I have a few remote sites which can be prone to power failures. For
various reasons, implementing UPSs with management cards is not suitable
and/or desirable.
The remote equipment all supports Dying Gasp, however, but I cannot seem
to find a way to make my 7200s, 3800s, or 2600s to receive the DG
FWIW, the following is an old email I sent to our internal IT list last
year reinforcing our current practice of auto/auto on all ports except
where autoneg is proven to fail.
It's a bit of historical review of reasons to hard-set.
~ Begin ~
>> Why did we continue to use 100/full?"
Social inerti
As a datapoint, I was running NTP on ~315-340 devices against a
6500/sup2a for years before upgrading to a 720. Never had a problem. I
don't even think either sup noticed. :)
-porkchop
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] O
6500: One backplane failure in 120 chassis-years (number of chassis
running times the number of years they've been running).
4500: Zero in 20 chassis-years.
-porkchop
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
nm...@g
Packeteer (now owned by Blue Coat) will play with TCP window sizes as part
of their bandwidth management bag of tricks.
Packeteer can handle some complex shaping/management plans in a
understandable way. I strongly encourage anyone looking at bandwidth
management to take a look.
Staying on the Cis
Right now at one ~400 person site, I have 187 active local IPs sharing 1487
still-alive connections. Its your regular everyday sales cubefarm.
That's just shy of an average of 8 translations per active user. By those
numbers, you could have 8,000 salespeople on one PAT.
Personally, I'd cut it faaa
If you have a linux machine laying around (a default ubuntu install will
do...), drop it on the same subnet as either one of the two PCs. (only one
ethernet card needed)
Do:
iptables -A OUTPUT -p icmp --icmp-type redirect -j DROP
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root netem delay 45msec
echo -n 1 > /proc/sys/
Assuming you're using TACACS+ to handle this, since radius servers are
everywhere...
I've been using tac_plus from
http://www.pro-bono-publico.de/projects/tac_plus.html (there appear to be
several projects named "tac_plus", this was the first one to work well for
me.) As an added bonus, the author
On 8/12/09 9:31 AM, "Jeff Cartier" wrote:
> Does anyone know if a Cisco 6509-E w/ Sup720 & WiSM will support OIR?
> I've dug around Google and Cisco, but haven't found a concrete 'YES'.
> My gut feeling is telling me it's okay; but I figure I'd ask the group J
> Thanks!!!
I've done it several tim
rkchop
On 6/10/09 5:49 PM, "Shine Joseph" wrote:
> Yes it is in layer 3 mode
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ryan West"
> To: "Shine Joseph"
> Cc: "Kaegler, Mike" ;
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [
Boot the AP with the Mode button down to reset its parameter memory.
If that doesn't help, hook into console and watch the messages.
If that doesn't help, execute some 'debug [...]' statements on the same
console.
-porkchop
On 6/10/09 4:42 PM, "Shine Joseph" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A Cisco WLC4402 is
On 5/14/09 1:44 PM, "reflect ocean" wrote:
> Hi there.I run a medium-sized wifi network.We are cisco shop
> (autonommous access points).Recently wifi users number have reached
> limits we didn't expect.Because of that,we had to adjust our subnet
> network in order to support more users associated
There was a huge NANOG thread about this a few weeks ago...
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg15295.html
Because of the recommendations in that thread, I got out the credit card for
OmniGraffle, which despite being a generally unheard of mac-only product got
specific praise in perhaps mo
13 matches
Mail list logo
