Re: [c-nsp] VXLAN with EVPN CP

- Från: adamv0...@netconsultings.com Skickat: den 29 augusti 2018 22:32 Till: Gustav Ulander ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Ämne: RE: [c-nsp] VXLAN with EVPN CP And this is just between the Nexus9k themselves or with ASR9k in the mix as well please? adam netconsultings.com ::carrier-class

Re: [c-nsp] VXLAN with EVPN CP

Hello. 9K here if its any help? //Gustav -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of adamv0...@netconsultings.com Sent: den 27 augusti 2018 20:04 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] VXLAN with EVPN CP Hi folks, Is anyone running VXLAN with EVPN Control-Plane success

Re: [c-nsp] router suggestion for backup link

Depending on featureset a good old L3 switch might be applicable? //Gustav -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: cisco-nsp För aptgetd Skickat: den 10 juli 2018 06:44 Till: cisco-nsp Ämne: [c-nsp] router suggestion for backup link Hi, Can anyone provide suggestion outside cisco ASR/ISR rou

Re: [c-nsp] LACP Nexus vpc down after server reboot

We have had some issues with VPC over non networking hw. Works great towards our Juniper switches but is a pain to all things EMC more or less. Its hit and miss towards some IBM AIX machines. It gets broken quite often when they patch the AIX machines. I would be abit careful running VPC to non

Re: [c-nsp] Core layer device n7004 vs n9396px

How much routing are you going to do? Nexus platform is still a switch so it really depends on what features you need and not just the number of 10Gbit ports. NCS 5k platform could also be a contender perhaps? //Gustav -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun..

Re: [c-nsp] BGP-EVPN vs Traditional Nexus 7k/5k Design

Hello. Lots of if and buts in the BGP E-VPN and VXLAN solution including some not so nice bugs. Documentation isn't really clear on some of the pitfalls either. I would suggest a heavy testing period more so than usual perhaps. Since you are running L3 on all those 1u boxes make sure that you u

Re: [c-nsp] IPerf alternative

Hello We use some small computers similar to Intel NUC to work as probes in our POPs and DCs. We get them for like 200 USD or similar and use them for Netrounds. //Gustav -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of CiscoNSP List Sent: de

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Asr920 hw with ios-xr would be interesting depending on price. //Gustav -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] För Erik Sundberg Skickat: den 25 april 2017 20:22 Till: Pete Templin ; Gert Doering ; CiscoNSP List Kopia: cisco-nsp@puck.nethe

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences?

[mailto:s...@ytti.fi] Skickat: den 4 februari 2017 01:38 Till: Gustav Ulander Kopia: Adrian Minta ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Ämne: Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences? On 4 February 2017 at 02:01, Gustav Ulander wrote: Hey, > We are able to enter the configuration and were also

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences?

BFD-default60 Static 9600 9600 0 001234567 //Gustav -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi] Skickat: den 3 februari 2017 20:01 Till: Gustav Ulander Kopia: Adrian Minta ; cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences?

Hi Gustav, How bad NCS5501 not SE variant is oversubscribed ? From the data sheet "up to 800 Gbps of system throughput" fall short of the total 48x10 + 6x100. Does NCS5501 has a LPTS/CoPP implementation similar with ASR9k ? Many thanks in advance ! On 02/02/2017 10:56 AM, Gustav Ulander w

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences?

ustav -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Aaron [mailto:aar...@gvtc.com] Skickat: den 2 februari 2017 23:14 Till: Gustav Ulander ; 'James Jun' ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Ämne: RE: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences? Gustav, do you just do an igp-core like ospf with ldp for label adv

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences?

Hello. We are using NCS 5001 in this role with great success haven't had any issues with it. They seem to be just working although that's not that surprising given that its not that complex of an environment. We don't do OSPF-TE or RSVP-TE though so on that I cannot comment. //Gustav -O

Re: [c-nsp] 3rd party dwdm 80km optics in asr 9001

. On a different note and more on the lines of your email I find it interesting that the optics suppliers produce optics with different coding. -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Ulrik Ivers [mailto:ulrik.iv...@excanto.se] Skickat: den 19 oktober 2016 22:48 Till: Gustav Ulander ; Cisco

