Working on XR 4.3.2 with Microsoft NPS/Radius here.
The only special config required was on the NPS side was an attribute
specifying the IOS XR IE task group.
Nothing special was required on the XR side - your config looks very
similar to what we use.
Mick
On 4 May 2016 09:31, "David Wilkinson"
gt;
> kind regards
> Pshem
>
>
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 at 13:09 Mick O'Rourke wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is anyone able to confirm if VASI is supported on the ASR920 currently, if
>> there are plans for it to be and or if there is a
Hi,
Is anyone able to confirm if VASI is supported on the ASR920 currently, if
there are plans for it to be and or if there is a potential or equivalent
way to achieve the same result on the 920?
Cheers,
Mick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.
Have you had a look at VASI and or nat match-in-vrf?
On 22 April 2014 18:30, Vladimir Buyalsky wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have ASR-1001 with two inet-channels and two default gateways. One from
> them i have put in VRF.
> Port, which connected to lan, and second channel belong global routing
> t
Out of interest, are your transit access interfaces sub-rate?
On 10 March 2014 06:41, redscorpion69 wrote:
> The BGP session went down, and stayed down for about 3 min, as if there was
> a problem for TCP to establish a session back on. It happened during DDOS,
> before and after that this sess
We've seen similar sounding problems before. A couple of suggestions for
things to look at:
The default F5 config is auto last hop ie. it will forward to the MAC
address of the SVI from which the traffic originated not the HSRP for
return traffic by default. Look for potential dynamic return path
What are you doing with the data?
In past roles we've had central collectors 400ms away from exports (UK) as
the data was only for support\ease of troubleshooting purposes. The data
was classified\tagged\queued etc in a particular way to travel across the
WAN along with voice and other business c
Wouldn't go near a 9000v it for a data centre deployment on AC power - no
dual AC option.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Gabor Szabo (gabszabo)
wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Have you checked the ASR9K nV Satellite feature with 9000v which can be
> placed physically as TOR device but works as a remot
Hi Chris,
We use an 8GB chip in 1001's.
He's a comparison of a default 4GB 1001 with similar output to yours vs
another 1001 with 8GB.
ASR1001 with 4GB memory
#sh version | inc mem
cisco ASR1001 (1RU) processor with 1188910K/6147K bytes of memory.
32768K bytes of non-volatile configuration memor
My experience is similar, I'd never recommend and upgrade to anyone from
8.2 to 8.3+ as the upgrade scripts for larger configs are imho more pain
then they are worth. A once what felt an efficient and supportable
config becomes
the complete opposite. Do it in the lab prior and fix all the
upgrade s
As a content network we do it directly for both 10GigE transit and 1GigE
transit into out 1k's and 9k's.
One of our up streams runs both 1k's and 9k's as well, but they terminate
customer access at switching layer port running sub nits per customer. It
works just as well as what we do given the re
This link has some detail on maximum connection profiles vs maximum VPN
tunnels
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa84/configuration/guide/vpn_groups.pdf
But i didnt see anything looking quickly on group policy - which is what I
assume your referring to by policy?
You've probably hea
What are you Cisco SP account team suggesting?
I can't speak on the C2851 replacement side of things or the 760x, but I
can offer something small on 1k's as border\transit routers.
Price doesn't seem to be hugely different between the ESPs 10/20/40.
If your looking at multi-gig - at assume sub-r
set origin igp
> set as-path prepend 1234
> !
>
> The function of it is to balance traffic for a particular HA scenario by
> matching a particular as-path, adding a pre-pend and doing some other things
> with MED values.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1
, adding a pre-pend and doing some
other things with MED values.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Mick O'Rourke wrote:
> It does yes.
> On Dec 12, 2012 9:54 PM, "Riccardo S" wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Does it works BGP prepending applied
>> wit
It does yes.
On Dec 12, 2012 9:54 PM, "Riccardo S" wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Does it works BGP prepending applied
> with a route-map in incoming direction ?
> I admit I saw it only in outbond
> direction….
>
>
>
> ie:
>
> router bgp 65221
>
> neighbor 10.111.232.62 remote-as
> 65010
>
> neighbor 10.111.2
Hi Andrew,
How many clients will associate? And how critical is it?
We run a couple of older/retired 1841 as ntp on IOS 15, stratum 2/3 - they
don't do anything else but do a good enough job with a few thousand clients.
On Jun 23, 2012 9:17 AM, "Andrew Miehs" wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Perhaps a litt
The X = a Sup7 in a box.
55k MAC. 128k ACL.
60 odd etherchannels and vrfs. Same same.
There was a nice thread with detail from the Cisco product manager here on
it a while back.
On May 23, 2012 7:04 AM, "Mark Tinka" wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:51:15 PM Gert Doering wrote:
>
> > Pure L2
> The 3750X is relatively new so I've only seen a few of them. Stackwise in
> general is pretty solid. I've never seen a whole stack fail. If a member
> fails the stack just keeps going, if the master tails a new master is
> elected.
For the most part my experience is in-line with the above, y
If your talking Windows 32 and 64bit I've had the same issues over the
years albeit it was by far the minority of machines that would have
problems:
- The easiest work-around in the end has been to use AnyConnect 2.3, 2.4
onwards to 3.x have all had the same result.
- Different result re: clicking
Had a look 6-12 months ago.
At the time there were some good MDM options externally or internally
managed that could be combined with AnyConnect always on VPN for Ipads
Iphones etc.
All combined well with any potential BYOD corp policy.
It's an interesting space. Well worth having a chat to your T
Is proxy arp is disabled on the ASA?
On 26/06/2011, Pete Lumbis wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Aaron Riemer wrote:
>
>> How does the cisco ASAs take care of this problem?
>>
>>
>>
>>
> The ASAs "own" the address so they will respond to any ARP requests for NAT
> addresses.
> _
22 matches
Mail list logo
