-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:28:44PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 02/02/2012 22:03, Christopher J. Pilkington wrote:
> > I have seen this statement also on multiple occasions, but I
> > have not found the document showing this 500k
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:01:35PM -0600, Blake Dunlap wrote:
> You should note that lit is incorrect in regards to the FIB as was pointed
> out on the list a few days ago. Look lower in the document for the accurate
> numbers based on the included ESP. I believe it is only 500k ipv4.
I have seen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm looking at the new ASR100x series boxes.
We'll have 6 routers, each with a eBGP upstream and full iBGP
mesh. So, worst case, 6 full tables.
ASR1001 literature claims 1M IPv4 routes in the ESP
documentation, which I'm assuming refers to the FIB.
unctionality could be use such as
> for wireless with the vpn client.
>
> Just trying to find out what can be done right now.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher J. Pilkington [mailto:c...@0x1.net]
> Sent: Monday, 30 January 2012 3:16 PM
> To: Thomason, Simo
On Jan 29, 2012, at 22:28, "Thomason, Simon" wrote:
> Just did a quick search to see if the ASA would support Dot1x and does not
> look like they do as this might have been a different option.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your topology here... are these laptops
entering your network with a soft
On Jan 29, 2012, at 22:49, "Dobbins, Roland" wrote:
> It can be argued that the iPad is at least superficially more secure than
> general-purpose computers. If I were to differentiate access policies
> between iPads and general-purpose computers (which I can't imagine having a
> need to do),
We are rolling out a small network utilizing ME3400E in REP "ring"
topology, providing L3 "VPNs" using VRF-lite and OSPF.
Are there any particular pitfalls we should watch for with this
configuration w.r.t. rolling out IPv6 in the future?
___
cisco-nsp m
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
>
> DSCP 41 means CS4 or AF41 ?
A handy guide:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus1000/sw/4_0/qos/configuration/guide/qos_6dscp_val.html
-cjp
___
cisco-nsp mailing list ci
Fa0/1 is an access port, not a 802.1q trunk, the traffic on that
interface is not tagged, so the monitor destination will "see"
untagged traffic.
On Nov 10, 2011, at 19:38, Martin T wrote:
> Sergey,
> I modified the setup a little:
>
> http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/5736/interfacestrafficcou
