Re: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing

2017-08-31 Thread Patrick Cole
James, Interesting you should mention the PPPoE thing as all of our ASR920 P/PE are deployed using BDI for NNI facing interfaces and we carry bucketloads PPPoE traffic across them all without any issues. The only thing I had to be weary of was accidentally putting two service instances in the br

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing

2017-08-31 Thread CiscoNSP List
Hmm - It cant be - Its not just to one nexthop that all the traffic is headingi.e there are 3 or 4 destination routers (2 ASR1001s, and the ME3600 (2 of those)...so 4 next-hop addresseswe cant be that unlucky that every one of those addresses is being mapped to gi0/0/20...no, just checke

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing

2017-08-31 Thread CiscoNSP List
Thanks Aaronthats what Im going to try shortly.Very strange how cef exact route reports it as load sharing, but it obviously isnt.and the next-hop link you provided, I have to read, but I think that is what is happening... From: Aaron Gould Sent: F

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing

2017-08-31 Thread Aaron Gould
In my mpls cloud I usually would lag dual gige's together to feed my PE boxes with more bandwidth. Worked well for me -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing

2017-08-31 Thread Aaron Gould
I just read this. I wonder if it applies. https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2033/prod_technical_reference09186a00800afeb7.html How CEF load balancing works …. If the destination is on a remote network reachable via a next hop router, the entry in the route cache is consisting

Re: [c-nsp] Testing CoPP

2017-08-31 Thread Nick Hilliard
Drew Weaver wrote: > Does anyone know a of a program that does obnoxiously rapid port > scans and/or random traffic patterns at high speed? I am trying to > test a new CoPP profile and I just want to let something loose on the > SVI IP address of a switch. mausezahn from the netsniff-ng toolkit wi

Re: [c-nsp] Testing CoPP

2017-08-31 Thread Darin Herteen
I use T50 for these type of things.. Works pretty darn slick. From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Drew Weaver Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 1:46 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Testing CoPP Does anyone know a of a program that does obnoxiously rap

[c-nsp] Testing CoPP

2017-08-31 Thread Drew Weaver
Does anyone know a of a program that does obnoxiously rapid port scans and/or random traffic patterns at high speed? I am trying to test a new CoPP profile and I just want to let something loose on the SVI IP address of a switch. Thanks in advance, -Drew __

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing

2017-08-31 Thread CiscoNSP List
Thanks James - Really appreciate the assistance on this :) Ive done a little more digging, checked fnf on 2 ASR1001's that are directly connected to the ME3600 to see top talkers - now, a quick check of cef exact route of some of those active conversations, and cef is telling me it is load-ba

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing

2017-08-31 Thread James Bensley
On 31 August 2017 at 01:35, CiscoNSP List wrote: > > AAh - Thank you James! So the ASR920 will not ECMP over 2 links, it requires > 4...that would explain the difference between egress/ingress (and why the 920 > is not working particularly well!) I'm not 100% sure but that is what the doc's in