Re: [c-nsp] Bridging ethernet to MLPPP

I've got this working good over multiple bridged MLPPP connections. There was a thread on this previously when I had some issues with it. You basically need to use a BVI interface with the bridge to get things to work properly. Sample config that helped me get this working is below. R1/R2:

[c-nsp] DS3 card serial bounces

these serial interfaces to an OC12 on the 454. Still see the same results on the 7513. Has anyone experienced this or have any tips on debugging this situation? Thanks in advance, Todd ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] Bridging Serial Interfaces

Worked like a charm. Thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: Antonio Soares [mailto:amsoa...@netcabo.pt] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 7:50 PM To: Todd Shipway; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Bridging Serial Interfaces R1/R2: Bridge irb Bridge 1 protocol ieee

[c-nsp] Bridging Serial Interfaces

and router2 are using the default route below: Ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial 0 The issue is that no traffic will pass over the bridge. Router1 is unable to ping router2 and vice versa. Any ideas as to what I'm missing with this? Thanks, Todd

Re: [c-nsp] Bridging Serial Interfaces

Routing is enabled on that router and I do have bridge irb enabled just to be safe. On Nov 12, 2010, at 6:07 PM, John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Todd Shipway t...@newfrontierssolutions.com wrote: The issue is that no traffic will pass over

Re: [c-nsp] Sup7203BXL in 7600 versus 6509

to stay on the same 12.2SX versions on both our 6500's and 7600's that both use sup7203bxl's. Todd From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Rick Kunkel Sent: Thu 5/6/2010 11:42 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Sup7203BXL

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco AIRONET WPA-Enterprise w/Windows question..

radius is an open source radius server software that supports multiple EAP methods and can also hand off authentication to Windows Active Directory. I hope this information is helpful. Todd Linder -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun

[c-nsp] Split T1's on Channelized DS3 card

I've got a few customers on T1's that are split for data and voice. These T's are currently coming in on a standard T1 serial card in a 7513 chassis. I'm trying to move them to a channelized DS3 card. I've got the channel groups split and setup as needed but the T1 never comes up. Anyone know

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst vs. Nexus

A few other thoughts on the Nexus difference from a 6500 based on my experience since I am still learning the 7K platform: 1) MPLS the 7K is VRF Light syle 2) Application of an access-list by doing a tftp-run (with out removing the acl which is applied to the interface) is extremely taxing in

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst vs. Nexus

To: Todd, Douglas M. Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst vs. Nexus On 09/09/2009 11:43, Todd, Douglas M. wrote: 1) MPLS the 7K is VRF Light syle it's EARL8, so it's mpls capable at a hardware level. 3) Nexus STP is RSTP not pvst+ The N5K supports pvst+: http

Re: [c-nsp] 7513 multilink interface issue

No output from the command. summit#sh contr cbus | incl 1/0:14|1/0:15 summit# I also upgrade to 12.4(25) last night and no change in the issue. The same issue still remains. -Original Message- From: Rodney Dunn [mailto:rod...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:47 AM To: Todd

[c-nsp] 7513 multilink interface issue

We have several customers setup with T1's multilinked. We are running into a problem with a single multilink member bouncing causing routing issues. When a single T1 member of a multilink group bounces, traffic to the overall multilink interface stops and we have to manually shut and no shut the

Re: [c-nsp] 7513 multilink interface issue

, but END USER can't ping 7513 and no connection to/from SERVER to END USER. Hope that makes sense. -Original Message- From: Rodney Dunn [mailto:rod...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:24 PM To: Todd Shipway Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7513 multilink

Re: [c-nsp] 7513 multilink interface issue

/16:0, since 00:02:15 -Original Message- From: Rodney Dunn [mailto:rod...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:43 PM To: Todd Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7513 multilink interface issue It does. I've seen it before years ago. get 'sh ppp multilink' from

[c-nsp] Can't ping outside network over T1

I've got a weird issue that I can't seem to solve. Overview. Network is running on a core router which is a 7513 with channelized DS3's split into ds1's to customers. I have one customer who has 2 T1's bonded using multilink ppp. I can ping everything on our network, including other customers.

