Re: [c-nsp] Nexus Architecture question

2021-06-11 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- I don't know that we can/should draw that conclusion - as you mentioned, you opened a TAC case but from my understanding it was never driven to a terminal resolution - either "known limitation, live with it" or "bug, we will/won't fix it" or "you're doing it wrong". I

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus Architecture question

2021-06-04 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Hi Drew, Can you specify hardware platform and software version here? I am not seeing what you're seeing, the config I sent blocks a BGP port scan in nmap, and prevents BGP peering to anything other than the specified IP. I am testing on Nexus 9500 with 10.1 NXOS; I

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus Architecture question

2021-06-02 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Hi Drew, In answer to your question about BGP, the BGP process runs only on the supervisor engine, it does not run on the linecards or anywhere else. It's a single process, not a per-interface process or anything like that. Curious how exactly you are configuring CoPP to

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

2021-04-27 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
w] size = 256 On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 2:08 PM Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp wrote: > > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: "Tim Stevenson (tstevens)" > To: Lasse Birnbaum Jensen , "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" > > Cc: >

Re: [c-nsp] NXOS 7 apply VTY access-list to both IPv4 and IPv6

2021-01-13 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Should be like this: tstevens-9236c-1(config)# line vty tstevens-9236c-1(config-line)# ip ip ipv6 tstevens-9236c-1(config-line)# ip access-class foo in tstevens-9236c-1(config-line)# ipv6 access-class bar in tstevens-9236c-1(config-line)# sh run | sec vty line vty

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

2019-05-13 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- First gen n9k does not support Netflow at all, only sflow. 2nd gen (EX/FX/FX2) support both, but there is the SPAN+SFlow limitation (we are working on fixing that for FX2, which can theoretically support these concurrently). For recommended sampling value, we set the rate

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus Data Broker

2019-05-10 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Release notes have this information. EX & FX are both supported. 3600-R is not. See Table 2/Table 3 here: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/net_mgmt/xnc/nexus_data_broker/release_notes/Nexus_Data_Broker_Release_Notes_371.html Hope that helps, Tim -Original

Re: [c-nsp] TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396

2019-03-20 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Please check the config guide. I am not as familiar w/the 1st gen switches as 2nd gen, but there should be at least some level of reconfigurability of the regions in gen 1. So you may be able to size up the region you want by removing entries from some other region. Yes,

Re: [c-nsp] TCAM utilization on Nexus 9396

2019-03-20 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Yes, ACL lines consume space in the TCAM. TCAM can be recarved according to the features in use/required. As long as the policy fits in the available TCAM space for that feature (software will complain and fail your config if it won't), enforcement is at full rate, no

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

2019-03-20 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- -Original Message- From: Satish Patel Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 10:23 AM To: Tim Stevenson (tstevens) Cc: Nick Cutting ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance Thanks Tim, Here is the output of show hardware

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

2019-03-20 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Yes, this is 1st gen. The SFLOW/SPAN restriction should not apply there. Re: 60Gbps/24Mpps and SFLOW, SFLOW does not do aggregation of stats for flows in the switch like netflow does - it's just 1-in-n packet sampling. As such, the value of "n" should be high enough that

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

2019-03-20 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Make sure you distinguish between N9300 (1st generation) and N9300-EX/FX/FX2 (2nd generation). The SFLOW + SPAN limitation applies only to the latter. It's also on the latter that Netflow is supported, which can run concurrently with SPAN sessions. Tim -Original

Re: [c-nsp] Qos Statistics on the 7K

2018-12-04 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Hi Brad, I checked this on n7700 F3 - concur that even w/'statistics per-entry', the hit count is not incrementing in 'sh ip access' output when the ACL is used for QOS classification. Same behavior in 8.3.1. >From what I see, the statistics are in fact incrementing in

Re: [c-nsp] Fixed switch based on N9K-X9636C-RX

2018-08-08 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- There isn't one. Closest is Nexus 3636C-R, this is J+ based like the 9636C-RX but with on-chip tables only (no external TCAM). Tim -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Drew Weaver Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 5:39 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] N9K ASIC port grouping

2018-06-26 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
16 Eth1/351a004400 10102 255 136 -13 1224 Eth1/361a004600 10106 255 140 -13 1632 BR, Pedro Caetano On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp < cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>

Re: [c-nsp] N9K ASIC port grouping

2018-06-25 Thread Tim Stevenson (tstevens) via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- Not aware of a single document that will show that for all platforms. Best way is "show interface hardware-mappings". "Unit" and "Slice" are the main points of reference (unit == ASIC instance, slice == pipeline). E.g., 93180yc-ex: leaf1# sh int hard Legends: SMod