Re: [c-nsp] Max usable RAM on a Cisco 3945E?

2019-01-13 Thread Ɓukasz Bromirski
You can put 4GB safely into 3945E: > On 13 Jan 2019, at 19:54, Mark Leonard wrote: > > Hi all, > > I recall reading back in the day that the ISR G2 series (specifically > the 3900s) couldn't address more than 2GB of RAM even though kits were > available for 4GB. Was this ever resolved through

[c-nsp] Max usable RAM on a Cisco 3945E?

2019-01-13 Thread Mark Leonard
Hi all, I recall reading back in the day that the ISR G2 series (specifically the 3900s) couldn't address more than 2GB of RAM even though kits were available for 4GB. Was this ever resolved through an IOS update? Situation: I have a (new to me) 3945E that I'd like to have do multiple peers with

Re: [c-nsp] RFC5837

2019-01-13 Thread Saku Ytti
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 12:22, Nathan Ward wrote: > > I'm happy to write supporting traceroute for linux+osx should someone > > have supporting device to test against :) > > How about you write the Linux implementation of the client and responder :-) The responder here is the kernel, I'd rather n

Re: [c-nsp] RFC5837

2019-01-13 Thread Nathan Ward
> On 13/01/2019, at 10:26 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: > > I'm happy to write supporting traceroute for linux+osx should someone > have supporting device to test against :) How about you write the Linux implementation of the client and responder :-) -- Nathan Ward ___

Re: [c-nsp] RFC5837

2019-01-13 Thread Saku Ytti
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 09:45, Nikolay Shopik wrote: > Are there traceroute implementation had patch for it? last time I > checked (5 years or so), there isn't any. Though we did complained to > our vendor about it. I've not actively researched, but I don't think this is a problem. Writing tracer