Re: [c-nsp] RR scalability question

2020-11-27 Thread Mark Tinka
On 11/25/20 20:57, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: Best thing you can do is not estimate, but actually test. Agree. I recall doing this back in 2014 when we first launched the CSR1000v as an RR. It had about 20 clients, each needing a full feed. We reset all sessions on the RR.

Re: [c-nsp] RPKI extended-community RFC8097

2020-11-27 Thread Mark Tinka
On 11/28/20 02:32, Ben Maddison via cisco-nsp wrote: At this stage, I don't really care if they fix this anymore. We're now firmly pointed at the "no more XE in the field" target, and this is only one (admittedly large) reason why. This; for us too. Simply moving on. In relation to this

Re: [c-nsp] RPKI extended-community RFC8097

2020-11-27 Thread Ben Maddison via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Hi Lukas, On 11/28, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hello Mark, hello Jakob, > > On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 03:03, Mark Tinka wrote: > > On 18/Apr/20 16:23, Lukas Tribus wrote: > > > > > > > > More about this issue here: > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/nanog@nanog.org/msg104776.html

Re: [c-nsp] RPKI extended-community RFC8097

2020-11-27 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hello Mark, hello Jakob, On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 03:03, Mark Tinka wrote: > On 18/Apr/20 16:23, Lukas Tribus wrote: > > > > > More about this issue here: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/nanog@nanog.org/msg104776.html > > > > Code with CSCvc84848 fixed will hopefully ship this summer, until then