Re: [c-nsp] 7206 Gig Ethernet Options

Justin Shore wrote: Brandon Price wrote: Actually, you can install a C7200-I/O-GE+E and save yourself a PA slot and the associated bandwidth point hit. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/101247 Now that's something that I did not know. Any word on if this is act

Re: [c-nsp] 7206 Gig Ethernet Options

Actually, you can install a C7200-I/O-GE+E and save yourself a PA slot and the associated bandwidth point hit. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/101247 Brandon Gregori Parker wrote: PA-GE is the only available option for more GE ports on the 7206vxr...and it's one interface pe

[c-nsp] PBR on a VRF interface?

olicy can be used ONLY for marking (set/clear DF bit) on VRF interfaces Router(config-subif)#end Router# Brandon Price Network Engineer  |  Sterling Communications, Inc. 503.968.8908 x248 | 503.270.5285 fax | www.sterling.net Voice | Internet | Fax | CoLocation Learn more | www.sterling.net/

Re: [c-nsp] Twingig part of 3560E delivery?

I have ordered 3 of those switches and they came with 2 twingig converters each. Brandon -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Pavel Skovajsa Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 2:04 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Per packet load balancing with low latency applications

What are the negative ramifications of turning off fragmentation? Brandon -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tony Varriale Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 12:38 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re:

Re: [c-nsp] Policy Based Routing on PE

I am stuck. How to use PBR on the ingress to PE2 Brandon -Original Message- From: Rodney Dunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:22 AM To: Mateusz B?aszczyk Cc: Brandon Price; cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Policy Based Routing on PE hmmm.i

[c-nsp] Policy Based Routing on PE

I have a PE with 2 interfaces going to the same CE in vrf CUSTA. I would like packets with a certain SOURCE ip to take interface 2 and all other packets to follow normal routing in the vrf (interface 1). Where on the PE would I set up the route-map ? Any configuration examples? Brandon __

Re: [c-nsp] Conditional BGP

Could you guys recommend some good books or other documentation on some of these BGP "best practice" methodologies? I am a BGP novice but would like to get myself more up to speed on BGP kung fu. I found this current thread somewhat fascinating. Thanks Brandon -Original Message- From: [EM

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS VPN Question about PE-CE - Private or Public IP?

Other than just saying "its bad" can you give some specifics as to the problems you've run into using private addresses for PE-CE links? As long as the SP hands out unique addresses across all of the links, what does it matter whether they are "private" or "public" ? Brandon -Original Messag

Re: [c-nsp] 7206 12.2(18) Maximum # of MLPPP T1s on PA-MC-T3

Just for the heck of it I Bundled all 28 once in a lab with a NPE400 on one end and a NPE300 on the other.. I was able to pull about 40mbps or so across the link.. if memory serves me correct the cpus spiked pretty high.. above 90% I think... I didn't do a whole lot of testing but it definitely to

[c-nsp] OC48 with 6513?

Guys, Looking for some general pointers on what gear I should be looking at. We are starting a new POP and there is a local fiber provider that can hand us EITHER 1GB ethernet or OC48. My question is, what gear would I need to terminate the OC48 into our existing CAT6513 SUP720-3B? Would I nee

Re: [c-nsp] Possible security issue with CDP

duplex and vlan mismatches. Brandon Price Sterling Communications Inc. /31 <--- The Subnet Formally Known as "Unusable" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jared Mauch > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:24 AM &

Re: [c-nsp] Aggregation for multiple ISDN customers

Cant you just buy an ISDN PRI circuit? That should allow 23 inbound BRI calls? Brandon > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of root net > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 1:05 PM > To: Jay Hennigan > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re:

[c-nsp] Client/server bandwidth tester

Hey guys, I'm looking for a good bandwidth tester. I would like to have something that has a server piece on one side and a client on the other, So for example I just setup a point to point wireless link for a customer and it would be nice to throw a laptop on the far end and slam the link and se

Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading PIX 6.3 to 7.x

I have done this several times, each time my license was preserved.. Brandon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Felix Nkansah Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 12:34 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Upgrading PIX 6.3 to 7.x Hi,

Re: [c-nsp] OT: Check Point v Cisco PIX (ASA 5500 Series)

Netscreen 5400 15x the 3des performance, 2.5x number of tunnels and SUB 1 second stateful failover arent compelling enough reasons? Brandon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 6:15 AM To: Masood

