[c-nsp] Cisco 6509 SUP2-MSFC2 and PCMCIA Flash

Is it possible that 128mb is too large amount of flash memory for the S2-MSFC2 to recognize? Does the Supervisor module only accommodate 64Mb max? We're having trouble with (MEM-C6K-ATA-1-128M) PCMCIA 128MB memory cards for the S2-MSFC2. No matter which of (4) S2-MSFC2 we put the memory cards in

[c-nsp] Cisco 6509 SUP2-MSFC2 and PCMCIA Flash

We're having trouble with (MEM-C6K-ATA-1-128M) PCMCIA 128MB memory cards for the S2-MSFC2. No matter which of (4) S2-MSFC2 we put the memory cards in we get: %Error opening slot0:/ (No device available) which is the same error as if nothing is in that slot. (We tried disk0: as well) Is there s

Re: [c-nsp] what is it with 3550s?

A quick search through our inventory and I see current used market prices are: WS-C3550-12G $675/ea - $875/ea WS-C3550-24PWR-SMI - $350/ea - $450/ea WS-C3550-48-EMI $315/ea - $450/ea WS-C3550-48-SMI $250/ea - $350/ea ~.~ Best regards, Larry E. Stites Acquisitions and Sales Northern Calif

Re: [c-nsp] alternatives to Cisco's SFPs

It's my understanding that Non Cisco SFPs which are Cisco coded have DOM ³Digital Optical Monitoring² specified in the part number description, which is what Cisco specs for these units. Does anyone else have information on determining how non Cisco SFP are Cisco coded? As far as 'lower quality' S

Re: [c-nsp] GSS and ACE

We recently supplied (4) ACE20-MOD-K9 to a customer overseas for $17k/ea. These units were previously owned spares, unused, box opened to inspect contents. All units were complete with sealed software package and EULA paperwork. The customer had a problem with recognition of the card in 6509 runnin

[c-nsp] ACE20-MOD-K9 Unknown   PwrDown

s) 112 Gigabit Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 1917K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 8192K bytes of packet buffer memory. 65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K). Configuration register is 0x2102 All help is appreciated - ~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~. Larry Stites NorCal

Re: [c-nsp] old 6513 chassis vs sup720

's > needed to get an old chassis to work with SUP720. ~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~. Larry Stites NorCal Networks, Inc. Nevada City, CA 95959 530-320-4194 530-265-2588 fax ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] Black Box TS027A-R2 used for testing Cisco gear

Anyone ever encounter this issue?: Using a Black Box TS027A-R2 ethernet tester to test the 10/100 ports rather than connect a device to every port on a WS-C3524-XL-EN. The Black Box tests ports successfully. Then to compare, the WS-C3524-XL-EN is configured and connected to devices rather than jus

[c-nsp] TEST

___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] Using Black Box TS027A-R2 to test Cisco Ethernet

Anybody familiar with using a Black Box TS027A-R2 Ethernet tester to test the 10/100 ports rather than connect a device to every port? We seem to get false positive results with it and have been advised by Black Box tech support not to use the TS027A-R2 or any standard Black Box Ethernet tester. B

[c-nsp] Black Box TS027A-R2 testing 10/100 ports on WS-C3524-XL-EN

. Because of how a Cisco switch handles the pulse from the tester, it can give false readings. The advised tester to use is the TPAM128335. IF you would please comment, confirm or advise otherwise. Regards, Larry Stites NorCalNetworks, Inc. ___ cisco