Re: [c-nsp] Cogent IOS upgrade == BGP-3, "update malformed"

Cogent probably hit CSCsy27511 I saw such thing when router affected by that bug sent malformed update to router that do not support 4 byte ASn. On 23.08.2010 2:49, randal k wrote: Cogent did an IOS upgrade to our local router, and immediately after our peering with them started flapping wil

Re: [c-nsp] smaller PI

Thats either a cruel joke or jeer Jan Gregor wrote: Hi guys, one of our customers requested PI adresses from RIPE (for whatever reason) and got back /26. Opinions? Best regards, Jan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puc

Re: [c-nsp] Continous BGP session resets on SRD3

ney Dunn wrote: That's not it. Shimol is formulating an update on the issue and correct bug id. Stand by... On 6/18/10 8:41 AM, Tima Maryin wrote: I've been told by TAC that this problem caused by CSCta33973 ___ cisco-nsp maili

Re: [c-nsp] Continous BGP session resets on SRD3

I've been told by TAC that this problem caused by CSCta33973 Rodney Dunn wrote: We are working to get some clarification on this. In the interim... Can anyone prove they saw this when either: a) The upstream speaker did not have the AS Path limit configured to something lower (say less than

Re: [c-nsp] Continous BGP session resets on SRD3

Rodney Dunn wrote: We are working to get some clarification on this. In the interim... Can anyone prove they saw this when either: a) The upstream speaker did not have the AS Path limit configured to something lower (say less than 200)? b) The upstream speaker was running with code *newer* t

Re: [c-nsp] Continous BGP session resets on SRD3

It happens when you peer with GSR with _particular_(my personal assumption) version and your IOS do not support 4byte AS. The problem was caused by malicious update from one AS which disappeared from internet table yesterday after 4 or 5 hours. Gordon Bezzina wrote: Hi, The other end is a

Re: [c-nsp] BGP ipv6 peers with ipv4 router-ids

Christian MacNevin wrote: Hi Is it generally done to exchange ipv6 info with bgp peers defined only by ipv4 router ids? Ie: Router bgp 65001 Neighbor 1.2.3.4 remote-as 65001 ! Address-family ipv6 Neighbor 1.2.3.4 activate ... or to carry v6 info over v4 network ? ___

Re: [c-nsp] mpls + ipv4 route

I don't see why it's not supported if there is a document about it... Also some people says that when you enable this feature it cause recirculation on pfc for each packet. I would be happy to hear if its correct or not. Tim Durack wrote: Do you have Inet in a vrf? We ran into something lik

Re: [c-nsp] 10G Ethernet Module

Just wanted to add - negative points: you lose TE support on etherchannel when you switch from SXF to SXH/SHI :) Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:48:40PM -0500, Tony Varriale wrote: From: "Gert Doering" (Regarding your question, I can't say. We decided to go for 6500

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6: Getting started

I think it will depend on your v4<->v6 translation rules. Peter Rathlev wrote: On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 14:38 +0300, Tima Maryin wrote: Why don't keep it ipv4? If you run MPLS VPN netowork i don't see why you want something else in core. MPLS don't care about ipv4/6 and PE j

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6: Getting started

Hello! Peter Rathlev wrote: Q: We run an MPLS VPN network, global routing only used for management. According to this document (which should also cover 12.2SX): http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-ov_mpls_6vpe.html#wp1054029 6VPE supports an MPLS IPv4-signaled co

Re: [c-nsp] 32 bit ASN

Hello! Is there any update on this ? Rodney Dunn wrote: I'm asking about this. I'll get back with you. It's going to be in a 12.0(33)S rebuild for sure. But I need to check back on what the 12008 decision was...ie: only in 32S rebuilds? On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:24:56PM -0700, Troy Beis

Re: [c-nsp] Internet vrf, pros and cons

Hi! Pros: Security. You can make device management based on private addresses like 10./172. So no one ever can get remote access to your routers from internet. Cons: Memory consuption on routers. Each full view will consume more router's ram that usual. A bit more annoying troubleshoot - you ne

Re: [c-nsp] Any 3xxx Switches support MPLS?

But keep in mind that it has oversubscription on non uplink ports Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote: > 2) Buy ME6524, which is a very good box ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7206VXR - IOS 12.4(12) - Bus Error Crash

Most likely problem can be solved if you switch to 12.4(latest). Werner Detter wrote: > Hi again, > >> crashed due to a bus error (bus error at PC 0x6013C4D8, address 0x64588700). skip > What do you suggest? > > Any help or comments appreciated, > Werner _

Re: [c-nsp] Weird error

What IOS version do you use? One corrected ECC error is ok. If it continue to repeat you need to change DRAM module Ziv Leyes wrote: > I just find it funny that there's nobody that can tell something about it... ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] [ME6524] port based EoMPLS

Hello! Is there 12.2(18)SXF ios that will boot on 6524 ? CCO offers only ZU2 and SXH Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: > Mateusz Blaszczyk <> wrote on Monday, February 25, 2008 2:00 PM: > >> List, >> >> I would like to report a problem with ME6524s that I have in the >> testlab network at the m