[c-nsp] MPLS TE load-balancing

the relative metric to -1, traffic flows only over the TE tunnel. Auto-route announce is configured. Thanks, Stephen Kratzer ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720 IDB Limit

. --- On Wed, 13/5/09, Stephen Kratzer kratz...@pa.net wrote: From: Stephen Kratzer kratz...@pa.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SUP720 IDB Limit To: Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, kratz...@ctinetworks.com Date: Wednesday, 13 May, 2009, 11:31 PM VPDN is available with the SP feature

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720 IDB Limit

command. Am I missing something ? regards, Tony. --- On Fri, 8/5/09, Stephen Kratzer kratz...@ctinetworks.com wrote: From: Stephen Kratzer kratz...@ctinetworks.com Subject: [c-nsp] SUP720 IDB Limit To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Friday, 8 May, 2009, 10:46 PM All, We're looking

[c-nsp] SUP720 IDB Limit

All, We're looking to step up from the 7200 series to the 7600 series for DSL aggregation. Anyone know what the IDB limit is for this platform (#show idb)? We're at about 15000. Thanks. Stephen Kratzer Network Engineer CTI Networks, Inc. ___ cisco

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720 IDB Limit

numbers, but to the scale of the HW modules - as sessions are terminated on distributed hardware resources. Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Stephen Kratzer Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 15:47 To: cisco

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720 IDB Limit

On Friday 08 May 2009 14:17:58 Adam Armstrong wrote: Stephen Kratzer wrote: All, We're looking to step up from the 7200 series to the 7600 series for DSL aggregation. Anyone know what the IDB limit is for this platform (#show idb)? We're at about 15000. Thanks. Isn't the 7600

Re: [c-nsp] Sprint ATT BGP multihoming

the Embarq connection all but useless as far as diverse, load-balanced routing is concerned. Stephen Kratzer Network Engineer CTI Networks, Inc. On Wednesday 11 February 2009 08:58:30 Adam Greene wrote: Had a good experience multihoming to ATT, including fixing an issue with balancing traffic

Re: [c-nsp] Multihomed BGP load balancing

also, you could try using communities to either increase local pref on provider A's network or decrease local pref on provider B's network. And, when none of those options work as desired, you'll probably go back to deaggregating... Stephen Kratzer Network Engineer CTI Networks, Inc

[c-nsp] multipoint VPN options

the VPN Thanks, Stephen Kratzer Network Engineer CTI Networks, Inc. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Distribute List

Probably a mucked up distribute/filter/prefix list. Check 'show ip prefix-list detail' and 'show ip access-list'. It's also possible that the peers don't support route refresh. Can check this with 'show ip bgp neighbor'. On Monday 17 November 2008 10:47:31 Mike Louis wrote: I have a distribute

Re: [c-nsp] can I know what is this command issue and want to learn about cisco best practice

On Friday 17 October 2008 13:28:35 kcc wrote: Hi all I am new in cisco 1/ Can I know what is this command issue? cisco6513(config)#username peter privilege 15 password 7 peterpassword Invalid encrypted password: peterpassword This command is invalid because the string

Re: [c-nsp] Conditional BGP

list templates and apply them outbound as needed. Stephen Kratzer Network Engineer CTI Networks, Inc. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Conditional BGP

Forgot to mention that they'll still need to set local pref to always prefer the primary provider. Stephen Kratzer Network Engineer CTI Networks, Inc. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Conditional BGP

but not zero due to our peering etc). Thanks very much, Paul -Original Message- From: Stephen Kratzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 23, 2008 9:00 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Paul Stewart Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Conditional BGP On Tuesday 23 September 2008 08:37:56 Paul

Re: [c-nsp] PPPOE Static IP

-Netmask := x.x.x.x or Cisco-AVPair += ip:addr=x.x.x.x. Stephen Kratzer Network Engineer CTI Networks, Inc. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail

Re: [c-nsp] can't ping from router

On Friday 05 September 2008 12:36:33 Paul A wrote: Hi, I have a 7200 terminating some pppoe customers using BBA-GROUP. Everything is working and has been working without any issues. However digging around I came across a weird problem. It seems that from the 7200 terminating router I can't

Re: [c-nsp] NPE G1, CEF and ACLs and high CPU

from a certain source, you might want to just bit-bucket it rather than sending ICMP responses. Stephen Kratzer Network Engineer CTI Networks, Inc. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] NPE G1, CEF and ACLs and high CPU

On Thursday 04 September 2008 15:12:12 Mateusz Błaszczyk wrote: 2008/9/4 Stephen Kratzer : The 'log' keyword will cause matching packets to not be CEF switched. nope, log is not present. Also, if you're denying a lot of traffic from a certain source, you might want to just bit-bucket

[c-nsp] PA-POS-OC3SMI vs. PA-POS-OC3SML

. Stephen Kratzer Network Engineer CTI Networks, Inc. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF point-to-point vs dr/bdr

] The benefit/cost ratio is low. You aren't saving much be eliminating DR/BDR election, and it's just one more unnecessary tweak to keep track of. IMHO. Stephen Kratzer Network Engineer CTI Networks, Inc. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] BGP connection and default route

to have a route (static, connected, or IGP) between them. It's important that the BGP session is established across the intended interface. IOS enforces this by not allowing locally-generated BGP messages to follow a default route (or something to that effect). Stephen Kratzer Network Engineer

Re: [c-nsp] SMTP Redirection

On Thursday 16 August 2007 08:12:37 a. rahman isnaini r. sutan wrote: Hi, How can i enable smtp redirection on a cisco router ? In other word, if any user send email to any destination their smtp setting will not be changed. And the packet then redirected to a smtp server. This smtp

Re: [c-nsp] PPPOE DNS Question

On Wednesday 15 August 2007 09:19:08 Paul Stewart wrote: Hi folks... This may seem like a silly question but I can't find a doc to confirm this We have 7206VXR's for LAC/LNS termination (PPPOE). When a client connects and successfully authenticates against our Radius servers, where