Re: [c-nsp] Problems with A99-8X100GE-TR and IOS XR 6.5.3

2023-06-05 Thread Tom Hill via cisco-nsp
On 2023-06-01 21:38, Bryan Holloway via cisco-nsp wrote: https://community.cisco.com/t5/xr-os-and-platforms/problems-with-a99-8x100ge-tr-and-ios-xr-6-5-3/td-p/4013668 This chassis has been up and churning packets for several years, so it was presumed to be a possible hardware fail. We acquired

Re: [c-nsp] Hiding SCP Password Using Archive Feature

2023-05-03 Thread Tom Hill via cisco-nsp
On 2023-04-29 14:47, Richard Clayton via cisco-nsp wrote: Hi Guys s/Guys/everyone/g archive path scp:// user:password@1.2.3.4/CUSTOMERS/CUSTOMER1/CUSTOMER-LONDON6-ETH1.cfg write-memory time-period 10080 Because the password part of the SCP config is not an IOS recognised password I don't

Re: [c-nsp] 32 x 100G box

2023-01-24 Thread Tom Hill via cisco-nsp
On 2023-01-24 14:13, Marcin via cisco-nsp wrote: Hi, Do Cisco have a 32 x 10G (at least more than 16 x 100G) box with a similar scale to ACX87100-32C / Ufispace S9600-32X (basically J2 / J2C chipsets)? It needs to have deeper buffers, >500K MACs + MPLS feature set. I thought that I'd find

Re: [c-nsp] Best Practices for Transporting Layer-2 Services

2023-01-13 Thread Tom Hill via cisco-nsp
On 2023-01-12 16:45, Shawn L via cisco-nsp wrote: I'm wondering what other providers are doing when they need to transport a bunch of third-party layer-2 services? For Example -- if another SP wants to hand you 3 vlans (for example 10,11,12) and have you transport them to a couple of sites.

Re: [c-nsp] DNA -- How do I justify the expense to mgmt when we'll never use it?

2023-01-06 Thread Tom Hill via cisco-nsp
On 06/01/2023 14:15, Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp wrote: Also is there any way to figure out what this stuff should cost? It's some variant of Broadcom Trident chipset, right? Trident3-X5? Though remember that the value of hardware packaging around the ASIC is extremely variable. Poor cooling

Re: [c-nsp] storm-control errdisable with no traffic or vlan

2022-08-08 Thread Tom Hill via cisco-nsp
On 2022-08-06 06:15, Saku Ytti via cisco-nsp wrote: On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 at 05:27, Paul via cisco-nsp wrote: Storm control pps is bugged on the 10g ports on the older 4900 platforms, 4948E , 4900M, sup6 platforms. My guess would be that PPS is not supported by the hardware and behaviour is

Re: [c-nsp] A9K-ISM-100 with A9K-RSP440-SE ??

2018-11-14 Thread Tom Hill via cisco-nsp
--- Begin Message --- On 14/11/2018 20:42, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: > I got the following when inserted ISM module into ASR9k the other day, would > you know what is it complaining about? > This line card does not use NPs, and is neither Trident-based nor > Typhoon-based so should not