and links and BGP for everything
else. We do run BFD for ISIS. BGP runs on top of that. Nevermind.
-Robert
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 05:28, Robert Boyle
<<mailto:rob...@tellurian.com>rob...@tellurian.com> wrote:
At 02:55 AM 7/3/2009, Ian Henderson wrote:
Nick 'tarantul'
At 02:55 AM 7/3/2009, Ian Henderson wrote:
Nick 'tarantul' Novikov wrote on 2009-07-03:
> The question arises, why IOS XR can't run BFD with internal BGP peers
> (as old school IOS)?
Because its assumed you're already using an IGP with which you can use it?
What about those of us who use BGP
At 03:21 AM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
I just need to switch pvc from one OC3/STM-1 to another and configure
soft-vc's.
Have you tried L2TPv3? Quick, simple and it should do what you need.
There is no ATM QOS or buffering, but you can shuttle packets from
one port to another quite easily. We use
At 11:56 AM 10/1/2008, Jay Nakamura wrote:
It looks like Opti-3 have "Long" and "Short" option for LBO on the DS3
interface. I am going to make sure Verizon set it to short since the coax
is only about 15' long.
Even with short LBO, we still need the attenuators sometimes. Look
for LCV errors
At 10:18 AM 10/1/2008, you wrote:
I am stumped on a problem with our Telco here.
Jay,
Have you tried an attenuator on the DS3 RECV port on your PA-T3? Try
a 10db or a 13db. The signal from the Opti-3 is usually pretty high
and overdrives the RECV circuit. Although typically when that
happen
At 10:20 PM 9/30/2008, Paul Stewart wrote:
Yes, we own the end to end network however it's a routed network in those
segments...
router-->router-->router-->switch-->switch-->router-->router-->router-->rout
er specifically...;)
If we could hand them off a few VLAN's we would just do that and not
At 02:43 PM 9/18/2008, David Aldworth wrote:
We are looking for a fully channelized OC3 interface for a Cisco 7200
VXR. Something that we can break individual T1's off of. In
researching this there are two routes: PA-POS-1OC3 or PA-A3-OC3SMI.
The first is SONET and the second is ATM.
Other than
At 09:15 PM 6/13/2008, David Coulson wrote:
What does the VXR piece get you? I thought there was a huge
discussion about it, and the result was 'nothing'?
That is basically true. There are no cards for the VXR which use the
TDM bus. However, a VXR does allow you to use new NPE cards -400 -G1
At 11:15 AM 5/28/2008, you wrote:
>On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 01:44:36PM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:
> > VXR indeed added the TDM bus into the 7200 capabilities, which
> > essentially means you can use 'connect' or 'cross-connect' commands in
> > config mode to cross-connect DS0 between various PA/
Hello,
I remember that one of the big features of the 7200VXR series was the
new TDM bus which would enable TDM switching between cards. I have
never needed to use it, but now it would come in handy. I have found
lots of marketing info on Cisco's website, but no cookbook configs.
Here is the
At 08:43 AM 3/11/2008, you wrote:
>http://www.techworld.com/security/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=11665
>
>"Following the lead of Microsoft and Oracle, Cisco Systems will
>start releasing security patches for some of its products on a schedule.
>...
>The first of these scheduled updates will occur on
At 01:39 PM 2/14/2008, Mike Blodgett wrote:
> > MS 2000.
> >
> > I am just looking to see if there is a router/network hardware solution for
> > this. The do not want to map drives,
> > they want to see all shares/printers in Network Barrio. Welcome to
> > government. If there is not a network sol
At 09:56 AM 1/24/2008, you wrote:
>Thanks very much for the example Robert!
>
>Do you know if m23 framing on the T3 is a standard with channelized DS3's? I
>use a number of ATM DS3's and we use c-bit framing there.
You're welcome. Today, C-bit is typically used when you have a point
to point circ
At 01:20 AM 1/24/2008, Nick Voth wrote:
>Our platform is a 7206 VXR with the PA-MC-T3 card running the IP Plus
>feature set on a relatively new IOS. Like I said, I just need the T1's to do
>basic IP traffic.
Here you go:
controller T3 1/0
framing m23
cablelength 40
logging-events detail
t
At 07:49 PM 12/4/2007, you wrote:
>Would it be considered retarded to put 23 T1's into a multilink bundle?
Not retarded, but I think there is a max of 8 supported. I could be
wrong though. Is 23 T1s actually cheaper than a DS3? Normally we see
the DS3 make more sense around 6-10 T1s.
-Robert
At 02:42 PM 12/3/2007, you wrote:
>If I am not mistaken, Smartnet comes by with the equipment but I'm not sure
>for how long.
I believe it is 90 days.
