Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K interface counters

Great find! Thanks a lot, Brad. -- Nam On Jun 6, 2014 9:08 PM, "brad dreisbach" wrote: > > > On Jun 6, 2014, at 0:34, Nam NGUYEN wrote: > > Hi, > > Does anyone using ASR 9010 IOS-XR 4.3.0 encounter following issue with > A9K-40GE-L line cards? > > The R

[c-nsp] ASR9K interface counters

Hi, Does anyone using ASR 9010 IOS-XR 4.3.0 encounter following issue with A9K-40GE-L line cards? The Rx packets counter of interface Gi0/x/0/5 is always 0. Example output: RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:ASR9K-1#sh int gi0/1/0/5 | i minute Fri Jun 6 15:22:01.202 SGT 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/

Re: [c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 131, Issue 6

on managing the list at > cisco-nsp-ow...@puck.nether.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of cisco-nsp digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > >1. Re: Question configure QoS on ES20 Card, Cisco 7609

Re: [c-nsp] Question configure QoS on ES20 Card, Cisco 7609

any any I think it's ok but I couldn't see the counter. Please help me Thanks Nam On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Nam Nguyen wrote: > Hi ! > > at the end of acl i have defined permit ip any any: > - i need to block some traffic and permit the rest > > Nam Nguye

Re: [c-nsp] Question configure QoS on ES20 Card, Cisco 7609

Hi ! at the end of acl i have defined permit ip any any: - i need to block some traffic and permit the rest Nam Nguyen > On 26-09-2013, at 19:02, Tony wrote: > > Hi, > > The error message seems to be fairly clear, you can't have DENY statements in > ACL. > >

[c-nsp] Question configure QoS on ES20 Card, Cisco 7609

Hi all ! I have some problem when configure QoS on Cisco ES20 card: - When I applied policy-map on sub-interface (egress), I see error message: "%G_QOS_CLASSIFY-DFC2-3-QOS_CONFIG: error detected: Can not support deny ace in ACL (161)" - When I applied policy-map on sub-interface (ingress), It's

Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR Process Exhausted

t; > Hi Oil, this is not because of the MPLS/VPN number limitation? > > no, this has nothing to do with VPN license or the like.. we just don't > support a very high number of distinct OSPF processes, and achieve the > required VRF PE-CE scalability differently.. > > oli > > -- Nam Nguyen ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] IOS XR Process Exhausted

Hi experts, I have a few ASR9Ks used as PE routers. Due to customer's requirements, a lot of VRFs are created, each contains one OSPF instance. It seems the ASR9K has put a limit on the maximum number of OSPF processes. RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Jul 11 09:17:26.081 UTC: placed[333]: %OS-PLACED-3-PROCESS_EXH

Re: [c-nsp] All RRs down

Hi, The network now has 20 Cisco 7613s as P routers, 20 Cisco 7609s as PE routers, along with some other Huawei NE/NE40s as PE routers. RR is a must, I guess. On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:02:20PM +0700, Nam NGUYEN wrote: >

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

Running on a cisco 2621 (MPC860) IOS image c2600-telco-mz.123-15b.bin > > Regards, > Shake > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at

Re: [c-nsp] All RRs down

l die. Thank you! -- Nam Nguyen ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] All RRs down

forwarding table of a router remain unchanged if its RRs go down? Thanks. -- Nam Nguyen ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/