Re: [c-nsp] BGP long prefix ads

Hello All, Thanks for comments, will digg BGP communities. 2008/1/12, Jon Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Roman Bestuzhev wrote: I am thinking about load balancing between both ISPs. I have read about a technique when you divide your block to several pieces, for example

[c-nsp] BGP long prefix ads

parts of Internet in case of filtering of long prefixes by Internet Providers? Are there other drawbacks of this? Thanks in advance for any ideas and advises, -- Roman Bestuzhev, System Administrator ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] shaping: which platform to choose and where to place

to place shaping and possibly NAT on the border router with BGP full view or there should be separated devices for each function? What are another platforms which I can use as separate shaper device? I heard about packeteer but I don't know about their products much. Thanks in advance, -- Roman

Re: [c-nsp] BGP hardware requirements

= regards, chris ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Roman Bestuzhev, System Administrator

[c-nsp] Catalyst with HSRP

help to bypass a limitation of 32 HSRP interfaces on 3560/3750. -- Roman Bestuzhev, System Administrator ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst with HSRP

VLAN's but it will only count once toward the 32 group limit. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Bedard Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 10:14 AM To: Roman Bestuzhev Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] qos on cat2950

-- Roman Bestuzhev, System Administrator ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] qos on cat2950

. -- Roman Bestuzhev, System Administrator ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] access list on 2950

from 30.30.30.128 and only passes packets from 30.30.30.16 - 31. Is this normal behavior or not? I am confused because 2950 manual says that each access list has implicit deny any statement in the end of the list. -- Roman Bestuzhev, System Administrator

[c-nsp] HWIC-4ESW and 2811 - slow speed

ethernet cables was used. Roman Bestuzhev, System Administartor ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/