[c-nsp] ASR920 MPLS P Functionality

2018-01-23 Thread Ian Goodall
Can anyone confirm if the ASR920 platform can be used in a MPLS P role? They are working fine for us as small PE but we are having some very odd RSVP issues in the lab with transit LSP. Ian ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://pu

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 MPLS P Functionality

2018-01-23 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 04:49:58PM +, Ian Goodall wrote: > Can anyone confirm if the ASR920 platform can be used in a MPLS P role? > They are working fine for us as small PE but we are having some very odd > RSVP issues in the lab with transit LSP. We've done a bit of testing as P with LD

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 MPLS P Functionality

2018-01-23 Thread Mark Tinka
On 23/Jan/18 18:49, Ian Goodall wrote: > Can anyone confirm if the ASR920 platform can be used in a MPLS P role? > They are working fine for us as small PE but we are having some very odd > RSVP issues in the lab with transit LSP. What are these odd issues? Mark. __

[c-nsp] Question about returning multiple un-numbered interface attributes via radius

2018-01-23 Thread Bryan Tabb
Hi all We have a mixture of BNGs, ASR9k and ASR1k that use Freeradius for AAA. One of the differences between the models is the format for the unnumbered loopback attribute that comes from Freeradius For the ASR9k format is "ip:ipv4-unnumbered=Loopback2000" For the ASR1k format is "ip:ip-unnum

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 MPLS P Functionality

2018-01-23 Thread Ian Goodall
After further investigation and debug it looks like we have hit bug CSCuy29638 in a Juniper environment. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 23/Jan/18 18:49, Ian Goodall wrote: > > Can anyone confirm if the ASR920 platform can be used in a MPLS P role? > They are working

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 MPLS P Functionality

2018-01-23 Thread Patrick Cole
I've not experienced any issues using them as P, but that is in a pure cisco environment. Interop can always be a pain. PC Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:38:34PM +, Ian Goodall wrote: > After further investigation and debug it looks like we have hit bug > CSCuy29638 in a Juniper environment. > >

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 MPLS P Functionality

2018-01-23 Thread Hari Sapkota
No issues as of now since I am using RSVP TE with explicit-path. And, the signaling seems ok all the times. On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:30 AM, Patrick Cole wrote: > I've not experienced any issues using them as P, but that is in a pure > cisco environment. Interop can always be a pain. > > PC > >

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 MPLS P Functionality

2018-01-23 Thread somphong pokfai
asr920 usefull mpls but small route table. On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Hari Sapkota wrote: > No issues as of now since I am using RSVP TE with explicit-path. And, the > signaling seems ok all the times. > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:30 AM, Patrick Cole wrote: > > > I've not experienced an

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 MPLS P Functionality

2018-01-23 Thread Mark Tinka
On 24/Jan/18 01:38, Ian Goodall wrote: > After further investigation and debug it looks like we have hit > bugCSCuy29638 in a Juniper environment. Ah, yes - that's a nasty bug. First hit it in 2016. Thankfully, Cisco stepped up and sent us some Engineering code to test a fix within a week of f

[c-nsp] Nexus Config Sanity Check

2018-01-23 Thread Mike Hammett
We have a Nexus 3548 connected to Ethernet transport connected to a Mikrotik CCR on the far end. The CCR's configuration is fairly straight forward, but so is the Nexus. We have a native VLAN (200) and a tagged VLAN (778). We're not seeing each other over 778. Thoughts? Nexus# show run int

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus Config Sanity Check

2018-01-23 Thread Mike Hammett
Transport provider admitted to having a VLAN filter in place. They're working to fix that. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Mike Hammett" To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday