Fiber fed ones aren't - but usually the copper loop fed ones are.
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam Korab
> Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 7:01 PM
> To: Richey
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subjec
I was able to get a copy from Amazon as a used copy.
2 new from $59.99 8 used from $39.95
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Felix Nkansah
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 7:42 PM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.neth
You mean DC rectifiers for turning AC into DC?
If you are going through the trouble, why not throw on a small chain of deep
cycles to smooth things out and let you run a bit in a power outage?
-Paul
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-bou
I think it makes my choice to use Adtran CPE well placed. Except for their lack
of IPv6 support *grumble*
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] on
behalf of Tim Franklin [...@pelican.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 20
> Feature Navigator is wrong - as usual. 3550 does not have hw support for
> IPv6, therefore no support for it. No plan, according to BU (have this
> info via our account manager), to support
> IPv6 on these switches. Go for 3560 or 3750
>
>
> Best Regards,
>Janos Mohacsi
Wh
You can subnet ipv6 with your eyeballs, just add or subtract 4 from the
prefix length for every character you move to the left or right.
1234:1234:1234:1234::/64
1234:1234:1234:123X::/60
1234:1234:1234:12XX::/56
1234:1234:1234:1XXX::/52
1234:1234:1234::/48
etc
-Original Message-
From: ci
We've got paying customers who came to us specifically because we
support it. Our last decision for IP transport had IPv6 as a
requirement. YMMV.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Granados
Sent: Wednesda
Dual Stack.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chintan Shah
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:08 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] IPV6 to IPV4
Hi,
The IPV6 host has to communicate to some IPV4
As far as I know, changing the router ID will take care of clearing the
BGP tables for you. :) It should reset all sessions.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Cartier
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:49 P
If you're asking about T1s, we've extended a demarc 23 stories over
Category 0 building pair from the 70s or 80s and the circuit has run
flawlessly. You have to test the cables when they're that old due to
building sway causing shorts and things like that, but it works. T1s are
designed to go sever
We use subversion, and giving web access to the repository through the
normal subversion frontend, no special additions, works for us, but our
needs have been basically just to get a last known good configuration to
blow onto a customer's replacement unit prior to dispatching a
technician. Works pr
We do this all the time in carrier scenarios, carrying voip. I've never
seen a problem with taking out members of ppp multilink groups at
random, and re-adding them at random. It might cause a packet or two to
drop when the link goes away unexpectedly.
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-ns
If I were you, I'd package up Rancid, call it "JoeWare", and bill them a
ton for it. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Joe Loiacono
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 4:57 PM
> To: Cisco-NSP Mailin
I have a ONS that I am backing up over TL1. If I run the program I wrote
to handle the TL1 manually, it works after a couple of tries. If I
connect in directly and type the commands, it runs properly almost every
time.
Running from cron, I always get an error about the database being busy.
Anyone
Most modern sonet gear does not provide clocking to individual DS1s
running it. The only reason clocking ever existed on point to point
circuits was that the older gear couldn't avoid being an active
participant in the circuit. It's possible the carrier you're using has
upgraded the equipment, and
That card handles E1s, not T1s.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco
> van den Bovenkamp
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:26 PM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PA-POS-1OC3 vs. PA-A3-OC3SMI
>
> David A
ch DS3 to the individual DS1's I need to add a TransMux card into
> the chassis. This would negate the need for the DS3's to be plugged
> into a VXR with a pa-mc-t3 card. Would one TransMux card be
> sufficient? What about for an OC12?
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2008, at 3:
If you want to do 1:1 DS3, that'd work. If you want to rearrange
individual DS1s, you need a TransMux card
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Aldworth
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:18 PM
> To: David Prall
> Cc: cisco-nsp
I just tried it on a 7206 VXR running 12.4 on an NPE-400, on a frame
relay t1 interface with a ping running, and there was no change in
packet loss or delay on addition or removal. I don't seem to ever have
had it cause any drops or resets on T1s or FastEthernet on the 7206 VXR
platform. YMMV.
---
No. We just told the customer to call Apple. I don't think that actually
solved our problem though. :(
-Original Message-
From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:59 PM
To: cisco-nsp
Cc: Paul G. Timmins
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MacOS9, AS53xxx and
I'm having a similar issue where my portmasters authenticate the user,
hand the L2TP session to our 7206VXR, and then that falls apart and
states invalid username or password. Our VXR is at 12.4(16)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pshem Ko
21 matches
Mail list logo