Re: [c-nsp] 3rd party dwdm 80km optics in asr 9001

recode the optics as Anders said bellow. //Gustav Från: Adam Vitkovsky [mailto:adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk] Skickat: den 28 september 2016 13:39 Till: Gustav Ulander ; Shawn L ; Cisco Network Service Providers Ämne: RE: [c-nsp] 3rd party dwdm 80km optics in asr 9001 > Gustav Ulander >

Re: [c-nsp] 3rd party dwdm 80km optics in asr 9001

> however we use varies MPAs for the 9006/9010 with third party dwdm > xfp/sfp+ no issues. > > On Sep 28, 2016 6:42 AM, "Gustav Ulander" > > > wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > Iam woundering if anyone has had issues running 3rd party optics in >

Re: [c-nsp] 3rd party dwdm 80km optics in asr 9001

Yea same here it has caused some delays for us. We have ordered optics from another supplier to se if that’s a way forward however it seems rather unpleasant. //Gustav Från: Curtis Piehler [mailto:cpiehl...@gmail.com] Skickat: den 28 september 2016 12:47 Till: Gustav Ulander Kopia: Cisco

Re: [c-nsp] 3rd party dwdm 80km optics in asr 9001

Hello. Iam woundering if anyone has had issues running 3rd party optics in the built in optics ports of a ASR9001 . We have some 80km DWDM optics that we get module is not supported for. We tried with transceiver permit pid all. We have similar SR-MM modules installed in the same machine that is

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 stops routing unexpectedly

Hello. Our experience is that if you are not happy with the engineer that is assigned you can always escalate to their suprevisor and ask for another engineer to be assigned. //gustav -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] För Eric Van Tol

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 "console" port....ugh

Yepp have had many onsite techies informing me of impending doom since the machine is broken... //Gustav -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] För Adrian Minta Skickat: den 2 februari 2016 19:30 Till: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Ämne: Re: [c-

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - sweet...got one in the lab

Hello Aaron. That sounds nice could you give any feedback when you have done some more tests with it? We are looking at it as a replacement for our 6.5k P boxes. The spec sheet says that it would be a good fit but it would be interesting to get your opinion on them. :) //Gustav -Origina

Re: [c-nsp] RFC 7432 (EVPN) support CPE devices.

Hello. Does anyone have any experience with any CPE that supports RFC 7432? I know it is available in ASR9k but we would like to have a local CPE to hand it of to the customer. As far as I understand there isn't one out yet that supports int? The present solution would force us to switch all tra

Re: [c-nsp] Readvertising strangeness.

Hello. Got a tip of list to try and change the label mode which I did. Configuring the PE router with the IPV4 peer with per-ce and a reboot solved it for CSR1000v. :) //Gustav -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gustav Ulander

Re: [c-nsp] Readvertising strangeness.

closest to what iam thinking). //Gustav -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gustav Ulander Sent: den 17 november 2015 11:04 To: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net' Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Readvertising strangeness. Hello people. I

Re: [c-nsp] Readvertising strangeness.

Hello people. I have some strange things going on here. Iam doing some test configurations in the lab and are trying to see how 2 AS numbers behave when they peer via their respective route reflectors. I am using CSR1000v for this lab as a start. I have 2 AS numbers to start with. Every AS has 1

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR/CSR VXLAN

Hello. Iam quite curious regarding this also. As far as I understand you bind the VTEP interface to the L2 part of your network with a bridge-domain. Iam thinking that you could assign a BDI interface to the same bridge-domain? Logically it makes sence but I haven't tried it since iam lacking

Re: [c-nsp] The Family of ASR902 - ASR903 - ASR907

Hello. +1 also //Gustav -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dan Peachey Sent: den 28 oktober 2015 13:16 To: Waris Sagheer (waris); cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] The Family of ASR902 - ASR903 - ASR907 On 28 October

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431

o.com] Sent: den 4 juni 2015 04:58 To: Gustav Ulander; Gert Doering; Nick Cutting Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431 Gustav, Have you looked at smart licensing? I am hoping that should simplify the process. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431

Hello all. My take is that a consumption based sales model can be good as long as you are not hindered in your work because of it. Hate when you have some late night work to be done that can't be completed because of some weird restriction dependent in some way on a license. RTU licenses are

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300

Hello. We are really happy with them L2 wise. Routing features are abit immature we feel. //Gustav -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of CiscoNSP List Sent: den 25 maj 2015 20:05 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Nexus

