please remove me from this mailing list.
On 21/08/2020 18:49, c...@marenda.net wrote:
Sorry, i think the behaviour is explainable.
You have (I think, on both sides equivalent config)
Two Gig Ports bundled with LACP to that prot-channel.
For that, the switch speak link-local pakets to the neighbor device.
Now , yo build that xconnect and ask to forward link-local pakets to the
remote.
OK, device does this.
Recieving device does some fancy load blancing an therfor, LACP starts to
fail since .
Either let the local switch handle the LACP Bundle and do not forward the
LACP packets
Thru that xconnect,
or build _two_ transparent xconnects/Eline/Epipe servicesso A-1 sees B-Side
1 and A-2 sees B-2
and the LACP Pakets from A1 and A2 do not go all to B1 or mixed/loadbalaced
to B1 and B2 (end vice-versa).
and _do_not_ bundle locally.
Just my 0.01 $
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Kind regards
Veuillez agréer mes salutations distinguées
Met vriendelijke groet
Jürgen Marenda.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
<mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> > Im Auftrag von James
Bensley
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. August 2020 16:38
An: Eric Van Tol <e...@atlantech.net <mailto:e...@atlantech.net> >;
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Betreff: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 LACP and xconnect
On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 19:16, Eric Van Tol <e...@atlantech.net
<mailto:e...@atlantech.net> > wrote:
Interface configs:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
mtu 1600
no ip address
load-interval 30
negotiation auto
channel-group 1 mode active
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
mtu 1600
no ip address
load-interval 30
negotiation auto
channel-group 1 mode active
!
interface Port-channel1
mtu 1600
no ip address
load-interval 30
negotiation auto
no keepalive
service instance 1 ethernet
encapsulation default
l2protocol peer lacp
xconnect x.x.x.x 1234 encapsulation mpls pw-class Raw-Mode-VC5
mtu 1600
What happens if you change each interface to be "channel-group 1 mode on"
and remove "l2protocol peer lacp" to disable LACP and remove it from the
equation?
Cheers,
James.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
