Hi,
Try : redundancy config-sync ignore mismatch , then reload the standby
Cdt
Kayssar
> On Aug 17, 2014, at 4:04, "ext Tammy Firefly" wrote:
>
>
>> On 8/16/14, 20:53:18, Frank Bulk wrote:
>> Looks like you got them all on =)
>>
>> When you successfully boot the new SUP in a separate chassi
, 2014 3:57 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SPAN destination on oversubscribed module
On 09/01/14 14:47, Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis) wrote:
> Dears ,
>
> We have two 6509 interconnected via port-channel of two 10Ge port
> carrying about 3Gb. the modul
Dears ,
We have two 6509 interconnected via port-channel of two 10Ge port carrying
about 3Gb. the module used is WS-X6716-10T and only the two mentioned port are
used on this module for the moment . We are now adding a monitoring probe that
will be connected on this module , the estimated moni
kayssar.ben_hamm...@nsn.com
-Original Message-
From: ext Tiago Hirao [mailto:tiago.hi...@locaweb.com.br]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 11:55 AM
To: Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis);
Subject: RES: [c-nsp] 6509 console access problem
Do you have configured "exec-timeout"
Dears ,
I have no console access on my 6509 , I see I have an idle console
connection but I am eable to clear it , "neither clear line" nor "clear line
console" solve the problem
SWA#show users
Line User Host(s) Idle Location
0 con 0i
Dears ,
After a long case discussed with Cisco TAC , this is the final configuration
that make a VACL capture work successfully:
vlan filter ASTELIA vlan-list 1356,1357,1351,
vlan filter ASTELIA vlan-list 3737,
interface GigabitEthernet9/23
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
Hi lee,
Even for egress-only SPAN , 6509 accept only two session not 14 :
TSA3-PACOSWB9002(config)#monitor session 1 source vlan 1346 tx
TSA3-PACOSWB9002(config)#monitor session 2 source vlan 1347 tx
TSA3-PACOSWB9002(config)#monitor session 3 source vlan 3836 tx
% Local Egress Session limi
obile : +216 29 349 952 / +216 98 349 952
FIX : +216 71 108 173
Skype : kayssar ben hammadi
kayssar.ben_hamm...@nsn.com
-Original Message-
From: ext Lee [mailto:ler...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 4:51 PM
To: Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis)
Cc: cisco-nsp@
: ext Pavel Skovajsa [mailto:pavel.skova...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 10:39 AM
To: Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis)
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] switching of monitored traffic
It will switch it as any other incoming traffic.
-pavel
On Saturday, Septemb
Dears,
We are monitoring traffic from Switch A to Switch B with "monitor session"
, Switch B receive now all traffic handled by Switch A .
Does Switch B treat this traffic as normal traffic and continue to switch
it according to configured Vlans or it has a way to know that it come fr
Dears,
Do you know if we can monitor the internal Vlan that 6509 assign to
subinterface :
#show vlan internal usage
VLAN Usage
360 GigabitEthernet9/45.360
400 GigabitEthernet9/36.400
431 GigabitEthernet9/25.431
ie: can we use those vlan in monitor session togeth
Dears,
Can somebody confirm if the command #maximum-path eibgp is used to mix
internal and external routes in same multipath or just to enable multipath on
eibgp neighbor in Confederation topology ?
Br.
BEN HAMMADI Kayssar
NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS
Lead Engineer -BroadBand Connectivity
JNCI
en hammadi
kayssar.ben_hamm...@nsn.com
-Original Message-
From: ext Edward Salonia [mailto:e...@edgeoc.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 4:28 PM
To: Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis)
Cc: ext Justin M. Streiner; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6500 Supervisor redendancy
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6500 Supervisor redendancy
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis) wrote:
> I have a 6509 with a standalone Sup720 and I am preparing to add a
> redundant one, I don't know the software on the new Supervisor and my
> final goal is to make bo
Dears
I have a 6509 with a standalone Sup720 and I am preparing to add a redundant
one, I don't know the software on the new Supervisor and my final goal is to
make both work on SSO mode. Can someone propose a procedure with happy end :) ?
Br.
BEN HAMMADI Kayssar
NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORK
: Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis)
[mailto:kayssar.ben_hamm...@nsn.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 6:39 AM
To: ext Chuck Church; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 6500 NSF/SSO uplink redendancy
Thanks for the answer ,
There will be any oversubscription in between
Thanks for the answer ,
There will be any oversubscription in between ?
Kayssar
-Original Message-
From: ext Chuck Church [mailto:chuckchu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 3:36 PM
To: Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis); cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp
Dears
I read somewhere that Interfaces in the Redundant Supervisor will
use same Mac and IP of the corresponding interface in the Active
Supervisor . in the other hand Interfaces in the Redundant Supervisor
use different port number , is there any manual config needed in case
the activ
Dears ,
I am trying to load balance on destination port with SPAN and VACL ,
Below the configuration :
interface GigabitEthernet9/24
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
switchport capture
interface GigabitEthernet9/46
switchport
switchpo
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VACL and SPAN load share on destination ports
On 08/01/13 08:49, Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis) wrote:
> Dears ,
>
>Below the configuration for SPAN and VACL :
Don't hijack an existing thread; start a new one.
> load balancing is needed b
Dears ,
Below the configuration for SPAN and VACL :
interface GigabitEthernet9/24
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
switchport capture
interface GigabitEthernet9/46
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
21 matches
Mail list logo