Re: [c-nsp] Weird Frame-relay / L3 connectivity problem

Hello Kenny what was Cisco reply for this problem ? Thanks Ibrahim Abo Zaid , CCIE#27702 On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Kenny Sallee wrote: > > > > > > > > What's the providers take on this? The problem initially appears to be > > in th

[c-nsp] Backup edge port

ieved ? I think of using STP but I'm not sure if edge ports can help if edge port of switch 2 is in blocking state Any suggestion ? Thanks Ibrahim Abo Zaid CCIE#27702 (Service Provider) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether

[c-nsp] Question about LLQ

erface bandwidth can be used by non-priority classes and this amount = total interface bw - [ Reserved BW ( Def is 25% of interface bw) + priority classes BW] I need to know if both are correct ? is it depends on interface types ? Thanks Ibrahim A

[c-nsp] RSVP and TE bandwidth management

s the tunnel ? and if RSVP isn't used as QoS to guarantee BW in TE-links , how BW can be reserved for different LSP on TE-link ? i can think only about assigning each tunnel with EXP value and apply policy-map matches different EXP and assign BW , any other thoughts ? Thanks --Ibrahi

Re: [c-nsp] neighbor remove-private-as don't work on PE-CE

ideas ? On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Roger Wiklund wrote: > Have you tried local-as no-prepend replace-as. That should only show > the local-as in the path, and thus you can manipulate it that way. > > Regards > Roger > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Ibrahim Abo Zai

Re: [c-nsp] neighbor remove-private-as don't work on PE-CE

sorry guys , but i already tried as-override and remove private before posting :) here is the topology to give you a wider image about the topology Cory plz check the topology as i said before , i need CE1 to see the routes of CE2 without 64550 in as-path i hope you got me now On Wed, Oct 6,

Re: [c-nsp] neighbor remove-private-as don't work on PE-CE

yes you got me now but as you know , in route-map configuration i can only prepend to the as-path no delete i mean that prepend action adds a given number of occurrence of specific ASN to the current AS-Path but it doesn't modify it it can't be used to remove/delete some AS strings from it so ho

Re: [c-nsp] neighbor remove-private-as don't work on PE-CE

Hi heath sorry i didn't make it clear but i was using local-as between them and i want PE router to appear to CE as it belongs to different AS (with private ASN) but the updates from PE to CE contains real ASN number only not the private one plz ignore the previous description thanks On Wed,

[c-nsp] neighbor remove-private-as don't work on PE-CE

Hi all I was labbing some bgp features and i have PE-CE and there is eBGP peering between them using private-asn on CE I tried to remove private as numbers from updates advertised to PE with no chance any ideas why that don't work ? I think this features don't work with PE-CE but works normally

[c-nsp] CCIE lab in Hong Kong

Hi all I'm planning to schedule my CCIE SP lab in Hong kong but i need some information about the lab location there for those who attend there can tell me more about their impression about lab location ? best hotels with affordable rates and near Cisco office ? is it better or Sydeny or US locat

[c-nsp] SP seat in Brusseles

Hello Gents i looking for SP seat in brusseles in Dec but the earliest avaialble seats in April 2010 does any one have a seat end of Dec and will drop it ? i need it urgently and ready to take it over thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.n

[c-nsp] Multiple virtual-templates under one bba-group

Hi group I have a problem and need to know is it possible to define multiple virtual-templates under single bba-group and if yes , how BRAS selects between them ? based on what conditions ? thanks for your help --Ibrahim ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisc

[c-nsp] open-source nccm tool

Hi i'm looking for open-source nccm tool , can you advise if anyone has a suggestion thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] nccm tools

Hi i'm looking for a light and free nccm tool , can you advise if anyone has a suggestion thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-n

Re: [c-nsp] dynamic global-vrf leaking

also is there any feature supports dynamic export of VPN routes to global ? i knew the reverse exist (importing IPv4 routes into VRF) but i'm looking for the reverse On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid < ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi group > &g

