i've seen the first email and i was wondering, why would you have that setup?,
now seeing that others have it, i'm interested to see why, dynamic routing
would solve the issue, but why would you shutdown the loopback, loopback's
purpose is to be up at all times
__
9 09:59
To: Dan Sabau
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7600 eigrp offset-list problem
Same IOS here, similar code...
We use under address-family...
offset-list 0 out 25 Port-channel1.xxx
We will take a look to the config after a reboot.
We didn't reboot the router yet.
Do yo
Does any body know how to fix it?
The ios is: 12.2(33)SRC1 we have tried SRBx and the problem was there too.
10x
--
Dan Sabau
New Com Telecomunicatii SA,
Telefon: 0755049817
Email: dan.sa...@newcom.ro
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Dan Sabau
Manager NOC Cluj
New Com Telecomunicatii SA,
Telefon: +40-740078983
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-
o universal with some random hex... Apparently
> even the src-ip follows the same rule as the CEF load balancing.
> Too bad we can't change per port channel balancing :P
>
> Dan Sabau wrote:
>> Had the same problem, I've change the way etherchannel load balances
>>
orm? I have not tried this
> on any of the other equipment.
>
> Paul
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
;
>
>
> I've tried configure the port-channels, and insert the fiber cable, without
> success, does not connect.
>
>
>
> Please, someone knows something that I can do in the CatOS conff, than not
> buy a new module?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
--
Dan Sabau
TBM Invest
Manager Tehnic Date
0740078983
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
o this fine, right?
>
> Otherwise, what else would I be looking at, a 7301?
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/
ach day.
>
> It's difficult diagnosing the problem now. I need help pls.
>
> Regards,
>
> Felix
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nethe
o-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
--
Dan Sabau
TBM Invest
Manager Tehnic Date
0740078983
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dang
11 matches
Mail list logo