Re: [c-nsp] QinQ termination on a Catalyst 6800

2019-02-19 Thread Christophe Fillot
On 18/02/2019 23:11, Peter Rathlev wrote: On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 20:14 +, Tom Hill wrote: On 14/02/2019 09:01, Christophe Fillot wrote: Anyone knows if this platform supports QinQ termination ? The "encapsulation dot1q X second-dot1q Y" command is not present, but maybe there

[c-nsp] QinQ termination on a Catalyst 6800

2019-02-14 Thread Christophe Fillot
Hello, Anyone knows if this platform supports QinQ termination ? The "encapsulation dot1q X second-dot1q Y" command is not present, but maybe there is another way to do it ? Thanks in advance, Christophe ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.

[c-nsp] Nexus 56xx switch-profile problem after upgrade

2016-07-13 Thread Christophe Fillot
Hello, We have upgraded a pair of Nexus 5672 from 7.2(1)N1(1) to 7.3(0)N1(1). We now have a switch-profile commit error related to spanning-tree. In the running configuration (sh run) we have: spanning-tree pseudo-information vlan 1-3967, 4048-4093 root priority 0 In the switch-profile co

Re: [c-nsp] Nex3K and MTU

2016-03-03 Thread Christophe Fillot
On 03/03/2016 02:10 AM, CiscoNSP List wrote: > Yet "other" ports show 1500bytes: > > # sh int eth 1/1 > Ethernet1/1 is down (Link not connected) > Dedicated Interface > Hardware: 10/100/1000 Ethernet, address: 547f.ee7b.ff28 (bia 547f.ee7b.ff28) > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100 Kbit, DLY 10 usec >

Re: [c-nsp] vs ip device tracking on cisco3850

2015-06-22 Thread Christophe Fillot
On 06/19/2015 05:46 PM, Tarko Tikan wrote: > hey, > >> I have been troubleshooting a similar problem with IP device tracking >> on a CAT4500 with SUP8. IDT was enabled by default and there was >> really no way to properly disable it. > AFAIR it was possible to disable it per interface, and thats no

Re: [c-nsp] IP SLA

2012-11-19 Thread Christophe Fillot
Saku Ytti wrote: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cisco-sla-protocol-04 http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/app-notes/3500145-en.pdf I wonder if those implicitly mean that you are allowed to build responder or not. The Cisco draft is not really what we're seeing in real-life (real-life identi

Re: [c-nsp] IP SLA

2012-11-19 Thread Christophe Fillot
Saku Ytti wrote: I have been looking at IP SLA and was wondering whether there are any appliances around which emulate Ciscos IP SLA so that you can use it as a responder, or even better, the transmitter end? Have you found any? I'd be very interested in commercial solution also. Prefe

Re: [c-nsp] lsd

2012-04-25 Thread Christophe Fillot
Aaron wrote: Is there something similar in IOS to lsd (label switch db) found in IOS XR ? does this function of lsd exist in ios? (lsd seems like what I used to understand as lib/tib but unsure at this point). if there is an lsd-type thing in IOS, is there a way to see client apps (l2vpn, bgp,

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 - Software Redundancy

2012-02-01 Thread Christophe Fillot
Antonio Soares wrote: Here's how to do it (asr1004): conf t platform shell end request platform software system shell rp active Then you have Linux :) Unfortunately not on the latest IOS-XE releases: ASR_x#request platform software system shell rp active Activity within this shell ca

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1000 - Software Redundancy

2012-02-01 Thread Christophe Fillot
Antonio Soares wrote: Strange, I'm running 3.4.2S. Can you try after adding the "service internal" into the global configuration ? I already had it in the config. Same message if I remove it. I'm using 3.4.0aS: asr1001-universalk9.03.04.00a.S.151-3.S0a.bin Maybe newer releases don't have th

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS VPN with PE over GRE tunnels

2011-09-20 Thread Christophe Fillot
Gert Doering wrote: Hello, There was something about the 6500 architecture that certain combinations of ingress and egress need packets to go through the forwarding plane twice, and you need to enable "packet recirculation" for it to do that. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/cat

[c-nsp] Enabling CFM globally on a 7600

2011-04-21 Thread Christophe Fillot
Hello, I would like to run CFM on a Cisco 7600 (IOS 15.1(2)S), but when I use the command "ethernet cfm global", I get the following message: Apr 21 11:00:56.519: %CFM_CONST-SP-3-MATCH_REG_GLOBAL_RESERVE_FAILED: Unable to program port ASIC MAC match register on one or more slots. Cannot run