[c-nsp] dynamic global-vrf leaking

Hi group Iam looking for a feature can be used to route VPN internet traffic from global interface into VRF interface (or global and add VPN label) normaly , that is done using static route to perform global-vrf leaking but i'm looking for a more scalable and dynamic solution any ideas ? than

[c-nsp] combing 7600 power supplies

hi group i have a problem and will need to combine the power supplies of 7609 router (changing the mode from redundant to combine) based on your experience , is this step can take the router down if one power supply is enough now but i need to insert new modules so i need to combine the other one

Re: [c-nsp] SNMPv3 bug on 3550

Hi All Iam facing the same below issue on 7200 with 12.2(25)S image does anyone face the same problem ? is it a bug ? thanks --Ibrahim On Thu, Feb 7, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote: > Sorry about the "empty" mail before, was busy wiping up coffee from my > keyboard. :-) > > I've teste

[c-nsp] IP route analysis solution

Hi all i'm looking for IP route analysis solution that can discover and draw a topology for the network and helps in planning process by simulating any modifications i did some googling and find 2 solutions in this area , Packet Design Route Explorer and HP RAMS do u have other ideas ? what are

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF LSA Type 11

HI Hash i already knew that Cisco support Inter-AS TE but without IGP running between ASBRs and it still depend on LSA 10 to flood TE attributes internally check this link http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/gsintast.html so i want to know if Cisco supports Inter-AS TE with

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF LSA Type 11

Hash Aminu wrote: > >> RFC 3630 is silent about type 11 LSA as an extension to MPLS TE, you can >> read RFC 2370 to know more on Opaque LSAs >> >> >> Good luck >> >> >> Hash >> >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid <

[c-nsp] OSPF LSA Type 11

Hi i want to know the role of OSPF Opaque LSA Type 11 in MPLS TE ? thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS TE and PIM

esnt work with multicast-intact feature. > > HTH > > Swap > #19804 > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid < > ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I have a question about PIM , is PIM messages can flow across MPLS TE >

[c-nsp] MPLS TE and PIM

Hi I have a question about PIM , is PIM messages can flow across MPLS TE Tunnel ? why PIM neighborship can't be established over the tunnel ? thanks --Ibrahim ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinf

[c-nsp] SP seat in brussels in May

Hi All is there anyone booked a seat for SP in brussels in end of feb or start of Martch and will drop it ? thanks --ibrahim ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck

[c-nsp] MPLS T.E Autoroute problem

Hi All I have strange behaviour with MPLS T.E with autoroute Topology R4 (AS100) | | R1---R2---R3---R5 -> (AS 200) |-Tun13-| both AS200 runs OSPF (single area) and Tunnel13 on R1 is between R1-Lo0 and R3-Lo0 and as shown R5 is reachable from R3 the problem is when e

Re: [c-nsp] ISIS Adj-filter problem

10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks > i L110.10.2.2/32 [115/10] via 10.10.123.2, FastEthernet0/0 > R3# > > > Thanks, > > Victor Cappuccio.- > vcapp...@cisco.com > CCIE(R/S) #20657 > STAC Support Engineer > Cisco Small Business Support. &

[c-nsp] ISIS partition avoidance

Hi All Does any one knows why ISIS partition avoidance is needed ? according to DocCD To cause an Intermediate System-to-Intermediate System (IS-IS) Level 1-2 border router to stop advertising the Level 1 area prefix into the Level 2 backbone when full connectivity is lost between the border rou

[c-nsp] ISIS Adj-filter problem

Hi All I was testing ISIS Adj-filter option , R1,R2 and R3 are connected over ethernet switch (using dynamips) with the below configuration the configuration works for adj point and both R2 and R3 have ADJ with R1 only , the problem is R2 is droping R1 and R3 LSPs and debug shows it is dropped du

Re: [c-nsp] ISIS Problem

Hi all To make it clearer , i don't have a problem with default route on R1 i have a problem with the default route on R2 and R3 best regards --Ibrahim On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid < ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All > > R1 isn't sett

