGP router with full tables?

2017-08-04 Thread Mark Tinka
On 4/Aug/17 00:52, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: > > - the ‘HX’ series currently consist only of 1001HX and 1002HX, so both > fixed platforms with some modularity included; there are no HX fully > modular chassis, so my comment above was misleading in terms of > 1001HX/1002HX supporting RP3 - they sim

Re: [c-nsp] Setting relay agent IP on 4500

2017-08-04 Thread Jason Lixfeld
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 3:57 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: > > On 03/08/17 21:27, Jason Lixfeld wrote: >> >>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Phil Mayers wrote: >>> >>> I guess you could use a dummy relay that added a fake RFC3527 option but >>> yuck... >> >> What do you mean by this, exactly? Relay t

Re: [c-nsp] Setting relay agent IP on 4500

2017-08-04 Thread Phil Mayers
On 04/08/2017 16:05, Jason Lixfeld wrote: ip dhcp relay information option vpn ip dhcp compatibility suboption link-selection standard That's useful to know - TBH I wasn't even aware this setup was supported on routers, it has been a long time since I've looked at it. Have you tested to see

Re: [c-nsp] Setting relay agent IP on 4500

2017-08-04 Thread Jason Lixfeld
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: > > On 04/08/2017 16:05, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > >> ip dhcp relay information option vpn >> ip dhcp compatibility suboption link-selection standard > > That's useful to know - TBH I wasn't even aware this setup was supported on > routers, it ha

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 1k vs 9k as a non-transit BGP router with full tables?

2017-08-04 Thread Erik Sundberg
Side Note. Cisco is coming out with a ASR9901 with in the next couple months, not sure on the release date. I have seen a couple of slides on it. 2U 16x Ports for 1G 24x Ports 1G/10G (Configured in blocks of 4 for 1G or 10G) 2x 100G Ports 2x Tomahawk NPU's 456G Backplane IOS XR 64bit Front to b

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 1k vs 9k as a non-transit BGP router with full tables?

2017-08-04 Thread Łukasz Bromirski
Mark, > On 4 Aug 2017, at 10:43, Mark Tinka wrote: > > On 4/Aug/17 00:52, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: >> >> - the ‘HX’ series currently consist only of 1001HX and 1002HX, so both >> fixed platforms with some modularity included; there are no HX fully >> modular chassis, so my comment above was misl

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 1k vs 9k as a non-transit BGP router with full tables?

2017-08-04 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 07:11:06PM +, Erik Sundberg wrote: > Cisco is coming out with a ASR9901 with in the next couple months, not sure > on the release date. I have seen a couple of slides on it. > > 2U [..] > 1200w power usage Not sure I should find that impressive or scary... (Besi