Re: [c-nsp] Whatsup Calls

* s...@ytti.fi (Saku Ytti) [Thu 02 Apr 2015, 15:49 CEST]: On (2015-04-02 13:06 +0300), M K wrote: Whatsup released voice recently , i wonder does Cisco SCE has the ability to block it ? Sorry, no clue. But from some responses you got, I'm emphatically people would keep political and commerci

Re: [c-nsp] Fibernet Telecom Group

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Wed 16 Apr 2008, 15:57 CEST]: >Does anyone have any experience with Fibernet Telecom Group? I am >mainly interested in their metro ethernet services. This is a mailing list about using Cisco equipment in a network service provider environment. Please st

Re: [c-nsp] L3 vs. L2 trunk connections to a 6509 core. Easy router-head question.

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Grant Moerschel) [Mon 14 Apr 2008, 19:50 CEST]: >Given my description of the 3560 (routing on, one SVI for VLAN1, one >trunk to the core), do you think that the local V8 traffic on the 3560 >is being routed via VLAN1 in contrast to being tagged and forwarded as >VLAN8 via th

Re: [c-nsp] 7200vxr-npe400/512mb - how much BGP?

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Skeeve Stevens) [Sun 13 Apr 2008, 16:55 CEST]: > Just how much BGP should a 7200vxr-NPE400 with 512MB of RAM be able to > handle. Are you seeing problems? I'm loading 1.8 million paths in exactly such a router, with plenty headroom. Some IOS versions leak memory like a si

Re: [c-nsp] External Firewall

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fred Reimer) [Mon 24 Mar 2008, 22:28 CET]: >Don't be giving out any NDA materials now... The ASR and its featureset have been announced and thus are public knowledge. -- Niels. -- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@pu

Re: [c-nsp] [OT] Driving 1310nm optics through 1550nm circulators

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gert Doering) [Wed 09 Jan 2008, 09:22 CET]: >On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:04:07AM +1100, Dale Shaw wrote: >> I need to connect some equipment (a router to a switch) via a dark >> fibre service. At each end, the service is presented as TX and RX on >> an optical circulator -- th

Re: [c-nsp] underruns error locally && inputs errors, runts and abort on remote interface

r a carrier with rare, special needs. >On Dec 12, 2007 9:17 AM, Ziad Majzoub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Niels, are you suggesting clock source internal , on both ends ? >> BTW there is definitely some SDH equipment on the path >> >> >> On Dec 12, 2007 7:

Re: [c-nsp] underruns error locally && inputs errors, runts and abort on remote interface

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ziad Majzoub) [Tue 11 Dec 2007, 04:07 CET]: >I'm seeing underruns errors on local STM1 interface, >on the remote router i'm seeing runts, aborts and imput errors >the controller is clean(during a certain period). Try switching both to line clock source if there is SDH equipm

Re: [c-nsp] cisco ASA using many time the same MAC and HP switches

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philippe Strauss) [Thu 01 Nov 2007, 17:45 CET]: >I've just noticed an interesting "feature": ASA firewalls use the same >MAC address for many interfaces, either VLAN interfaces "SVI" (5505) >or SubInterface (5520). Many if not most router platforms do that these days, in fac

Re: [c-nsp] 100Mbit SM fiber ports on Cat 65XX

>>>Robert Boyle wrote on 18/10/2007 10:17 : I am trying to simplify some of our POP setups. We frequently have a stand alone fiber transceiver rack shelf for conversion of a few 100Mbit SM fiber connections to 100Base-T. In our Foundry XMR gear, we can install 100Mbit SM

Re: [c-nsp] 7200VXR 12.0(31)S6 connect command for local switching

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Lixfeld) [Mon 10 Sep 2007, 20:45 CEST]: >Has anyone used the connect command in this train of code? I'm I think current list wisdom is to try 12.2SB or 12.4 mainline for this router. -- Niels. -- ___ cisco-nsp m

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco noob -- design guidance request

>> Where is the access list that is going to prevent cross talk between the >> subnets ? Otherwise rogueware on one tenants computer will attack the >> other tenants. Simply splitting each tenant onto its own vlan is ncie but >> its a far cry from secure if you tie the subnets into a router tha

Re: [c-nsp] BGP path preference

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Lewis) [Thu 30 Aug 2007, 17:13 CEST]: >On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Andy Dills wrote: >> Don't forget that you can prepend incoming announcements as well as >> outgoing announcements. > >This is what I'd do (and have done before) to even things out. Some would >argue that when p

Re: [c-nsp] VXR skips 12.2(31)SB6

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (roy) [Fri 24 Aug 2007, 08:42 CEST]: >Boot: >boot system flash c7200-p-mz.122-31.SB6.bin >boot system flash c7200-jk9s-mz.124-1.bin > >#sh bootvar >BOOT variable = c7200-p-mz.122-31.SB6.bin,1;c7200-jk9s-mz.124-1.bin,1; >CONFIG_FILE variable does not exist >BOOTLDR variable does

Re: [c-nsp] UDLD vs Auto-neg

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Church, Charles) [Wed 22 Aug 2007, 20:15 CEST]: >I think UDLD was originally designed for fiber, where there is no >auto-neg. Huh? No. Just because Cisco can't seem to get it working right in some product lines (e.g., a GSR won't autonegotiate on the secondary port in a

Re: [c-nsp] no mop enabled

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sridhar Ayengar) [Mon 25 Jun 2007, 02:01 CEST]: >Jared Mauch wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 01:05:22PM -0700, Curtis Doty wrote: >>> It's 2007. Do we really have to manually disable MOP on every LAN >>> interface if we don't want to see it in the protocol accounting and >>