Re: [c-nsp] ISIS Problem

gt; From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto: > cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ibrahim Abo Zaid > Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:47 PM > To: cisco_nsp; ci...@groupstudy.com > Subject: [c-nsp] ISIS Problem > > Hi All > > I have a problem with the below ISIS toplog

[c-nsp] ISIS Problem

Hi All I have a problem with the below ISIS toplogy , All ADJ of R1 are L1 and interface between R2 is in A2 from R2 side and in A3 side from R3 side so R2 and R3 have L2-ADJ betwene them , as expected both R2 and R3 send LSP with ATT bit set so R1 has 2 L1 default routes point to both R2 and R3 ,

[c-nsp] ISIS Mesh group question

Hi All I have a question about ISIS mesh groups which is used to reduce LSP flooding in full-mesh p2p enviroments , that means we lose redudacny for sake of LSP flooding reducation hence it affects forwarding and traffic is forced to inactive or interfaces in different groups only . is that right

[c-nsp] HSRP and Standby router

Hi All I was studying some HSRP senario which is little bit different than what used to work on , we have 2 routers connected with access ports to internal box which has 2 direct physical layer-2 links to both routers and HSRP is running between VLAN SVIs on both routers across L2 ether-channel be

[c-nsp] HSRP and Standby router

Hi All I was studying some HSRP senario which is little bit different than what used to work on , we have 2 routers connected with access ports to internal box which has 2 direct physical layer-2 links to both routers and HSRP is running between VLAN SVIs on both routers across L2 ether-channel be

[c-nsp] 7600 router and Etherchannel across multiple line card

Hi All I am trying to establish L2 Etherchannel between 2 7609 routers , SUP720-MSFC3 , PFC is 3BXL and Line cards WS-X6148-GE and IOS is * 12.2(33)SRD* are there any concerns to establish this etherchannel between ports in different line cards ? best regards --Ibrahim

Re: [c-nsp] C4K_PKTPROCESSING-5-NOTAPPLYINGACL

Hi David from Cisco Error MessageC4K_PKTPROCESSING-5-NOTAPPLYINGACL:Not applying [input/output] Acl for packet [packet-info] ExplanationThe software has not taken the ACL actions because it could not determine the correct ACL entry indicated by the hardware. The hardware-provided index

Re: [c-nsp] ebgp load balancing using maxiumu-paths TCAM impact on Sup720-3BXL?

Hi Peter If 2 upstream provider provides exactly same routes with same attributes so BGP will select 2 routes to each destination then TCAM will reach its maximum as installed BGP routes will be doubled but if some destination are preferely reachable from one of them and 2nd route will be backup r

[c-nsp] Dynamic NAT on router and ASA

Hi All i have NAT and PAT configured on ASA 5520 and it works as expcted from ASA , NAT all incoming connection 1:1 untill NAT pool is depepated than PAT all next connections but actually , NAT pool never get depelated and ASA started to use PAT pool although there are free IPs in NAT pool and th

Re: [c-nsp] SVI always up !

Hi Peter I tested it and it works -:) thanks for your advice best regards --Ibrahim On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote: > On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 14:53 +0300, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: > > That seems it will work but it is applied globally for all VLAN , is > >

Re: [c-nsp] ip tcp mss on sup720

Hi Javier if you configure it under interface , it will affect transit traffic and i think global will affect locally orginated or terminated traffic and you won't need this best regards --Ibrahim On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Javier Liendo wrote: > hi, > > on a cisco router if i want to

Re: [c-nsp] SVI always up !

Thanks Peter That seems it will work but it is applied globally for all VLAN , is there any way to apply it per-VLAN ? best regards --Ibrahim On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote: > On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 13:12 +0300, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: > > I have a strange situ

[c-nsp] SVI always up !

