Re: [c-nsp] BRAS PPPOE vpn

Hey, No you can reuse your virtual templates for all customers, vrf or internet. See below config for BRAS and av-pairs required on AAA server. You might not want to use DHCP for IP assignment and just use AAA as it will be cleaner. I also found that you will have more flexibility using aaa

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS and NAT

I am assuming you need to give a central service (NMS, VOIP) to customer your VRFs. See the following links http://www.ciscosystems.ro/en/US/products/ps6604/products_qanda_item09186a00800b2cd7.shtml http://www.cisco.biz/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t13/feature/guide/ftnatvpn.html Anthony Primoz

Re: [c-nsp] BRAS Redundancy

Thanks for the input but I'm not to worried about which BRAS the client logs into, the one that responds first would be fine. What I really need to know is how to assign static IPs to clients if they log into either BRAS when both BRASs have a different network range on their loopbacks.

Re: [c-nsp] BRAS Redundancy

for routes) prefixes into the routing protocol (I would recommend BGP) so that you advertise them as /32. No magic... Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Anthony McGarry Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 13:50

Re: [c-nsp] BRAS Redundancy

a DHCP pool on each router, setting the gateway locally, while providing the actual address from the DHCP server. Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Anthony McGarry Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 13:07

Re: [c-nsp] BRAS Redundancy

Sounds like an option, Ill set it up in the lab and do some testing. Thanks Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: I'm using LAM (Local Area Mobility) for a similar scenario. You may want to have a look at it. It's pretty damn simple to setup; just 3 commands)

[c-nsp] BRAS Redundancy

Hi, I was hoping someone can help me with the following issue. I currently have a 7301 acting as my BRAS running on 12.2(33)SRD3. I use the ISG feature to terminate PPPoE sessions on QinQ subinterfaces. The virtual templates associated with the bba groups use ip unnumbered loopback 0. The

[c-nsp] ME3400 - Priority Queue

Hi, From the following command I can see the egress priority queue is disabled on the port sh platform qos debug interface g0/12 queueing GigabitEthernet0/12 Egress Priority Queue : disabled Shaped queue weights (absolute) : 332 0 0 0 Shared queue weights : 0 255 255 1 The port bandwidth

Re: [c-nsp] ES20 - Port Queues

Hi, I have a 7609 with a WS-X6748-GE-TX. When I show the port capabilities I can see rx-(1q8t), tx-(1p3q8t) If I show queueing on an interface I see all the WRED and WRR queue configuration. This is great, I can make changes and view changes. I also have an ES20 and ES20+ line card in the

Re: [c-nsp] ES20 - Port Queues

approximately 75% of the loop bandwidth due to the queue depths we had configured on our service policies prior to these changes. -Will - Original Message - From: Anthony McGarry anthony.mcga...@plannet21.ie Sent: Wed, September 30, 2009 4:59 Subject:Re: [c-nsp] ES20 - Port Queues Hi, I have