On 10/Jan/20 16:57, Tom Hill wrote:
> To some extent, I would agree. Though I do not agree entirely.
>
> At a certain level of "one size fits all", you reach a point where no,
> actually that box isn't suitable for every function. Either it's
> designed for a different use-case, or the bill of
On 10/Jan/20 16:52, Brian Turnbow wrote:
> You neglected to mention that they also mostly provide feature parity across
> the platforms that use that silicon
> So box a and box b will do the sames things in the same way, with the same
> commands.
> So no we at business unit service provider
On 09/01/2020 18:19, Gert Doering wrote:
> Cisco has a zillion products that mainly differenciate in "which of
> the advertised features are unusable or broken" and "what operating
> system do we use this week?".
>
> Ditching out half the products and using the engineering capacity
> freed by
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
> Broadcom levels the playing field amongst traditional and new vendors.
> If Cisco and Juniper have the same access to Broadcom chips as do newer
> market entrants such as Arista and Arrcus, what are we really paying the
> traditional, expensive vendors for when
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
>
> I do have *null* understanding for "we have cisco proprietary protocols that
> our customers are actively using (HSRP, EIGRP) but we do not support this on
> because we can, buy something else!" (EIGRP on IOS XR
> on NCS5k, HSRPv2 with IPv6 on ASR920).
>
On 10/Jan/20 13:09, Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson wrote:
>
>
> Additionally The NCS line, both the DC and SP products, are based on Broadcom
> chipsets which are heavily limited in their capabilities, particularly egress
> TCAM capabilities are limited in such a way that it makes it almost
On 9/Jan/20 20:19, Gert Doering wrote:
>> Cisco has a zillion products that mainly differenciate in "which of
>> the advertised features are unusable or broken" and "what operating
>> system do we use this week?".
>>
>> Ditching out half the products and using the
On 9/Jan/20 20:19, Gert Doering wrote:
> Cisco has a zillion products that mainly differenciate in "which of
> the advertised features are unusable or broken" and "what operating
> system do we use this week?".
>
> Ditching out half the products and using the engineering capacity
> freed by