Hi All I have a strange situation and i think it is normal but i need a solution for it I have 2 MLS and VLAN x is created on both and there is L2 etherchannel between both and it allows all VLANs , when all access ports in VLAN x in any MLS got down SVI is always up although all access ports are

Re: [c-nsp] Sup720 Errors - Revisited

Hi Paul I think it is a phsyical problem with this chases , may be due to the position or electrical conditions causes some sort of biasing for memory ASIC and leads to this reload loop you can start check chaises postition , electrical isolation , grounding and supply and tenperature and if it

Re: [c-nsp] The mechanics of SSO

Hi Ross actually i can't get if SUP running SSO why you think configuration will be loaded from active to standby during switchover ? ! SSO maintains control plane and data plane resiliency and both SUP have active IOS image and synchronized configuration best regards --Ibrahim On Wed, May

Re: [c-nsp] GSR12008|GRP-B|4OC12/ATM-MM-SC|3GE-GBIC-SC throughput?

Dear Jason I think ATM cell tax will be about 13% on average based on the following ATM cell tax is composed of 2 parts 1- ATM over-header (5 bytes for each 53 byte cell and that is a fixed percnt ) 2- cell padding which depends packet distribution so ATM overhead will be 5/53 = ~ 4% and cell

[c-nsp] stateful dynamic traffic forwarding solution

Hi All I am looking for IOS feature or solution can do the following , there are 2 hosts A and B from the same subnet , when host A connects to host B , router should forward traffic to next-hop X while when host B connects to A , router should forward traffic to next-hop Y both A and B are rand

[c-nsp] default route and PBR set ip next-hop

Hi All I was checking when routers PBR traffic to certain NH , it checks if NH route exit in routing table or not , if exist , traffic is PBR and if not traffic is normally routed so my question is , if there is a default route , will it considered a valid route to reach the specified NH or thi

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast RPF check and unicast default route [7:134602]

Corporation > 7400 N. Shadeland Ave., Suite 245 > Indianapolis, IN 46250 > Office: (317) 348-0099 > Fax: (317) 849-7134 > arohy...@dpsciences.com > http://www.dpsciences.com/ > > > -Original Message- > From: nob...@groupstudy.com [mailto:nob...@groupstudy.com] On Be

[c-nsp] Multicast RPF check and unicast default route

Hi All i have a question about multicast RPF check that checks routing table for source address and ensure traffic incoming interface is the same as route next hop does this check supports default routes ? is there a feature like allow-default used in uRPF ? best regards --Ibrahim _

[c-nsp] rotary-like dynamic NAT pool

Dear All i was searching for dynamic NAT technology that utilize the NAT pool in rotary fashion for inside source addresses like rotary NAT technology does for destination addresses best regards --Ibrahim ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.net

[c-nsp] CCIE Lab tools

Hi All I have a question about CCIE Lab exam , we heard many stories about some exam trick and IOS bugs which causes technologies to fail and losing point so is there any tool available in the exam to identify if there is IOS bug cause this problem ? i know there is documentation tool but that sta

Re: [c-nsp] Mpls Troubleshooting Question

sorry as both sites have different networks so you can't use this technology On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: > Hi Rocker > > that doesn't seem to me as MPLS VPN topology as both PE1 interfaces to CE1 > and CEZ are non-MPLS interfaces , i

Re: [c-nsp] Mpls Troubleshooting Question

Hi Rocker that doesn't seem to me as MPLS VPN topology as both PE1 interfaces to CE1 and CEZ are non-MPLS interfaces , it is much like local-switching scenario try using CONNECT command best regards --Ibrahim On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Rocker Feller < rocker.rockerfel...@gmail.com> wrot

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

ge. One very > useful thing is the ability to compare the feature sets, Base / Services > / Advanced Enterprise etc.. > > Mark. > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers &g

[c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

Hi All I'd like to know the differneces between IOS trains according to your experices with them SXI , SXH , SXF and SXD best regards --Ibrahim ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp arc

