Re: [c-nsp] [External Email] Re: big uptime - what you got ?

Am 10.02.2020 20:34, schrieb Aaron Gould: You gotta tell me for reals if you still have cells going through that box ? Of course, but i'm not really proud of it... We still have some legacy ATM-based DSLAMs which at last will be migrated in the near future. atm-03#sh atm vp traffic | exclude

Re: [c-nsp] [External Email] Re: big uptime - what you got ?

Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) LS1010 WA4-5 Software (LS1010-WPK2-M), Version 12.1(12c)EY, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 02-Aug-02 09:13 by eaarmas Image text-base:

Re: [c-nsp] Log message / Memory Value

%PLATFORM-4-ELEMENT_WARNING:Switch 1 R0/0: smand: 1/RP/0: Used Memory value 91% exceeds warning level 90% It's a known bug (CSCvd45973). See https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCvd45973 Consider upgrade to e.g. 16.4 Regards, Alex

Re: [c-nsp] [j-nsp] MX-80 as a BRAS and as a LAC

Hi, how much users do you want to terminate on your MX80 ? Keep in mind, that there is a limit of 16.000 IFLs. When you plan to use hierarchical qos, better go to a bigger platform. Regards, Alex Am 19.10.2013 21:44, schrieb Enoch Nyatoti: Hello, I am new to Juniper hence my request. We

[c-nsp] Sample config for C819 4g LTE Router

Hi, can anyone provide a sample config for a Cisco 819 LTE Router? I would like to connect to vodafone LTE in germany. We are using Vodafone 3G/UMTS/HSDPA since quite a while and it works like a charm. Now it try to configure my first 4g router and i miss the necessary PPP commands. Regards,

Re: [c-nsp] Prefer (outbound) certain bgp peer for AS or subnet ?

Hi, with local-pref you can control outgoing traffic for a specific destination. Prefer one of your upstreams based on the source of traffic, you have to use policy-based routing. Regards, Alex Am 16.10.2013 03:49, schrieb CiscoNSP List: Thanks for everyone's responses - Would the following

[c-nsp] Differences between Supervisor Engine 6L-E and 6-E

Hi guys, can anyone give me an indication of the exact differences between Supervisor Engine 6L-E and Supervisor Engine 6-E for Cat 4506-E Thanks in advance... Regards, Alex ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Differences between Supervisor Engine 6L-E and 6-E

Many thanks for the quick reply. This answers all my open questions... Regards, Alex Am 11.10.2013 12:58, schrieb Joshua Morgan: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps4324/prod_models_comparison.html On Friday, October 11, 2013, Alex D. wrote: Hi guys, can anyone give me

Re: [c-nsp] 10Gigabit Ethernet with Sup6L-E

Might be some hardware problem with either supervisor (more likely) or X2 transceivers itself (less likely). Have you tried inserting different X2 transceivers or using same one in different chassis? Yes, i tried 4 different subs with 6 different X2 transceivers. But in the meanwhile, i know

[c-nsp] 10Gigabit Ethernet with Sup6L-E

Hi list, i have a problem with some a WS-C4506-E chassis. The systems doesn't boot when 1 or both 10G ports are equiped with a X2 transceiver. All status LEDs remain dark. When i power-on the supervisor engine without transceivers, system boots successful. After reinserting a transceiver,

[c-nsp] Fwd: Re: 10Gigabit Ethernet with Sup6L-E

dies as in powers off? faulty hardware, id assume. No i can eliminate that, because there's the same behaviour on all 4 chassis with Sup6L-E. maybe config snippets would help. nothing is configured . I erased startup-config. as a side note, as of 12.2(53)sg or so -- sup6e and sup6l-e are