Re: [c-nsp] Galvanic isolation for Ethernet?

2014-08-19 Thread Jerimiah Cole
On 08/18/2014 02:54 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: Do you know any devices to provide galvanic isolation for twisted pair Ethernet? If that's really what you want, try searching for isolation transformers that operate at ethernet frequencies. Jerimiah

Re: [c-nsp] Open Source netflow recommendations

2011-05-20 Thread Jerimiah Cole
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:04 -0400, Justin M. Streiner wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2011, Ge Moua wrote: If vendors start playing games with license fees per feature (to pad their revenues), then one either conform or work-around them. If this pertains to netflow, I've done something like the

Re: [c-nsp] BCP 38 on single-mode uRPF platforms?

2009-03-20 Thread Jerimiah Cole
Pete Templin wrote: ... I'm now leaning towards 'reachable-via any' on all Internet customer ports, with per-port (per-customer) ACLs to prevent spoofing. Aside from having to maintain those per-port/per-customer ACLs and a risk to multi-homed customers if 'reachable-via rx' gets triggered