R
Tellurian Networks - Global Hosting Solutions Since 1995
http://www.tellurian.com | 888-TELLURIAN | 973-300-9211
"Well done is better than we
At 09:32 AM 11/27/2007, you wrote:
>After I posted to the list we got the backup 5300 online. It has half
>the interfaces and modem capacity but it should suffice. We
>reprovisioned the 2 circuits that were already connected to it and had a
>tech in that area move patchcords for another pair down
At 12:23 PM 11/14/2007, Peter Olsson wrote:
>Equipment recommendations for this scenario would be very much
>appreciated:
>Two central offices with 1 Gbps Ethernet between them.
>Each central office has 100 Mbps Ethernet lines to 10-15 branch offices.
>All traffic is encrypted.
>We have been consid
Hello all,
I am trying to simplify some of our POP setups. We frequently have a
stand alone fiber transceiver rack shelf for conversion of a few
100Mbit SM fiber connections to 100Base-T. In our Foundry XMR gear,
we can install 100Mbit SM SFPs in the GigE slots. Is there any card
(current or d
. Cisco TAC claims that is a supported config.
-Robert
>Thanks,
>Adam
>
>
>- Original Message - From: "Adam Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: ; "Robert Boyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 2:10 PM
>Subject: Re: [c-ns
At 05:42 PM 10/5/2007, Adam Greene wrote:
>I've been tasked with bonding some ATM ADSL links together into a multilink
>bundle. The objective is to enable customers to double their throughput by
>obtaining (2) DSL lines from us.
>
>The head end is a 7206 (NPE200) running C7200-IS-M 12.3(15b). The C
At 03:19 AM 10/2/2007, Terje Bless wrote:
>On 10/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Cisco should make at least one 1U switch with real dual power
> > > built into the chassis or bring back a real RPS.
> >
> > Ah, but they *do* make such a switch. It's called the ME3400. Availa
A little while ago someone asked if anyone was running SXH in
production yet. There weren't any positive responses other than a few
people stating they were testing it. Has anyone taken the next step
yet? I'm interested in BGP, ISIS, BFD, SNMP, MPLS, and IPv6. We run
non-modular IOS on our Cat
At 03:21 PM 10/1/2007, you wrote:
>The RPS-600 was so much better than what's being passed off as a
>"redundant" power supply these days... I never bothered using the AC
>input on the device when it was hooked up to a RPS-600 since it had dual
>AC and you could use the dual-head RPS cable to give i
At 08:30 PM 9/30/2007, Mark Tinka wrote:
>On Monday 01 October 2007 06:32, Mario Puras wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know whether BFD is supported on ISR
> > platforms? What is the smallest platform that BFD is
> > supported on?
>
>1801
One thing to keep in mind is that Cisco only supports BFD 1.x on
I have a 7206VXR with NPE-G2 with 3 SFPs at a remote location. I am
trying to get info from the SFPs to make sure they are the correct
type. Is there a command like:
sho idprom int g2/9
which can be used on the 7200? I have tried Google and Cisco's sites
without much luck. This is what I am l
At 10:38 PM 8/13/2007, a. rahman isnaini r. sutan wrote:
>Am I right to say that MLPPP could utilize all bundled T1/E1 100% ?
>Or it might be wouldn't work normally as there some headers added on ?
>And recommended is 75% for a normal load balancing.
>
>Any suggestion would be appreciated.
The MLP
At 02:40 PM 6/20/2007, you wrote:
>That brings up a related question. Does anyone have any recommendations
>for using the overload-bit with a startup delay or BGP hold? We set it
>to 5 minutes on boot. I figure that's just enough time for the BGP to
>settle down. These 720-3BXLs are in an iBGP
At 08:45 AM 6/11/2007, you wrote:
>Can anyone suggest the right DS-3 module and cable for Cisco 7200
>and 2800 series routers.
>
>As per Cisco documentation, a PA-E3 can be used for 7200 and a
>NM-1T3/E3 for 2800 series.
1. If you are going to terminate a DS3 for a point to point
connection run
At 10:07 PM 5/16/2007, Mark Rogaski wrote:
>An entity claiming to be Juan C. Crespo R. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>: Dears
>:
>: I have one problem with one new Ds3 link, it always shows CRC errors
>: and this show controller output
>:
>:11017 Line Code Violations, 5613 P-bit Coding Violati
At 07:04 PM 4/26/2007, Matt Stevens wrote:
>Can someone give me a quick real world lesson on power supplies for the
>7600/6500's?
>
>Looking at Cisco's site it seems that most of the AC supplies will run
>on 110 or 220 volts, with the capacity being halved at 110V.
>
>I'm planning on using a 7606 w
At 02:05 PM 4/25/2007, Peder @ NetworkOblivion wrote:
>LH SFP's for $59! That is really cheap, but it makes me wonder if it is
>"too good to be true". Rather than buy some off vendor, maybe I am
>better off buying some used Cisco LH SFP's to save $$.
I have used Advantage Optics with great succe
At 11:20 AM 4/17/2007, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I was wondering how you guys monitor your BGP sessions. Do you use
>snmp traps or do you poll the router with a snmp get (if thats posible)?
>I ask this because I want don't want to get notified if one bgp goes
>down. But I would like to know if a impo
33 matches
Mail list logo
