I have read that multiple match lines in a route-map are treated with AND
logic.
But this scenario here does not do AND, but OR:
route-map IX-TEST-OUT permit 10
match community PREPEND-1-PEERING
match community PEERING-OUT
set as-path prepend 65001
route-map IX-TEST-OUT permit 20
match
, March 24, 2009 17:05
To: Andy BIERLAIR; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] match multiple communities in route-map
Hello Andy:
I don't think you want the two match-community statements in your first two
route-map statements. So, that would be:
route-map IX-TEST-OUT permit 10
I'm running s72033-ipservicesk9-mz.122-18.SXF15a with SSH on Port 22.
Due too many bots hammering that well-known port, I wanted to change it to
something else, but somehow I can't:
Router(config)#ip ssh port
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
Router(config)#ip ssh ?
I'm trying to run netflow on one of our Cisco core routers (SUP720-3BXL with
SXF15a), but I think I am hitting some limitations because of this:
%EARL_NETFLOW-SP-4-TCAM_THRLD: Netflow TCAM threshold exceeded, TCAM
Utilization [99%]
The setup of netflow looks like this (globally):
ip
that netflow is the key.
-
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Bourges [mailto:andy-li...@bourges.de]
Sent: 15 March 2009 17:18
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Andy BIERLAIR
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Netflow on SUP720-3BXL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Sunday 15