Hey folks, I'm trying to get the straight scoop on the licensing issue
I received an ME 3600x from my reseller, without the Advanced Metro license. I
did order the license from them. Is there a normal wait for getting it, or is
the reseller trying to smokescreen me? Or, should I have received
I don't see an eval license for "ME 3600X Advanced Metro" under Routers &
Switches
Much appreciated,
Eric Louie
619-743-5375
From: Reuben Farrelly
To: Aaron
Cc: Mattias Gyllenvarg ; Eric A Louie
; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thu, S
__
From: Reuben Farrelly
To: Eric A Louie
Cc: Aaron ; Mattias Gyllenvarg
; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thu, September 27, 2012 3:34:47 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Advanced Metro license, ME-3600
The Eval license does not require a license be obtained from CCO. Only
permanent non-expiring licen
Thanks all for all the help.
I got 2 60-day eval licenses from licens...@cisco.com
Got them tftp'ed and installed (license install flash:filename) and now I have
the AdvMetroIPAccess enabled.
-e-
From: Ivan
To: Eric A Louie ; cisco-nsp
Sent
I'm inheriting a problem that I could use some ideas to troubleshoot.
Speedtesting from within my core to other locations within the core give me
"asymmetrical" performance. I've traced the routes and the path is the same
download and upload, but I'll get very good download speeds (30Mbps) and
I've been reading and studying but I'm still not quite getting a few concepts
down around it.
I'm looking for the relationship between the labels and transparency through
non-MPLS routers, if there is any, and the relationship between VRFs and
labels. Anyone have any guidance for me?
Much ap
Are sub-interfaces supported on the ME3600x? Or is there some special formula
that I need to enable them?
Cisco IOS Software, ME360x Software (ME360x-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2(4)S,
RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
License Level: AdvancedMetroIPAccess
License Type: Permanent
interface GigabitEthernet0
Service instances are Cisco's 2012 way of doing subinterfaces:
conf t
int g0/1
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan none
service instance 100 ethernet
encap dot1q 100
stuff
things
service instance 200 ethernet
encap dot1q 200
stuff
things
On 2012-10-26, at 1:37 PM, Eric A
Thanks Thomas. That's definitely an option - it was my 2nd one. The plain old
subinterfaces, like on a router, don't work on this platform, apparently.
Much appreciated, Eric
From: "t...@flashstudy.de"
To: Eric A Louie ; Cisco NSP
S
We implemented what seemed to be a pretty simple mpls configuration to test a
vrf config.
It caused widespread havoc across my production network.
Has anyone encountered a situation where they've put "mpls ip" on a link and
had
it cause problems with web browsing to the Internet, even on traff
Eric
From: Oscar Belmar
To: Eric A Louie
Sent: Tue, January 15, 2013 4:45:57 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] mpls ip creating traffic disturbance(s)
Did you change system or link MTU?
OBM
El 15/01/2013 21:27, "Eric A Louie" escribió:
We implemented what seemed to be a pretty simple mpls c
Tim - yes, over the link, I believe you're right. The traffic was getting
affected even if it didn't traverse that link.
Much appreciated, Eric
From: Tim Warnock
To: Eric A Louie
Sent: Tue, January 15, 2013 4:31:12 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] mpls i
no summarization (yet), Andrew. This is all inside an ospf area 0 network.
Much appreciated, Eric
From: Andrew Jones
To: Eric A Louie ; Cisco NSP
Sent: Tue, January 15, 2013 6:09:09 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] mpls ip creating traffic disturbance(s)
Do you do
ated, Eric
From: Tim Warnock
To: Eric A Louie
Sent: Tue, January 15, 2013 5:18:08 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] mpls ip creating traffic disturbance(s)
Be sure to use:
ip mtu 1500
and
ipv6 mtu 1500
on every interface otherwise as your IGP grows you may run into breakage.
> -Original Message-
I had two interfaces configured for vrf. No vrf lite configured.
I used vpnv4 on the MP-BGP configuration, pointing to respective loopback
interfaces.
Much appreciated, Eric
From: Pete Lumbis
To: Eric A Louie
Cc: Cisco NSP
Sent: Tue, January 15, 2013 7
Thanks Mattias. Where did you increase your MTU?
