If your stack image is newer, auto-upgrade should take care of it for you.
If it fails, you can run a show switch, find your master and the mismatched
switch numbers, then issue
"archive copy-sw /force-reload /overwrite /dest newswitchnumber
masterswitchnumber"
Though, since you're close enough
Hey guys,
Random headscratcher, never had to do anything like this before, so it's all
theory.
I've moved a device from 192.168.1.110 to 192.168.35.110.
When hosts inside of the .1 subnet try to access it at the "old" address, how
do I force them to go to the new address ... NAT on it's own d
Mea culpa.
That did the trick.
Other stacks can handle (and upgrade/downgrade each other) minor revision
differences and stay running.
Because the X Series uses the E Series images, they can't upgrade/downgrade the
Standard/G Series or vice versa.
Takes a little bit of the Wise out of the Sta
show switch detail :
Switch# Role Mac Address Priority Version State
--
1 Member 588d.0967.1400 1 2 Version Mismatch
2 Member 588d.099f.2500 1 2 Version Mismatch
3 Member 001d.45e3.d
The product listing on this page (
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/prod_models_comparison.html
) shows WS-C3750G-12S as being StackWise+ compatible. This is an older product
and even the literature on the other 3750v2s just references the original
StackWise technology.
If you really want to do it on the cheap.
You could see what the trade value might be worth with a grey market vendor for
a 501 w/ unlimited.
Or, you could just get a 506E w/ unlimited for around 200 in the open market ...
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Yep ... w/ crypto :
WS-C5500 Software, Version McpSW: 6.4(13) NmpSW: 6.4(13)
Copyright (c) 1995-2004 by Cisco Systems
NMP S/W compiled on Sep 13 2004, 19:20:01
MCP S/W compiled on Sep 13 2004, 19:19:28
...
Uptime is 1164 days, 20 hours, 24 minutes
(cat5000-sup3k9.6-4-13.bin)
>>> Gert Doeri
After a rocky start w/ false positives, we've had a decent go of things with
MXLogic.
They're consistently improving value to the service by adding functionality.
>>> Felix Nkansah 6/30/2009 5:56 PM >>>
Hi Team,
I am interested in subscribing to a GOOD online email filtering service,
through whi
er than nothing and mostly, the sounding
board helps.
Regards,
Sean
>>> "Sean Granger" 6/23/2009 2:13 PM >>>
I have a customer passing traffic to me through a network we have no control
over.
They don't allow private addressing, yet have only assigned a /29 for tran
I have a customer passing traffic to me through a network we have no control
over.
They don't allow private addressing, yet have only assigned a /29 for transit
traffic.
Due to these addressing requirements, he is translating his internally private
source addresses by overloading the address of
Running 7.2.4~, we're trying to fail from one interface which has a direct
connection to the customer, to a VPN connection over the Internet ... which is
the outbound interface. The assumption here was that in using tracking and a
higher metric route to the tunnel's end point / gateway ... the P
I'll take a dozen at the market price.
>>> Mark Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/20/08 11:32AM >>>
>> When I bought several dozen Cisco SFPs a few years back each SFP
was
>> in a static bag. The static bag was in a large Ziploc of sorts
[snip]
>> I [snip] started slicing the plastic bags open with my
Solarwinds packages this up, nice and pretty, with it's "Switch Port Mapper".
You don't want to know how much that costs ...
But if you already own the Engineer's toolset, go for it.
>>> "Arie Vayner (avayner)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/09/08 01:34PM >>>
The way to do it is to check the MAC address l
Seconded.
In fact, it's a common sense thing that since it's not being done, is brilliant.
>>> Justin Shore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/24/08 01:43PM >>>
Seth Mattinen wrote:
> It's been slow for me since this current iteration of the design came
> out. I just attributed it to the tradeoff between fla
Wanted to bounce this around the list, to see what people are using?
Anything providing a Java/AJAX applet from it's own webserver for real-time
updates, for anywhere monitoring, rather than having to install 3rd party
software??
Email, SMS (via adapter and/or gateway), SNMP ... standard issue.
This is starting to look like the most egalitarian thread in sometime.
Calm down guys, sharing and laughing over common hardships might let
"the others" know we weren't simply always experts in all areas.
Reading a book will only get you so far, right? ;)
>>> Jeff Kell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/10/08
If the price is the same, I don't see the cause for further debate. Why would
you not purchase the newer, yet still compatible gear, for future better
performance and longer support life?
>>> Mark Tinka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/22/08 08:33 AM >>>
On Thursday 21 February 2008, Dirk-Jan van Helmond
SMB doesn't need NetBIOS over TCP/IP anymore, i.e.
http://support.microsoft..com/kb/204279
This should give you anything else you might need in regards to MS-related
Networking, http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832017
As long as your DNS is well aware of these hosts (sounds like a pain to manage
I use the open source app, vpnc, in linux.
Don't see why you couldn't just rebuild it in windows ... certainly in cygwin.
This should get you started ... http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/
No need to run all that overhead of a VPC/VMWare JUST for your VPN connection.
>>> "Jonathan Charles
Absolutely agreed.
Order what you need.
If you need help down the line, it's not going to cost any more.
If you fear that, get the number in advance then hold them to it later.
If you're buying this level of gear anyway, you'd be hard pressed to not get
what you mostly want.
>>> Jared Mauch <[EMA
20 matches
Mail list logo
