Re: [c-nsp] Route Aggregation and Deaggregation

2012-07-19 Thread Jennifer Pruett
one of the /19's you advertise to ISP1 ISP2. If this is your intention, then go for it. No need to also advertise the /24 to ISP1 ISP2 unless you want some of the traffic for that /24 to come inbound on those links. regards, Tony. __**__ From: Jennifer

Re: [c-nsp] Route Aggregation and Deaggregation

2012-07-19 Thread Jennifer Pruett
Jen On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Jennifer Pruett jennypruet...@gmail.comwrote: Question for any BGP guru's; we have a couple of ASR routers as our border routers which are advertising a few /19's. The question

Re: [c-nsp] Route Aggregation and Deaggregation

2012-07-19 Thread Jennifer Pruett
. -- *From:* Sascha Pollok nsp-l...@pollok.net *To:* Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com *Cc:* Jennifer Pruett jennypruet...@gmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net *Sent:* Thursday, 19 July 2012 4:05 PM *Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Route Aggregation

[c-nsp] Route Aggregation and Deaggregation

2012-07-18 Thread Jennifer Pruett
Good day! Question for any BGP guru's; we have a couple of ASR routers as our border routers which are advertising a few /19's. The question is not directly related to the ASR hardware, but the process and best practice of aggregating PI assigned space. If we advertise our /19's via ISP1 and ISP2