instead , the
tunnel
interface keep in the down state (it's line protocol)
tunnel mpls traffic-eng fast-reroute bw-protect
Am i missing something ?
You need to configure backup tunnel to protect the link first.
--
Regards,
Jefri Abdullah
Links:
--
[1] https://puck.nether.net/ma
On 2012-12-13 09:47 AM, Samol wrote:
Hi Aj,
that command can do without having to enable this. its like the
command
uses on windows "netstat?" so that see can see the active sessions
which
are goung thru router.
"show tcp brief"
--
Regards,
Jefri Abdullah
Lin
ac: 0024.c4c0.0b40, dmac: 9055.aea3.7c9d
mtu: 1280, vlan: 760, dindex: 0x0, l3rw_vld: 1
format: MAC_TCP, flags: 0x2000208408
delta_seq: 35584, delta_ack: 0
packets: 0, bytes: 0
--
Regard
On 2012-11-22 02:05 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Nov 22, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Jefri Abdullah wrote:
We've no idea why the incoming interface is NULL, and why this
packet
is punted.
Is the destination IP the box itself?
What does the output of sh proc c sorted show?
No the destinati
his packet
is punted. Do you guys have any clue about this?
--
Regards,
Jefri Abdullah
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On 12/3/07, Christophe Fillot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jefri Abdullah a écrit :
> > B#1(config)#rtr ?
> > % Unrecognized command
> >
> >
> > Is my 12.2(25)EWA10 doesn't support SAA measurement?
> >
>
> The "rtr" command has be
Dear List,
I've a number of Catalysts switch 4507 using 12.2(25)EWA1 IOS. This
catalyst running SAA service measurement and everything seems ok.
A#sh rtr responder
RTR Responder is: Enabled
Number of control message received: 17275 Number of errors: 2
Recent sources:
172.18.23.20 [15:49:4
Dear List,
I've two routers running ibgp as routing protocol, some how, one of
these router should advertise network 0.0.0.0 (via default-information
network statement) to another ebgp peer. But the ibgp peer should deny
to receive this network.
Trying this access-list but failed, because my rout
On 5/30/07, Doug Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I'm no expert, but signs point to either no route out from your
> gateway, or no return path back to the source of the ping from hosts beyond
> your gateway. Is your return path learned on upstream routers as well? Can
> you verify the r
On 5/29/07, Ian MacKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am running SXF8 on some switches in the lab, and I now see that SXF9
> is out.
try this:
boot system flash path_to_ios_bin_image
after that, reload the router
--
NULL
___
cisco-nsp
I've two router (7609 and 7606) running on two different site, this
site connected using 2 E1 link. I tried to bundled this link as 1 PPP
Multilink, but the router failed to forward packet if destination has
more than 1 hop.
edge01-jkt#sh ppp multilink
Multilink1, bundle name is edge02-mdn
Bund
11 matches
Mail list logo