Re: [c-nsp] 7200 and the PA-MC-2T3+ or PA-MC-2T3-EC PAs

th the older code. We use the single port PA-MC-T3 and MLPPP works great except your bundle CANNOT span FlexWAN Bays. So for us with the 1 port guys we have to have all of our members on the same DS3. Brandon Price Sterling Communications Inc. /31 <--- The Subnet Formally Known as "Unusa

[c-nsp] Connecting PA-MC-T3 to PA-T3+

Is there any way to have a PA-MC-T3 in a 7206 use the full DS3 (non channelized) for an HDLC connection to Another 7206 with a PA-T3+ in a lab environment? Thanks Brandon Price Sterling Communications Inc. /31 <--- The Subnet Formally Known as "

Re: [c-nsp] IOS version

g That would allow them to load 7600 code on it or "convert" the chassis to a 7600? Anyone know what I'm talking about? Brandon Price Sterling Communications Inc. /31 <--- The Subnet Formally Known as "Unusable" ___ cisc

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow Top Talkers?

utput of show proc is: CPU utilization for five seconds: 2%/1%; one minute: 2%; five minutes: 2% Can I safely crank down the aging timer? What is a good value? Brandon Price Sterling Communications Inc. /31 <--- The Subnet Formally Known as "Unusable" -Original Message

[c-nsp] Netflow Top Talkers?

eing all of the flows. It appeared that I would only see the flows that Were new since I started the capture, preexisting flows werent showing up. I am a complete novice regarding Netflow so any advice would be greatly appreciated. Brandon Price Sterling Communications Inc. /31 <--- The Subn

Re: [c-nsp] Loopback Advertise in OSPF

>The scalable approach - use OSPF to carry ONLY your infrastructure and Loopback addresses. >DO NOT carry your customer's IPv4/IPv6 addresses in OSPF, do this in iBGP instead. Does anyone have links to some good examples of this configuration? I am in the process of moving our small ISP to dyn

Re: [c-nsp] SmartNet coverage on Cisco's chassis-based products

Don't know about others be we buy spares of everything and then get the "el cheapo" NBD support. If bought on the secondary market the spares are cheaper than the 4 hour response contract, which realistically 4 hours of hard down time is unacceptable anyways... Brandon

Re: [c-nsp] Shunning Traffic on ASA's

Used it many times for keeping the BOZOS out.. Works great! Brandon Price Sterling Communications Inc. /31 <--- The Subnet Formally Known as "Unusable" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Koch Sent: Monday, Februa

[c-nsp] Untagged packets on trunk interfaces

t now: Cat6500/Sup720-3b 12.2(18)SXF12 ! interface GigabitEthernet9/3 description ISG1000-1 Untrust switchport switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 3 switchport mode trunk switchport nonegotiate no ip address speed 1000 duplex full no cdp enable Brandon

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS on CAT5500

PE1 to P is 100mb link which supports Jumbo frames no problem. The 5500 also acts as a PE for a few of our COLO customers so It needs to Be running MPLS while I transition the WAN links from PE1 to PE2 Hope that makes sense.. Brandon Price Sterling Communications Inc. /31 <--- The Sub

[c-nsp] MPLS on CAT5500

e native VLAN the switch will accept an additional 4 bytes. My question is, since the P router will always be the penultimate hop in this layout ? will having room for just 1 label be sufficient? Also the RSM in the cat5500 only supports TDP for label distribution ? Any potential drawbacks to this?

Re: [c-nsp] Flex-WAN vs. Enhanced FlexWAN

T3 in each bay. We have lots of MLPPP T1s. I am also interested in any potential pitfalls with these cards.. Brandon Price Sterling Communications Inc. /31 <--- The Subnet Formally Known as "Unusable" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS Hardware Support

The CE (Customer Edge) Routers at the customer locations do not need to have any MPLS functionality. Just your 7206s and 6500s only if the customer is coming in on multiple routers, otherwise you can just sneak by with a VRF on the router they connect to you on. The 7206s and 6500s have full MPLS s

Re: [c-nsp] Ethernet over Coax

We used ReadyLinks Coax to Ethernet bridge model CEB-401 http://www.ready-links.com We had coax between the buildings but didn't want to pay to have fiber pulled. The throughput is great, certainly near 100mpbs the only problem was That particular model has a really small MAC table, so random m