Oh, you are not alone!
Greg Ferro has defined it:
http://etherealmind.com/network-dictionary-tacrathon/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c
Suspicious... I can't believe that... maybe 'defaced' ?
2008/9/25 Irena Nikolova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> And also without "t"s for some reason :)
>
> Irena
>
>
> 2008/9/25 Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Someone heard all of you and made www.cisco.com extra-light!
> >
> > --
> > T
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Rogelio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can a Cisco PIX "boomerang" a packet--i.e. route a packet coming from the
> internal network that is destined for an Internet host back into
> the internal network via NAT?
>
> I ask because I have have email clients poin
Hello,
anybody having a AS5350 with PRI(s) and asterisk running for
incoming/outgoing calls between SIP and ISDN/Analog is willing to post
as5350 config and asterisk config?
just to get straight to the core...
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.n
>
> Some people told me about cisco expectation for the future release... this
> speeds are achieved by authorizing only the connection on FWSM, and once
> authorized, passing connections to the supervisor and not on the
> etherchannel (to the supervisor forwarding engine). That's how they will
> m
>
> > As far as I heard, now a single FWSM can scale to 50Gbps if you have a
> > Supervisor 720-10G-3C and don't want stateful inspection...
>
> The FWSM has a 6x1GB Etherchannel connection to the switch, so 50 Gbps
> seems a little much. Even then, a FWSM without stateful inspection would
> be a l
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Christian Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> but FWSM scales to 4 per chassis, which is 2000 contexts, 20gbps throughput
> ..'on paper'...
>
As far as I heard, now a single FWSM can scale to 50Gbps if you have a
Supervisor 720-10G-3C and don't want stateful inspect
I'm sure you can have identity nat for two machines and PAT for others.
You must combine static commands with alias commands:
static (dmz,outside) publicip privateip netmask 255.255.255.255
alias (outside) privateip publicip 255.255.255.255
and then you can goal PAT for other addresses with nat a
Hi
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Gregori Parker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to enable a host on the inside to communicate with an identity NAT on
> the outside...essentially the ASA would be doubling up on translations,
In the past, with pix 6.3 and earlier, you achieved it with alias comma
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah why is there no traceroute command, sorrry not being clearer
This question only can be answered by cisco people, but I live with cisco
PIX (so then ASA and FWSM, we have a few) since version 4.4 and never was
this comm
what are you meaning?
why is not this command on the cli, o why they don't answer to traceroute?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > why is there no traceroute on the fwsm;s?
> > ___
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cis
>
> Turn it off.
>
> To borrow off Team Cymru's secure IOS template, "Don't
> pretend to be something you're not. :-)".
>
Disable it now.
Last week we changed some networks behind a nortel contivity to be behind a
FWSM / CAT6500. One of these networks is a mixture of routers and servers
spreading
I think the requisite is to have X67xx cards in both linecards to group
ports on them.
Anyone have any experience configuring etherchannel bundles across
> multiple, different linecards on a Cisco 6509 IOS based switch? For
> example we have a client who would like to have 3 x 1GE copper ports on
we are deploying fwsm, and that's a great environment for virtualizing fws,
but beware the limitations (no routing protocols when virtualized, ...)
before your purchase.
I received some comments about bandwidth, now they are supporting 5.5 Gbps
per blade, but cisco people says they will support up
Yes, you have to reach the console port and do show ver from console.
It's always a good thing having console servers when your equipment is far
from you.
regards
On Feb 9, 2008 5:27 PM, Afsheen Bigdeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hmm, this happened to me a few years ago. If I recall correctly,
15 matches
Mail list logo