[c-nsp] VRF-Lite and VRF Source-select

Hi All I was reading about VRF Source-select feature and want to know is this this supported with VRF-Lite or needs MPLS-VPN backbone ? best regards --Ibrahim ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [c-nsp] AToM Lab Problem

-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto: > cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wayne Lee > Sent: quarta-feira, 4 de Fevereiro de 2009 21:11 > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] AToM Lab Problem > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid <

[c-nsp] AToM Lab Problem

Hi All I was labbing AToM scenario and uses IOS 12.2(33)SRC for ATM AAL5 and ATM Cell-relay feature but i can't get dynamips run for this image , it always results "*** Error: 209-unable to start VM instance " error messages any body lab this feature using different image or know how to fix this

Re: [c-nsp] network connection tool

ve > > > > Andrew Gristina wrote: > > > netcat > > > > > > > > > http://siliconrust.blogspot.com/2006/04/what-do-you-do-to-emulate-server.html > > > > > > Quick tutorial on how to emulate a server. I guess that is what you > are &g

[c-nsp] network connection tool

(that will be different for each application) and try some sort of ping or connect-attempt across FW to isolate is it FW problem or application problem ? is there any tool out there can help in that best regards --Ibrahim Abo Zaid ___ cisco-nsp mailing

[c-nsp] MPLS Label question

Hi All MPLS Lable Untag removes all labels from MPLS packets and sent it as native IP packet my question is packets with untag label will be sent over IP interface not MPLS interface and FIB lookup occur prefixes with this tag ? best regards --Ibrahim _

[c-nsp] MPLS VPN Problem - EoS conflict

Hi All I was implementing MPLS VPN topology and by mistake i was configuring PE-LP used for MP-BGP peering with a worng mask /24 instead of /32 (remote PE-LP mask is /32) . by T.S , i discovered that P router upstream of this PE was dropping incoming MPLS packets with the below error message t

[c-nsp] VPLS Question

Dear All i have a small question about VPLS , MAC address of remote CE hosts learned from remote PE are assigned the same VC label at local PE or each mac address has VC label assigned or each CE VLAN has the same VC label ? best regards --ibrahim ___

[c-nsp] IOS

Dear All I have a question about a IOS Command and i can't find alot of documentation around about it , the command is *service internal* from global configuration mode , i can see it provides extra show and debug commands but like what ? when it should be used ? thanks for help --Ibrahi

[c-nsp] Strange beahvior of Catalyst 6509

Hi All we had Cat 6509 gear running 12.0(7)XE1 image on MSFC , we faced a strange behavior as all servers and clients connected to a VLAN can't exchange any packet size exceeding a certain limit although no configuration is used to limit that and no IP reachability problem exist the problem has

[c-nsp] hierarchical MPLS VPN

feature is supported by *mpls topology-driven-lsp *command , what about Cisco IOS ? ** ** best regards --Ibrahim Abo Zaid ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Interface Queues

> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 06:05:49PM +0300, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: > > Hi All > > > > i am a bit confused between Interface queues that can be configured using > > tx-queue-limit and hold-queue , what is the difference between these > queues > > ? >

[c-nsp] Interface Queues

Hi All i am a bit confused between Interface queues that can be configured using tx-queue-limit and hold-queue , what is the difference between these queues ? appreciate your replies . best regards --Ibrahim ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck

Re: [c-nsp] giant packets troubleshooting

Dear Palis check interface MTU configuration and its default state from both sides best regards --Ibrahim On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Michalis Palis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On one link for example where we have an etherchannel between a GSR and a > 4510 switch, we see a lot of giant

Re: [c-nsp] BGP auto-summary [7:131926]

Hi Ajay if auto-summary is enabled with classful network command, all spesfic routes will be summarized to class boundary so for the below example , only 10.0.0.0/8 will be advertised best regards --Ibrahim On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Ajay Chenampara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I

[c-nsp] BGP route-orgination

Dear All i just want to share a point with you , if we used network command to originate BGP route , the route NH will be automatically set to local BGP router-id while if we used redistrbtion the route preserves into NH independent of local router-id so next-hop-self should be used is that compl

[c-nsp] Frame-relay broadcast queue

Dear All i was reading about Frame-relay broadcast queue which reserves by default 25% of PVC CIR and takes precedence over normal traffic as it queue routing updates by default , 25% of interface bandwidth is reserved for control traffic , does this reserved bandwidth is the broadcast queue ?

