Eric Hoelzle wrote:
http://www.apcon.com/solutions/?p=lab might be what you are looking for.
I've heard positive things about them but have not used them personally.
We are using Apcon Intellapatch Series 2000 in our lab (1G ports only,
no 10G), works very well for us.
Particularly useful is
On Tue, July 14, 2009 07:46, Stephen Fulton wrote:
> I'm looking for thoughts on the stability of 12.2(33)SRD releases (latest
> is
> SRD2) in general, as well as any experiences running it on the 7600/RSP720
> series. I'm connecting a SIP400/SPA-5x1GEv2 to a CWDM network, and only
> SRD
> support
On Tue, June 23, 2009 05:12, Shine Joseph wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone with SP experience state why would one choose pipe model over
> short pipe model or vice versa for deploying MPLS QoS?
With full pipe you get some nice benefits like the ability to classify all
user traffic only based on MPLS EX
On Mon, December 1, 2008 14:30, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2008-12-01 13:20 +0100), Johannes Resch wrote:
>
>> As others have pointed out, using service instances on ES/ES+ will not
>> require global VLANs, but this only applies for terminating plain PWEs.
>> For L3 subif/VPLS,
On Mon, December 1, 2008 13:02, David Freedman wrote:
> SIP/SPA does indeed provide per-port local VLAN significance for this
> platform, please prepare your wallet in such case :)
>
> Dave.
However, SIP/SPA still consume global (internal) VLAN resources per L3
subif..only the VLAN IDs need not ma
On Thu, September 25, 2008 13:23, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
> GLC-T works only in 1000 speed when in 67xx-SFP cards (hardware
> limitation?).
>
> We use 6748-GE-TX for 10/100/1000BaseT in our 6500s/7600s, so we have the
> same issue as you.
>
> Does anyone know what happens with the ES/SPA car
On Thu, September 4, 2008 09:07, Ryan wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Quick QoS question here. I seem to be having some trouble getting a policy
> applied to a Serial (T1) interface, and for the life of me donât
> understand why. Iâm pretty sure itâs my fault and not a âfeatureâ.
>
> Error I am get
Ben Steele wrote on 30.01.2008 01:05:
> Just stumbled across a router in our network currently sitting at 1535
> days of uptime, not to often you see that sort of uptime on a router
> these days, given this router does nothing important anymore though...
> in fact I think it's probably been f
