Re: [c-nsp] CSR1000V and CPU usage

> > Mostly folks were using these for Route reflectors I think. > > That's what we do. Works like a charm, over 12x months now. In this application how low bandwidth license can you get away with in practice? Do the bandwidth license limits apply to both routed traffic and control-plane traffic (

Re: [c-nsp] Can Cisco be used for LAC features?

> > I think the LAC will always send those two requests and will take what it > likes better; in this case, a good old non-L2TP PPPoE. > > Don't use the same radius server for LAC and LNS, or at least, make sure > testu...@example.net authenticates only when the NAS is the LNS, but not > when the L

Re: [c-nsp] Policing IPv6 on LNS

Now I appreciate that's a good incentive for customers to migrate to IPv6 but I'd rather have the control :-) -- Steve Glendinning ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 7206VXR with NPE-G2 / 12.4(4)XD4

> > I have two 7204VXR with NPE-G2 running 15.2(4) S3 for some time. It's > doing BGP, but no OSPF, but it's been very stable. > 15.1(3)S3 is also very stable for us on both NPE-G1 and NPE-G2. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https:/

Re: [c-nsp] Radius Gigawords support for Cisco7200

For a reference point, gigawords work well on 7200 15.1(3)S4. Also this release is good for RFC4818 Delegated-IPv6-Prefix RADIUS attribute. This tidied up our RADIUS database no end. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.net

[c-nsp] 6PE FIB usage on 6500/7600

Hi all, I've enabled 6PE on some of our rsp720-3cxl's (running SRE8) that carry full global routes, and it appears to have allocated a separate MPLS label for each IPv6 prefix in BGP (approx 16,000 of them). Consequently this is chewing up significantly more FIB space, as each (global) IPv6 prefi

[c-nsp] Policing IPv6 on LNS

+= "lcp:interface-config=service-policy output POLICE-10Mbit" But alas, policing only applies to the ipv4 traffic. Ideally I'd like the policer to apply to everything on the interface, such that both IPv4 and IPv6 are policed. Any ideas if this is possible? Thanks! -- Steve Gl

[c-nsp] Cisco 7600/6500 IPv6 netflow export with source/destination ASNs

7600 platform for IPv6 netflow? Thanks in advance, -- Steve Glendinning Net That Works ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7200 LNS Multilink per-user RADIUS attributes

Hi all, I'm resurrecting this old thread to record my progress for the archives. Hopefully this will spare someone else a day of head scratching. It turns out that the following RADIUS attribute prevents multilink from establishing a bundle: Cisco-AVPair += "ipv6:prefix#1=2A02::

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7200 LNS Multilink per-user RADIUS attributes

configure 5 ppp max-bad-auth 3 ppp authentication chap pap callin ppp multilink ppp timeout retry 15 ppp timeout authentication 15 -- Steve Glendinning ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-n

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7200 LNS Multilink per-user RADIUS attributes

LNS, and all the attributes are coming through as expected so I don't think this is the problem. -- Steve Glendinning ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] Cisco 7200 LNS Multilink per-user RADIUS attributes

no joy: Cisco-Avpair = "multilink:max-links=2" Cisco-Avpair = "multilink:min-links=1" Cisco-Avpair = "multilink:load-threshold=10" Cisco-Avpair = "preauth:ppp-multilink=1" Thanks, -- Steve Glendinning ___ cisco