Was afraid it might come to that:)
Need to see how the Contrail vRouter agents that have to build the
tunnels behave in this regard but I guess it should work..at least from
a theory point of view.
On 2018-05-17 01:07, Arie Vayner wrote:
I have a feeling you will have to create point to point
> mi...@duras.ro
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 10:57 PM
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying something strange and funky in a lab and of course ending up at
a
> dead-end :)
>
> I'm trying to configure OpenContrail to peer with ASR9K.
> I've already found a sample configuration for ASR903 but that one h
Thanks Adam.
Rest inline.
On 2018-05-17 10:18, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
mi...@duras.ro
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 10:57 PM
Hi guys,
I'm trying something strange and funky in a lab and of course ending
up at
a
dead-end :)
I'm trying to configure OpenContrail to peer with ASR9K
One more question - I see the FX series supports up to 1.7 million routes, but
is slightly slower at pure pps forwarding.
Are these positioned as more of a "router" than the EX series?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Nick Cutting
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 9:53 PM
To:
Hi all,
last weekend one switch in our VSS pair failed. Redundancy/VSS
did work and we kept our connectivity besides a couple of hosts
that only have a single uplink and were connected to that particular
chassis.
When I came to the data centre I found the failed chassis in rommon.
A simple "boot"