[c-nsp] Frame-relay broadcast queue

Dear All i was reading about Frame-relay broadcast queue which reserves by default 25% of PVC CIR and takes precedence over normal traffic as it queue routing updates by default , 25% of interface bandwidth is reserved for control traffic , does this reserved bandwidth is the broadcast queue ?

[c-nsp] RIP Sanity check

Hi All i have a question about RIP sanity check and FR hub and spoke topology , when exchaning routing updates between spokes through the hub , hub relies the updates not re-generated them so these updates are discarded @ spokes due to sanity check and so it needs to be disabled @ spokes interface

[c-nsp] Split Horizon defaults

Hi All i was reading about RIP route summerization which requires Split horizon to be disabled in order to advertise summaries (auto or interface summaries) but as i know Split horizon is enabled or disabled by default based on interface type so i want to know the default settings of split horizon

Re: [c-nsp] IGP & iBGP Configuration Problem in Transit AS

Hi Vira the simplest solution for both problem i can think about is GRE tunnels between A , G , H headed at A which will act as RR as well best regards --Ibrahim On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Vira W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Cisco gurus, > > > I have a network topology in this URL :

Re: [c-nsp] ICMP PAT

described in this link, it says "sequence number" > while it should say "identifier". So IOS only creates a single flow for > continuous pings (ping -s foo), but creates multiple flows if you > execute ping multiple times (as the identifier changes).. > >

Re: [c-nsp] eBGP via loopback

also i want to draw attention that when establishing eBGP over loopback it will need ebgp multihop to be configured as well because the default TTL over directly connected interfaces is 1 and in case of loopback it is reachable over just single hop some IOS version defaults multihop to 255 so the

Re: [c-nsp] ICMP PAT

Hi Oli I read that @ http://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk648/tk361/tk438/technologies_white_paper09186a00801af2b9.html best regards --Abo Zaid On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ibrahim Abo Zaid <> wrote on Tuesday

[c-nsp] ICMP PAT

Hi All according to Cisco docs , if ICMP PAT is configured , ICMP packets sequence numbers are associated to ports in NAT table means a continuous traffic between a source and a destination can create up to 65535 entries in NAT table !!! is that right , 65K entries for single flow ? best rega

Re: [c-nsp] If BGP is running on a circuit, if you ping the other end you get loss. kill the BGP (and thus the traffic..) no more loss.

Hi Drew when you shut the peering with a neighbor , the routes was received from this neighbor withdrawn from both BGP or IP routing tables so traffic will take other available routes so it is normal that the traffic over the trunks will drop and hence ICMP traffic will find a room . but the que

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS MTU and Jumbo frames

are a mix - 7609/12410 on the P/PE, and on access (before MPLS), > 3550 and 2950. > > I saw that 2950 has limitation on the maximum frame size: > > 2950G(config)#*system mtu ?* > <1500-1530> MTU size in bytes > > tks, > Alaerte > > > >

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS MTU and Jumbo frames

Hi Alaerte the answer depends on your hardware platform and used IOS so send us your cisco gear "show version" best regards --Abo Zaid On 4/26/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Any restriction regarding enabling MPLS MTU when using ethernet frames > of up to 1548 byt

Re: [c-nsp] 2801 bandwidth limiting

Hi Dan add bandwidth 100 command under the ethernet interface terminates this connection and shaping should work , we'll need shaping instead of policing best regards --Abo Zaid On 4/25/08, Dan Letkeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Luan, > > I have tried this, but it doesn't seem to tak

Re: [c-nsp] Core to access links. Use single etherchannel?

