> Have you tested what happens with an XR BGP when a valid peer sends you
> ~2,147,483,647 prefixes please?
>
> My guess is the BGP runs out of memory and restarts -what happens to the
> FIB on all line-cards I'm not even guessing...
> And then the RRs pushing 2bilions of prefixes to all other
eXR makes this so much easier.
Other than the pain of 6.3.2 -> 6.3.3 (where RPM moved to code signing) pretty
much none of that is necessary.
But yeah, 3* lines should get you from any version > 6.3.3 to any other
version. ([conf t, fpd auto-upgrade enable, commit, end,] copy url:///file
> Extreme (ex-Brocade) CER-RT
I'd heard Extreme were looking to EOL/EOS that box.
It's too slow for 2019 anyway and has some pretty critical bugs that I don't
think can be fixed.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Mr. Ytti successfully predicted that they'd "probably" only make 32-bit
> up to around version 6.5, so that sounds like it's right on the money.
When I saw a version 6 XR image for an ASR9001 I was shocked.
I had been told quite a while ago that 5.3.4 was it and no to expect anything
newer.
> For us, customer-triggered RTBH is provided as standard for all eBGP sessions
> with customers. Once they send us the right community with their own
> routes, we just pass that community on to the RR's via iBGP. The RR will relay
> those routes to all other devices in the network, and as long as
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Robert Raszuk
> So for educational purposes could you describe some real valid use cases to
> apply bgp policies on routes *received* over IBGP ?
>
> Thx,
> Robert.
Setting local preference?
> XRv is simple control-plane of XR in a VM. This is why L2 forwarding isnt
> supported (though is configured).
> XRv9000 is full control- and data-plane and much tighter coupling of the two.
> L2 forwarding should work, but L2VPNs and such will fail miserably.
>
> q.
XRv9000 6.4.1 works fine -
I'd start here:
Apr 2 07:57:46.146: RADIUS: AAA Unsupported Attr: interface [175] 15
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Olivier
CALVANO
Sent: Sunday, 2 April 2017 5:59 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp]
Hi All,
Has anyone had an opportunity to play with the IOS-XRv 9K version 6.0.0 image?
Are you seeing high CPU usage (even with all ports shut down?)
Just trying to ascertain why its burning through 2 cores for what seems to be
no real good reason.
Thanks
Tim.
FTFY - w/QOS(Shaping) - 60Gb(Without any additional licenses)
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
CiscoNSP List
Sent: Saturday, 14 March 2015 3:55 PM
To: Jeremy Bresley; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10Gb+ Core
Watch your rommon version too.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Jordi Magrané Roig
Sent: Monday, 15 December 2014 11:34 PM
To: mark.ti...@seacom.mu; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1006 Memory issue
Have an oldish 7200-G2 in the lab that I need to setup with test peering
with an AS larger than 65535 - It does not accept asdot notation (i.e.
throws an error when I enter the converted AS - It doesnt like the .).
AS65535 = Peer with AS23456
This is its purpose.
Otherwise on your 7200
Afternoon,
Is there an IOS that supports ipv6 route track?
Thanks
-Tim
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
I have a Cisco 3825 with 1GB Ram doing some BGP peering (VERY low
traffic, not even 5mbit/s sustained throughput). Memory usage is
absolutely fine and sitting at less than 50% utilization, and stable.
The Router's CPU is showing an almost linear increases, and the 'TCP
Timer' process is
I used cisco output interpreter and got the following explanation below.
But I dont have any memory/cpu problem on the router.
Router has no load actually. No subscribers connected yet and is designed
to
handle l2tp clients only.
What is the output of:
show processes memory | i Free
-Original Message-
From: ar [mailto:ar_...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2012 10:26 PM
To: Tim Warnock; 'cisco-nsp'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] LNS Error %VPDN-3-NORESOURCE:
#sho processes memory | i Free
Processor Pool Total: 1872053612 Used: 58648856 Free: 1813404756
I/O
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ambedkar
Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012 2:37 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Fibre link flapping
Thanks for the suggestions...
I checked
Hi List,
Would someone know how (if it's possible) to adjust the volume/gain on a
voice BRI in ccme?
Thanks,
Tim.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hemal Shah
Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2011 7:12 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] 2811 password recovery
Hi ,
I am trying to recover password for
Hi All,
A while ago there was a discussion of L2TPv3 passwords being recalculated
after a 'show run'.
Was there ever a fix for it?
Thanks
Tim.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
I could use loopback interfaces instead but I ll get /32 mask advertised over
ospf ... and I want to advertise a network mask
like /24. Or an other solution may be to resdtribute static null route with
/24 prefix from this routeur ...
A loopback interface is an interface - if you want to
21 matches
Mail list logo
