d in to
allow the SFP to slide out. I ended up having to push the 'release'
mechanism in with a screwdriver to pop the SFP out. Had to file those
SFPs in the bin.
Cheers,
David.
--
DAVID FARRELL
Technical Manager
Tibus
T: +44 (0)28 9033 1122
F: +44 (0)28 9042 4709
E: dfarr...@ti
On 26/06/2014 22:38, Nick Hilliard wrote:
I've seen several boxes running 15.0(2)SE and rebuilds suddenly die with
memory problems. The box would be fine for many months, then one day the
monitoring system would show that it had suddenly started losing ~1% memory
per hour and then would crash a
On 04/06/14 17:12, James Bensley wrote:
I'm new to both IOS XE and ASR's and whilst I have used ASRs with XE
and all seems well so far, it would be very handy to have a basic
config for an LNS to work from in case there is any major difference
from the more traditional 7200 series LNS we're all u
+1
On 27/03/13 16:18, Nick Hilliard wrote:
As this latest widely reported 300G spoof+amplification DDoS is causing
actual service harm to third party networks, could someone from Cisco give
some idea on when we can see uRPF on the ME3600/ME3800 product line up?
I really like these as PE boxes,
On 19/03/13 12:16, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Waris,
I would 2nd Nick on these points;
* Do you want to see Product Design Guide covering Platform best practices?
Solution based example configuration?
yes, very much so, e.g.:
- internal architecture design like Cisco publishes for e.g. the ASR9
Just to add my £0.02 worth.
We've been hit by issues in 15.2(2)S with respect to memory leaks in SSH
and also wacky forwarding behaviour in bridge-domains where
double-tagged frames are involved.
Not fun, but looking good thus far on 15.2(4)S2.
David.
On 28/01/13 14:21, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 08/11/2012 20:17, David Farrell wrote:
> > Only today I was taking Nick's approach to eeking out 2 x 7204s w/ G2s
> for
> > a few more weeks. I removed them from the DFZ and tore down around 120
> > direct
Only today I was taking Nick's approach to eeking out 2 x 7204s w/ G2s for
a few more weeks. I removed them from the DFZ and tore down around 120
direct peering BGP sessions. We now send them 8 prefixes each, including
default. TBH, this has had a negligible impact so I await the arrival of
ASR1ks
year. I'd be able to tell you better after that.
Hopefully this is a pointer in the right direction though.
Cheers,
David.
--
DAVID FARRELL
IP Engineer
Tibus
Hosting& Connectivity
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/tibus
T: +44 (0)28 9033 1122
F: +44 (0)28 9042 4709
E: d
hernet. Hosts are a mixture of L3 switches and routers, but
configuration should limit the extent of the broadcast domains in
question to exist only on the PtP link.
Cheers,
David.
--
DAVID FARRELL
IP Engineer
Tibus
Hosting& Connectivity
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/tibus
T
On 02/03/2012 14:55, David Farrell wrote:
On 02/03/2012 14:50, David Farrell wrote:
On 02/03/2012 10:01, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
I need a switch with PoE support and powered by 48V DC, do you know of
such?
TIA for any advice.
Hi Victor,
If you are looking for PoE access
On 02/03/2012 10:01, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
I need a switch with PoE support and powered by 48V DC, do you know of
such?
TIA for any advice.
Hi Victor,
If you are looking for PoE access switches, I believe the 3560-E and -X
series might be worth looking at as there are some DC po
On 02/03/2012 14:50, David Farrell wrote:
On 02/03/2012 10:01, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
I need a switch with PoE support and powered by 48V DC, do you know of
such?
TIA for any advice.
Hi Victor,
If you are looking for PoE access switches, I believe the 3560-E and
-X series
Hi Richard,
If you just want to guarantee the availability of the 'Sorry' service
would the secondarySorryServer config line suit requirements? Not true
load balancing but at least more than one 'Sorry' server in the loop.
Cheers,
David.
DAVID FARRELL
IP Engineer
Tibus
Hi Mark,
Yes, MQC is another motivation for looking at these and we're an all
Ethernet shop so they do fit well with our requirements in many respects.
Cheers,
David.
On 26/01/2012 16:04, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:49:11 PM David Farrell
wrote:
I've n
ted access rates on the Cat 3560s.
I'll contact our SE to seek some assurances about where the box is going
and what sort of development we should expect to see.
Thanks again!
David.
DAVID FARRELL
IP Engineer
Tibus
T: +44 (0)28 9033 1122
F: +44 (0)28 9042 4709
E: dfarr...@tibus.com
W
d
details any bad ones?
Cheers,
David.
--
DAVID FARRELL
IP Engineer
Tibus
T: +44 (0)28 9033 1122
F: +44 (0)28 9042 4709
E: dfarr...@tibus.com
W: www.tibus.com
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/tibus
Tibus is a trading name of The Internet Business Ltd, a company limited by
share c
17 matches
Mail list logo