Hi Grant i think there is no way to do that in software unless u can get Giga Ethernet bundling modules but the other way is to rely on routing protocols instead of L2 features best regards --Abo Zaid On 4/23/08, Grant Moerschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Greetings all. We have a 6509 core

Re: [c-nsp] Redistributing static routes in BGP

Yes Gary this is a default behavior performed by BGP Scanner process which validates NH reachability and manages BGP advertisements and BGP doesn't advertise routes not exist in RIB but if u configure a static route with NH as IP instead of interface , even if the interface went down and its conne

Re: [c-nsp] GbE over SDH

Hi MKS does your EOS ESP supports Link capacity adjustment Scheme (LCAS) ? if yes , so its SNMP MIB should contain some objects about links failures and restoration so you can monitor these condition via SNMP Traps . best regards --Abo Zaid On 4/23/08, MKS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi li

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3550-12G VSI stops routing traffic

Hi Randal it is really a wired problem but i can suggest 2 causes 1- it might due to VSI interfaces or ARP table limitation problem 2- if you are running PVST , it might be due to PVST instances limitation at this IOS release but to make it clear lets gather some logs and statistcis 1- u mentio

Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP - modify distribute-list and EIGRP neighbor drops

(Ethernet1/0) is resync: peer graceful-restart > > > Rodney > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 07:08:46AM +0200, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: > > Hi All > > > > Yes , this is a normal behaviour to EIGRP to resync topology table > between > > neighbors after modifying

Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP - modify distribute-list and EIGRP neighbor drops

Hi All Yes , this is a normal behaviour to EIGRP to resync topology table between neighbors after modifying the redistribute-list best regards --Abo Zaid On 4/21/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sadly, it is. > > -- > Regards, > > Jason Plank > CCIE #16560 > e: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [c-nsp] Route reflectors, BGP router redundancy et. Al.

Hi Chris to complete this general discussion , i believe the other thing you need to do to to determine and configure your BGP peering policy Main/Backup ISP , route advertised to each peer , recieved routes . i believe the below link can be useful http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/hsrp_bgp.h

Re: [c-nsp] Private VLAN

ack best regards --Abo Zaid On 4/21/08, Pedro Matusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ibrahim Abo Zaid > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 4:13 PM > To: Manaf Oqla

Re: [c-nsp] Private VLAN

Hi Manaf and Pedro currenly i am preparing the configuration and will feed you shortly best regards --Abo Zaid On 4/21/08, Manaf Oqlah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > would you please send me the configuration in brief > > thank you > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5

Re: [c-nsp] Private VLAN

nario. > > Regards, > Manaf > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Manaf > > > > > > as you know primary VLAN can have one isolated VLAN only but have > > multiple community VLA

Re: [c-nsp] Private VLAN

-VLAN100 (Primary) > > > | > > > - > > > | | > > > VLAN200 (isolated) VLAN300 (isolated) > > > > > >

Re: [c-nsp] Managed internet VPN solution

ursive can > be used on the PE (haven't looked at the vrf-aware PBR feature which is > relatively new). > >oli > > Ibrahim Abo Zaid <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Monday, > April 21, 2008 10:46 AM: > > > Hi Oliver > > > > Site A co

Re: [c-nsp] Private VLAN

| > -VLAN100 (Primary) > | > - > | | > VLAN200 (isolated) VLAN300 (isolated) > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [c-nsp] Private VLAN

Hi Manaf what do u mean reach global vlan at L3 ? private VLAN provides L2 isolation and L3 should be transparent i mean you can keep hosts ip planning and routing policy should match with the L2 topolgy after configuring private VLANs . if you added more info about your problem or solution , it

Re: [c-nsp] Managed internet VPN solution

it to Site B? > > I don't know of PBR is a solution, it really depends on the routing > setup. Please bear in mind that the PE performs another routing lookup, > so PBR on the CE site B alone will likely not help. > >oli > > Ibrahim Abo Zaid <mailto:[EMA

  1   2   >