On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 19:50 +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 24/01/2012 16:50, Jake Khuon wrote:
> > Also be aware that single-view route-server is quite a different beast
> > than multi-view route-server. The latter case isn't handled by a
> > traditional router (at
r case isn't handled by a
traditional router (at least not well) and would typically be addressed
via software routers running on a generic unix platform of choice.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | --
ed high-volume fan.
I suppose you could also take a barebones cabinet and sound-suppress it
yourself with the egg-crate foam material.
--
/*=====[ Jake Khuon ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Ban
use the
switchport context. You can however use bridge-groups with routed
sub-interfaces.
--
/*=====[ Jake Khuon ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_|
want something prepackaged
and commercial it'll do the job. I did think the pricing was a bit
steep however.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon ]=+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | |
| for Effective Ban