Re: [c-nsp] Can't ping outside network over T1

Nope. No filtering at all on the entire path for this customer. On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:28 PM, rgolod...@infratection.com wrote: Todd, any egress filtering to the customer in place that is different from your other configs? Richard --Original Message-- From: Todd Shipway Sender

Re: [c-nsp] Virtual Access int down after IOS upgrade

For archiving purposes... The issue with the ATM interfaces was due to an older ATM card that wasn't compatible with 12.4(23). Once the card was replaced with a newer enhanced ATM card, all PVC interfaces came online without a problem. -Todd On Mar 14, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Todd Shipway t

Re: [c-nsp] Virtual Access int down after IOS upgrade

dsl16 ! ip local pool dsl13 63.168.160.164 ip local pool dsl14 63.168.160.165 ip local pool dsl15 63.168.160.166 ip local pool dsl16 198.70.13.130 198.70.13.142 On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 19:38 -0400, Todd Shipway wrote: We just upgraded a 7500 to 12.4(23) and everything works great except DSL

[c-nsp] Virtual Access int down after IOS upgrade

We just upgraded a 7500 to 12.4(23) and everything works great except DSL connections over atm card. ATM interfaces are up, all configuration is in place, pvc interfaces are up, virtual templates are in place. But the virtual-access interface refuses to come up. Anyone have any clues as to what

[c-nsp] 7500 Channelized DS3 Issues

on any cards. Cards aren't over provisioned, and I can't pinpoint why this issue is occurring. It seems like it's slowly spreading from interface to interface. Has anyone experienced something similar or have any clues as to what I could possibly look for? Thanks, Todd signature.asc Description

[c-nsp] Small routing issue

issue? Any help would be appreciated. -Todd signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Small routing issue

198.70.33.176/29 to them. Is there NAT'ing going on, or did I miss something? Ken Matlock Network Analyst Exempla Healthcare (303) 467-4671 matlo...@exempla.org -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Todd Shipway Sent: Monday

[c-nsp] Unexplainable Output drops on serial interfaces

as a test as well as the output queue raised from 40 to 100 with no change in drops. -Todd signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] Unexplainable Output drops on serial interfaces

The multilink interface had qos setup but not on the individual serial interfaces. However I am seeing these drops on interfaces with no qos or shaping on them as well. On Feb 19, 2009, at 3:03 PM, David Freedman david.freed...@uk.clara.net wrote: Todd, do you have any kind of shaping

Re: [c-nsp] Unexplainable Output drops on serial interfaces

drops. I'll check CPU usage once again when I get back to the office. On Feb 19, 2009, at 3:15 PM, David Freedman david.freed...@uk.clara.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What about the VIP CPU load on these VIPs? do you graph it? Todd Shipway wrote: The multilink

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 snmp and vty acls ?

Just some thoughts: I believe the the acls are hardware based in with the pfc3 (I don't believe that the software version makes this difference), but I do believe they are hardware based unless you add things like logging. This may help you with the pfc3

Re: [c-nsp] Calculate wildcard..

This might help in addition to what Bill sent: http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2007/12/26/q-how-do-i-compute-complex-wildcar d-masks-for-access-lists/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bill fumerola Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 2:39 AM

Re: [c-nsp] CBWFQ/PQ Support on 6500/SUP720-3BXL

Zahid: We were looking at the same senerio and found that we must use a SIP type card to do any traffic shaping. The 6500 does not have this type of feature. SIP-200/400 for either DS1/100FD/1G type of connections. Hope this helps. Douglas -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [c-nsp] Interruptions when enabling mls qos

The only problem I have seen is with COPP enabled. Enabling the qos feature on the 6500 enables the hardware policing function of COPP (otherwise it's just software policing COPP). This causes traffic to hit the default queue more (still truly unsure why this is). -Original