> On Dec 16, 2023, at 4:16 AM, Dragan Jovicic via cisco-nsp
> wrote:
>
> Greeting,
> We have a somewhat unusual scenario with thousands of CPE devices each
> using cellular interface and gre tunnel to connect to hub router, currently
> ASR 1001x.
> The hub router deploys NHRP map multicast
--- Begin Message ---
The NSA is behind in designing the new backdoor.
/s
> On Dec 15, 2020, at 3:34 AM, h...@interall.co.il wrote:
>
> We ordered 8 new ASR1009x at the end of July.
>
> Original delivery date was mid-September. Then pushed to October, then
> pushed to November, then to Dec
--- Begin Message ---
> On Oct 3, 2020, at 2:59 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> 03.10.2020 12:52, Scott Miller wrote:
>
>> Hello all, I’m looking for some recommendations. I have a customer, an
>> ISP, who is doing PPPoE for residential and “some” smaller business
>> accounts. PPPoE
--- Begin Message ---
> On Apr 20, 2019, at 9:49 AM, Alex K. wrote:
>
> Hello Dave,
>
> Thank you.
>
> Sure, it isn't *really* separated. After all, RPs' CPU connected to both
> (management interface and router forwarding matrix). It's really software
> imposed separation.
I’m always a bit
--- Begin Message ---
> On Jan 31, 2019, at 5:27 PM, Hunter Fuller wrote:
>
> We are trying a somewhat-radical new strategy. For our newest rack, we
> bought a Raspberry Pi Model 3B. It has four USB ports, and into each port
> we plugged a dual-headed USB to RS232 adapter, for a total of 8
--- Begin Message ---
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 3:14 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 13/Aug/18 19:43, Jon Wolberg wrote:
>
>> There was a very similar discussion on NANOG last month about the same
>> topic. You can read the thread here:
>>
>>
--- Begin Message ---
This is dated (I don’t think Apple is the only one supporting this in clients
anymore), but 802.11k exists to give the client information about the other APs
in a network - I’d suspect any client supporting this would be less “sticky”:
--- Begin Message ---
Just chiming in with a quick question...
> On Nov 22, 2017, at 1:25 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> Hey Scott,
>
> In edge links, you can limit multicast and broadcast very severely.
> There is very little point to limit unicast even in edge links, unless
> you
--- Begin Message ---
> On Oct 19, 2017, at 1:49 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> Take a look at the UBNT Edgepoint gear as well. Fairly cool, comes in 10G/1G
> speed varieties with both routed and switched options.
Just be very careful with fencing UBNT gear off from
--- Begin Message ---
These guys dominate in the WISP market and make great hardware. Support is
excellent.
We have around 4 of them up on roofs in NYC, they take the weather quite well
as long as you get the recommended enclosure.
They take PoE in and can provide PoE out - all “passive” PoE
les Sprickman via cisco-nsp
> <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is 100% cisco-specific, but not technical.
>
> I’m finding lots of vendors offering their own version of support programs,
> many of which are competitively-priced and backed with
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
This is 100% cisco-specific, but not technical.
I’m finding lots of vendors offering their own version of support programs,
many of which are competitively-priced and backed with really well-stocked part
bins. Of course they cannot offer software.
We’ve had one
--- Begin Message ---
> On Jan 23, 2017, at 3:05 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:28:37PM -0500, Shawn L wrote:
>> I guess it all depends on what you utilize support for. We tend to have
>> in-house spares, etc. that we can swap in in the event of a
--- Begin Message ---
> On Dec 8, 2016, at 5:26 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> Gert Doering wrote:
>> And vendors that actually cared what their users asked for (at least
>> if you offered some money as bait). And understood protocol specs.
>
> URTROLL
>
> I still, ironically,
--- Begin Message ---
I have no words for the idiocy I’m encountering with just trying to download
software. I suspect that I could probably accomplish this with less effort by
calling in and using the “security flaw” exception.
I’m a small customer, I don’t ask much, I pay what seems like a
--- Begin Message ---
> On Aug 6, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> On 5 Aug 2016, at 11:02, Saku Ytti wrote:
>> I disappointed Cisco does not mention CoPP at all.
>
> Or running ntp in a vrf, although that didn't stop problems with the last bad
> ntp
16 matches
Mail list logo