Re: [c-nsp] HSRPv1 and HSRPv2

2012-08-17 Thread Gmail
d's. When you first turn > on v2 on a single router, the two will stop talking so be prepared for the > outage on v4. > > David > > -- > http://dcp.dcptech.com > > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:cisco-

[c-nsp] HSRPv1 and HSRPv2

2012-08-17 Thread Gmail
Hi Experts, Understood that such question need to real test in the lab, but don't have same series equipment so far, so... Does anybody have any experience to configure the HSRPv1 and HSRPv2 in 7609, the thing is the current network just deploy IPv4 service, running some sub-interface with HSRP

[c-nsp] ASR 9000 inter- AS MPLS

2012-07-12 Thread Michal Grzybczyk ( GMAIL )
Hi, Anybody knows if it is possible to enable on one ASR9k machine 3 functions as P, PE and ASBR router in inter-AS MPLS topology ? For local core - P and PE is working but is it albo possible to exchange routing and labels with other AS using EBGP. Then we mix local services ( VPN ) with others

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR - ICMP inside MPLS between LOOPBACKs int

2012-06-21 Thread Michal Grzybczyk ( GMAIL )
t allocate labels? But this mode is not on by default adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michal Grzybczyk ( GMAIL ) Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:43 AM To: Cisco-NSP Subject: [c-nsp] IOS-XR - ICMP i

[c-nsp] IOS-XR - ICMP inside MPLS between LOOPBACKs int

2012-06-21 Thread Michal Grzybczyk ( GMAIL )
Hi, I have interesting behavior when I test my MPLS configuration on ASR 9000. Cisco IOS XR Software, Version 4.2.0[Default] I tried to ping between ASRs inside VRF, creating some Loopback interfaces simulating CE side and it failed. I was workng on it some days, configurations looks good and

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco EFA progress

2012-02-23 Thread Gmail
g a certain criteria. > > -Hammer- > > "I was a normal American nerd" > -Jack Herer > > > > On 2/23/2012 9:04 AM, Gmail wrote: >> Thanks, Jack. Understood! Do we need to buy any special service from Cisco, >> not just SmartNet? Because it will

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco EFA progress

2012-02-23 Thread Gmail
n official writeup from the Magistrate explaining what > the issue was. > > We've had a few good ones. Including "solar flares caused your device to poop" > > -Hammer- > > "I was a normal American nerd" > -Jack Herer > > > > On 2/23/2012 7

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco EFA progress

2012-02-23 Thread Gmail
Ok. Before the RMA? Cisco will give us which kind of report? Depend on what? Thanks and regards, Xu Hu On 23 Feb, 2012, at 21:10, "Arie Vayner (avayner)" wrote: > Hi, > > You need to request this from the TAC engineer BEFORE you start the RMA > process. > > Arie > > -Original Message--

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco EFA progress

2012-02-23 Thread Gmail
Account team? You mean they will give you the analysis report? Thanks and regards, Xu Hu On 23 Feb, 2012, at 20:45, Chris Evans wrote: > I've always gotten it from our account team. > > On Feb 23, 2012 6:02 AM, "许虎" wrote: > Hey Guys, > > Is anyone know the EFA progress of Cisco RMA? > > Th

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS TE conver from IOS to IOS-XR

2012-02-23 Thread Gmail
I know, but my situation is auto-tunnel mesh. Thanks and regards, Xu Hu On 23 Feb, 2012, at 19:35, "Vitkovsky, Adam" wrote: > In XR you’ll configure it the same - “path-option 1 dynamic” or “path-option > 1 explicit name” under the tunnel-te interface > > adam > __

Re: [c-nsp] 12.2(33)SRE5 real-world opinions

2012-01-31 Thread Gmail
We had already upgrade to the SRE5 from SRD5. For now everything is ok. Sent from my iPhone On 1 Feb, 2012, at 6:00, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > I'm looking to upgrade from SRC4 to SRE5 and I'm wondering if there are any > gotchas, hiccups or non-public bugs that anyone might have experience with.