Much appreciated, Eric
From: Mattias Gyllenvarg
To: Eric A Louie
Sent: Tue, January 15, 2013 10:43:58 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] mpls ip creating traffic disturbance(s)
We hit the "dont forget too inc
I just put in this command on my upstream interfaces to help my mpls network
pass traffic - that is, my effort to eliminate fragmentation in my backbone.
Is anyone else using this method of "mtu control"? I need some support - my
CEO
is asking why I have to do this, and who else does it, and i
the good news is, I'm the provider network and it's my backbone.
the bad news is, I have a mixed environment, Foundry/Brocade and Cisco.
Much appreciated, Eric
From: Mack McBride
To: Eric A Louie ; Cisco NSP
Sent: Mon, February 11, 2013 12:54:50
Much appreciated, Eric
From: Saku Ytti
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Mon, February 11, 2013 12:33:53 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ip tcp adjust-mss
On (2013-02-11 11:56 -0800), Eric A Louie wrote:
> Is anyone else using this method of "mtu control&quo
ure out that I could increase MTU on the two mpls
ip
interfaces...)
Much appreciated, Eric
From: Richard Clayton
To: Eric A Louie
Cc: Cisco NSP
Sent: Tue, February 12, 2013 5:04:19 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ip tcp adjust-mss
Eric
I needed to use this command t
I've run out of port capacity on my 7206VXR and need to go to "the next router"
or put in another 7206VXR side-by-side.
Any recommendations on what to use if I were to replace my existing 7206VXR
with
another chassis? (it's limited to 5 GB interfaces, and we need 7 or 8)
Much appreciated, Er
root with no password?
root / cisco?
does the password recovery process work?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps628/products_password_recovery09186a0080094184.shtml
then you can do a show flash, maybe.
From: Howard Leadmon
To: cisco-nsp@puck.
Platform ME-3600X, IOS 15.2
I've got point to multipoint connection on the GigE interface, a base radio and
2 sector radios. I've been trying to get both a VRF SVI and a non-VRF SVI to
work over that same physical interface.
Here's what I've done so far:
1. Created a no switchport physical
I have a c7204VXR NPE-G1 1GB RAM 6 GigE (3 on the NP, 1 on the I/O, and 2
PA-GE). Passing about 150Gbps of traffic. It's taking a full eBGP feed (470k
routes), and connected to a peering fabric (30k routes so far).
When I turned up the peering fabric, I spiked the cpu for about 5 minutes and
rding rate and the RAM capacity.
I'm not adverse to upgrading the 7206VXR with the NPE-G2
>
> From: Erik Versaevel
>To: Eric A Louie ; Cisco NSP
>Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:38 PM
>Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Advice - c7200VXR with 2 bgp
I'm preparing to recommend how my company should engineer the MPLS connections
within our backbone. I'd like some feedback.
Right now, I have a suggested workaround that reduces the MSS on the upstream
Internet interfaces, so that we keep the TCP payload at 1400. This is due to
asymmetrical t
...and, after months of doing nothing and leaving the adjust-mss command in, I
actually forgot why they were there, and what the effect was, and even that it
was 40 bytes smaller than the MTU. So I ended up breaking the TCP flows that
were marked DF again, and in the end, I'm taking the "high r
I'm getting ready to do an upgrade from a 7204VXR with 6 GigE interfaces to an
ASR 1002-X, basically one for one interfaces and configuration.
Is there anything I need to watch out for, either hardware-wise or
software-wise when moving the configuration? (other than the typical
nomenclature/in
The reseller I'm working with says "It's less expensive to order the bundled"
ASR1002-X and that the AES and AIS are the same price so it doesn't matter
which Advanced you order.
>
> From: Adam Greene
>To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>Sent: Wednesday, February
I encountered a strange problem that I'm hoping is a bug.
Directly connected routersMTU 9200Works fine with single IP addresses
As soon as I put a secondary address on both interfaces (one VLAN, one physical
interface), the MTU allowed magically decreased to 1477. 1500 byte packets
with DF set w
On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:28 PM, David Coulson
wrote:
What platform? What code?
Can you post your interface config?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 16, 2014, at 9:22 PM, Eric A Louie via cisco-nsp
> wrote:
>
> I encountered a strange problem that I'
31 matches
Mail list logo
