hi,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:31:47PM +, Nick Cutting wrote:
> The 6148's are so bad - I think they share 1g of bandwidth per 8 ports. I
> saw a client dropping TB's a day with these linecards.
Indeed. And refurbished 6748GE-TX (with 40GE fabric connection) can be
had for about 300
The 6148's are so bad - I think they share 1g of bandwidth per 8 ports. I saw
a client dropping TB's a day with these linecards.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Tom Hill
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 10:08 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Idiot
On 28/09/18 14:57, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> To that end, I’ve got a bunch of WS-X6148A-GE-45AF cards and a pair of
> SUP720-3BXLs in a 7606 chassis (PID: CISCO7606) and it works fine despite the
> WS-X6148A-GE-45AF data sheet making no reference to 7600 support, only 6500
> support.
>
> I need
Hey there,
I haven’t dealt with the 7600 platform for a number of years, so I need a quick
idiot check on what I think I remember. IIRC, the 7600 chassis (non-S) is the
same thing as a 6500 chassis (non-E), so anything that works in one should work
in the other.
To that end, I’ve got a bunch
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 08:01:22AM +, Harivishnu Abhilash wrote:
> Thanks for the response. But we were quite surprised as the 6800 was
> doing EoMPLS perfectly.
It's based on 6500 architecture, which has done MPLS and EoMPLS (and,
depending on Supervisor generation, also VPLS) "since
Thanks for the response. But we were quite surprised as the 6800 was doing
EoMPLS perfectly. We had to do L2tpV3 as we shifted the role of the mpls
device to non-mpls (sort of a migration from a PE role to CE for design
requirements) and more over we are only extending a peering VLAN to get
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 03:38, Hari . wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> We are trying to extend the L2doamin for IP cloud (non-mpls), the
> intention was to use l2tpv3, but it doesn't seem to be supported in
> 6800/3850
> Anyone tried or can provide some guidance
Hi,
First things first : DON'T !
More