Re: [c-nsp] Fwd: BGP Signalled VPLS on ME3600

Hello. Do you have a corresponding entry in the mpls forwarding database for the next hop address? Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Communication & Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobi

Re: [c-nsp] Terminating lots of double-tagged vlans

Yes same here we terminated a couple of hundred doubletagged Vlans in a couple of our 3600X with EVCs works like a charm. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Communication & Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax

Re: [c-nsp] Choosing Switches to Support VM Clusters

We scrapped a bunch of 3560X after they suffered packetdrops on interfaces. Running 4948-E now and have been happy since. :)Gustav UhlanderCommunication & Infrastructure EngineerSteria ABKungsbron 13Box 169SE-101 23 StockholmSwedenTel: +46 8 622 42 15Fax: +46 8 622 42 23Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03gus

Re: [c-nsp] GRE Throughput

: +49-89-35655025                        g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de___cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.nethttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsparchive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/[bilagan "att99999.dat" bor

[c-nsp] Ang: Making SUP720 cope better under BGP load

Hello Simon.We are using asr1k for peering purposes and Sup2T in the core. We also have some sup 720 as PE routers.We find that the ASR1001 is alot faster at establishing our BGP sessions than both sup 720 and 2T. I would look into the ASR9001. Seems to be much better box than an ASR 1k box when yo

Re: [c-nsp] Recommended P Nodes

We went with 6500 and sup2t for our P routers.Although today i would probably go for the ASR 9001 for theese things since you often do not require the ammounts of interfaces a 6500 plattform can hold.And you get IOS-XR with the ASR9k which is a plus.Pe is 6500 with sup7203B or me3600x for smaller s

Re: [c-nsp] 2960 -> 4948 - no more drops :)

Hello.Same here. Use theese for top of rack and some L2 distribution.Away with packetdrops. :) Gustav-cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net skrev: -Till: CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list Från: Dan Letkeman Sänt av: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.netDatum: 2013-02-17 00:51Kopia: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether

Re: [c-nsp] Copper SFP with ME3600X

We have the same issue. Booth on the 3600 and the ASR1001. From what we gather only some Copper SFPs are working. GLC-T is a hit miss type of thing. When using 3rd party SFPs it seems that using ones that dosent support 10/100/1000 but is fixed at 1000 mbit almost always solves the issue. Could it

[c-nsp] Ang: WLC with DHCP relay not working on in VRF

Hello Nasir.If you look at the DHCPD debug it mentions a different VRF. Dec  6 13:42:16.829 CET:   DHCPD: table id 1 = vrf VRF_GuestIt mentions vrf VRF_Guest as opposed to vrf Guests which would be the expeted one. Do you have a vrf namned VRF_Guest or know where that might come from? Gustav Uhland

Re: [c-nsp] ISP Dual AS

Hello.We also run separate ASN. One for internet and one for VPN purposes. Gustav UhlanderCommunication & Infrastructure Engineer-cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net skrev: -Till: "'mert ozkul'" , Från: Adam Vitkovsky Sänt av: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.netDatum: 2012-12-06 15:21Ärende: Re

[c-nsp] Ang: ME3600X Output Drops

We have the same problem on our 3600X devices. Look at bugg CSCua16046We belive that is the bug that we are encountering. Havent updated software on the device yet though.-cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net skrev: -Till: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netFrån: "Ivan" Sänt av: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.n

Re: [c-nsp] Confirmation of Gigabit Ethernet autonegotiation behavior

Hummm BT does it here in sweden also. And yes same complaints here. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Communication & Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan

Re: [c-nsp] IPAM for Service Provider - BRAS GGSN

Hello. We went with PHPIpam in the end. Only other competitor for us was Efficentips system. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Communication & Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +4

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS with WS-X6724 and WS-X6704-10GE

tachment "attfs5p8.dat" deleted by Gustav Ulander/SE/Steria_SC] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _

Re: [c-nsp] Best Ipam software?

Thanks for some great feedback. I looked into the NOC project also but found the instructions rather lacking if you dont do russian. IPPlan is on our list for further tests then. Thanks a bunch. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Communication & Infrastructure Engineer Steria

[c-nsp] Best Ipam software?

Hello everyone. I was a little bit curious as to what people are using to handle and manage their ip address spaces? I’m primarily looking for a system that can handle multiple instances of the same subnet existing. We are doing Outsourcing so we have a bunch of customers with overlapping Ip a