Re: [c-nsp] 12.2.33.SRE Train and Dynamips

2011-01-18 Thread Christophe Fillot
Shahid Shafi wrote: Hello, Is anyone able to run 12.2.33 SRE train with Dynamips? I am trying to run it on NPE-G2 and NPE-400 with no luck. My routers keep crashing without any rhyme or reason. I also tried to decompress the image and bumped up the memory to 1 Gig but still no success. Please le

Re: [c-nsp] Warm reload in Cisco 6500

2011-01-04 Thread Christophe Fillot
Keegan Holley wrote: Is traffic still forwarded during the reload? It's not explicitly mentioned whether or not the reload is control plane only. The "reload warm" command is not available on 12.2(33)SXI4a for sure (I've just checked it). The warm reload feature works by loading and uncompr

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Cease - Connection collision resolution

2009-04-03 Thread Christophe Fillot
Paul Stewart wrote: Hi, On a peering session we started getting the following: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 198.32.XXX.XX 6/7 (cease) 0 bytes This all started when we "upgraded" to 12.2(18)SXF16 it seems or at least the timeline matches up.. So, I've discovered that

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Cease - Connection collision resolution

2009-04-03 Thread Christophe Fillot
Paul Stewart wrote: Thank you - but what is the solution to my problem or is there one? By the sounds of it I need to change out the IOS to a new version;) In theory this should resolve automatically, but it is abnormal if your session never establishes. If this began to happen with 12.2

Re: [c-nsp] Does traffic routing through a PE get an MPLS label added/removed?

2008-12-02 Thread Christophe Fillot
TiM a écrit : I'm sure that ingress traffic is assigned some internal "you're in VRF x" label, but our SE was clear in stating it would be an MPLS header added and removed, the same information as if it was egressing towards Site 2/3. IMHO, you're right. Just consider the VRF-lite feature (es

Re: [c-nsp] AS5300 RAM

2008-02-18 Thread Christophe Fillot
Justin Shore a écrit : > Does anyone know if there's a certain ROM version or jumper setting that > required to support more than 32MB of RAM in an AS5300? I've tried > upgrading one of our old 5300s to 128MBs twice now. The first RAM > supplier was a questionable source. The second vendor was

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco SAA

2007-12-03 Thread Christophe Fillot
Jefri Abdullah a écrit : > B#1(config)#rtr ? > % Unrecognized command > > > Is my 12.2(25)EWA10 doesn't support SAA measurement? > The "rtr" command has been renamed. Does "ip sla" work instead ? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] VS-S720-10G-3C

2007-11-06 Thread Christophe Fillot
Tim Durack a écrit : > Documentation for the VS-S720-10G-3C is starting to show up on Cisco's > site. They are referring to it as Virtual Switching System 1440 by > virtue of it being a multi-chassis solution. The Supervisor itself > looks to be a rev of the SUP720. > The homepage is here: http:

Re: [c-nsp] 3660 Hot Swap?

2007-11-02 Thread Christophe Fillot
Justin Shore a écrit : > I could be wrong but I don't think any NM modules are hot-swappable. > Ditto for *(V|W)ICs. I could be wrong though. > The 3660 supports OIR for the NM, but not the 3620/3640: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps359/products_tech_note09186a00800c8282.sht

Re: [c-nsp] Extracting serial numbers from Show techs ?

2007-09-06 Thread Christophe Fillot
kevin gannon a écrit : > Does anyone know of or have a script that will take in a "show tech" > and extract the part numbers and serial numbers ? > > I know Cisco works does this but I want an offline tool that can > extract the information. That will handle things like seeing the > chassis serial

Re: [c-nsp] cpu usage of a 7200 npe-g2: disapointed

2007-09-03 Thread Christophe Fillot
Philippe Strauss a écrit : Hello, > Hello, > > We replaced a 7200 NPE400 with a NPE-G2 recently and are disapointed > by the CPU usage: this router switches ~80kPPS in+out (~180Mbps), it > was peaking at 55% CPU, now 40%, while the CPU clock is more that > 4 time higher on the G2. > > currently ru

Re: [c-nsp] 7201

2007-04-16 Thread Christophe Fillot
bill hulley wrote: >Just noticed various tech documents for the 7201 appear >on www.cisco.com, no product info or data sheets yet. > >I assume this is the NPE-G2 refresh of the 7301, with a few >interface tweeks and (at last) dual hot-swap PSUs. > > The "sh ver" on http://www.cisco.com/en/US/pro