The platforms where GLC-T are supporting 10/100/1000Base-T are listed here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_6981.html
Don't know however if they do support auto-neg or not.
Y.
2011/10/19 Brett Looney br...@looney.id.au
They do
Hi Terry,
If you haven't done an no ip redirects on all your routed interfaces, this
could be an issue.
We faced this problem recently. In fact on a subnet shared by 2 routers, one
host used my 4507 as its default gateway. As the 4507 knew that the best
path to reach the destination was through
Would it be possible to share your configuration (remove passwords, MD5
hashes, ... before).
Your tricky problem wakes up my interest ! :-)
At least, I am happy (for you) that you found out a stable situation until
the high CPU root cause is found.
BTW, how much ram do you have on your router ?
I've got some high CPU measured on another Cisco equipment (Catalyst 4500,
so different architecture and different process involved). But this story
can maybe help.
The story ended when we discovered that on a given SVI, my switch generated
lots of ICMP Redirects on a given VLAN.
Maybe this can
Hi Jurgen,
Thank for your message.
But it was not my decision to put the continue clause in that position. It
is IOS that did so, whatever the order you configure your set and
continue statements.
Yann
2011/2/15 Jurgen Marenda j...@ilk.net
Yann,
you have configured a rout-map with a
Hi !
I would like to apply some sophisticated rules with my prefixes announced
with BGP.
I saw that Cisco implemented a continue clause that could permit me to
achieve my goal.
Before implemented such rules on my productive routers, I did some tests
with GNS3, but it seems that the continue
IOS)
but my config was with 'continue' pointing to a specific rule:
route-map TRANSIT-OUT permit 10
match community MATCH_INTERNAL
* continue 20
set comm-list MATCH_INTERNAL delete
Good luck!
On 15/02/11 6:03 AM, Yann GAUTERON wrote:
Hi !
I would like to apply some sophisticated
Hi Antonio,
2010/8/29 Antonio Soares amsoa...@netcabo.pt
Did you notice this problem ?
I did not observe the problem by myself, but there is a long thread about
it on NANOG mailing list. You can go through their archives to read what
have been said:
3.6 is out since Tuesday this week :-)
2010/3/18 Mikhail Schedrin msched...@gmail.com
Sorry that I didn't answer so much time.
As I got to know from cisco engineers 2 SCMs are supported only by software
3.6 that hasn't released yet.
I did open TAC case, they don't know that 2 SCMs are not
I privately answered to Khalil:
Please refer to
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/cable/serv_exch/serv_control/broadband_app/rel350/swcfg8000/AppendixA_MIBs.html
You'll read that Cisco replaced the Pcube MIBs (Pcube is the company who
created the SCE 1000 and SCE 2000 and which was acquired and
Hi Frank,
Do you monitor the switch resources (CPU, memory) ?
It is very likely that you have a memory leak in a process and no free
memory to allocate for your management process. This is at least the same
behavior that I got once with another Catalyst switch (IOS, don't remember
the version)
What kind of resources are you specifically interested in?
2009/6/15 Felix Nkansah felixnkan...@gmail.com:
Hi Team,
I would appreciate if any on this list could direct me to useful resources
that go in-depth into SS7 and SS7-over-IP protocols, focusing on using Cisco
ITPs in combination with
2009/6/7 Ziv Leyes z...@gilat.net:
I can't imagine any kind of environment that would need 300 or more lines of
ACL, I'm sure most of it is historical trash that can be disposed.
I'd suggest you to try to determine what do you REALLY need and create new
ACL based on actual and updated needs,
What chassis and line cards do you run? Is the Ethernet0/0 a physical
interface or an internal (virtual) interface.
This error can be due to real collisions on physical interfaces due to
duplex mismatch.
But I also met this error condition on internal (virtual) interface on an
uBR10012 chassis
I forget where I left my crystal ball.
Can anybody help me to find it ?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi Adrian,
I think a complete show interface fastethernet X/Y would be useful in
order to consider how many drops are present as compared to the total number
of packets and to get details about these drops !
Then, input drops are quite unusual, as it means that the input buffer was
full at
Hi!
These are good metro switches. No main issues with them.
However, as their name imply, these are metro switches. So metro
functionalities are present (UNI/NNI port types for instance, REP resiliency
protocol), while some LAN functionalities are absent (such as VTP for
instance which is less
Hi Paul,
If I understand well, you're doing VoIP over a PPPoE link.
I never tried such a configuration (does not mean it should not work, just I
never had the chance to have to implement it), but as you're mentionning
that voice quality is not good, I would consider:
1) First thing very
Hello the list,
I am a new talker here, but an attentive reader and I appreciate the level
of your discussions, guys.
As I am having some suspect behaviour with one of my (in fact one of my
customer's) border router, I'd like to read about your experience and maybe
you already have had such a
19 matches
Mail list logo
